Jesus created Sex

Djj, why did you alter the dates concerning your end times prophecy? How does the failure of your earlier prophecy not make you a false prophet? Also, have you, in the interest of truth and honesty, amended your website so that it no longer gives an incorrect distance between Earth and moon? Have you recalculated any of your divine equations now that you have been shown so many computational errors in your proofs?
 
Words.
No reason.
Just words.
No argument.
Only silly words.

Which begs the question.

Who cares?
No one.

This makes for a nice seque into song, from the Broadway Musical

"My Flamed Crazy"

*Voice of Julie Andrews/Eliza Doolittle *

I get words all day through
First from him now from you
Is that all you wankers can do?

Here we are all posting
On the forums of JREF
Home of Darat
And that Wagg, Jeff

Here we are discussing
Sex from Jesus and his team
More DJJ posts
And I"ll screeeam!

Don't talk of sex
Fish or T Rex
Me, you guys vex
Show me!

Don't talk of love
Lust and desire
Nor prophesy dire
Show me!

Don't wait until
Dogs mate with cats
Don't cross a goat with a cow!

Shooww -- Mee -- Now!


Apologies to Rogers, Hammerstein, and Rex Harrison.

*Voice of Alfred Doolittle/ Stanley Holloway*

I'm getting banned from all the forums
Ding dong, obscenity my crime
Fools come and flame me
Thread starters blame me
But watch me just get banned next time . . .


DR
 
Last edited:
Evolutionary theory is totally bogus and literally and scientifically INSANE.


DJJ's postings are totally bogus and literally and certifiably insane.

Have you ever had a temporal lobe seizure?

What is the definition of entropy?

What is a barycenter, and how can its location be calculated?

I have answered all of the questions you have put to me. It is now your turn, you lying false prophet. I predict that DJJ will fail to answer these questions correctly. Time and DJJ will show that I am a true prophet.
 
You definitely aren;t intelligent, I mean that's impossible as by definition false skeptics can not obtain knowledge and wisdom

But Ran, even for you, your lasting posting is almost totally devoid.

We are not talking about kinky deviant sexual life styles we are talking about animals being made different sexually by supposed gene mutation that makes them deviant or just different than their peers and the ideal.... let's say that the female of the species is looking for.

Her mutations in mind and instinct will not match his new make up.

Evolutionary theory is totally bogus and literally and scientifically INSANE.

Since this thread deserves a kitten, and this preposterous assertion deserves a rebuttal, I append 1119305695sidney2.jpga mutant kitten. It's no joke. Your assertion is disconfirmed by the existence and proliferation of polydactyl cats.
 
If you can;t explain sexual evolution HERE, why should I go there.

I know this is petty, but answer my questions first, and then I will answer yours.

Answer the questions posed to you, and these latest ones, and I may consider it.

Again, if you stop ignoring my questions and answer them, I will be inclined to answer yours.

You're a grad student, don't be afraid, you can still change your whole lifes study, if you are honest. Yea RIGHT..

Are you calling me dishonest? Evidence, please.
 
Unless magically the fairy god of evolution shall touch his/her wand down and make a more beautiful individual species that magically is more beautiful than all his fellows and all the ladies of that species shall fall down and worship him and want him for their own to give unto him new creatures with all those new magic atributes that magically came into existence.....

Yeah, I knew that guy in college. He really p***** me off.
 
One deviation from the norm and that deviant individual is shunned as a mating partner by the others. The slightest deviant from the ideal and they become loners.
Bullspit! What is "the norm"? Consider the wide variation in physical features within our own species, height, body form, skin pigmentation, facial features, hair, eye color, limb proportion etc. etc. etc. Is there only one ideal? Which is the norm? Does every human male look exactly like every other human male? By its very nature reproduction leads to a wide variety of forms within a species. It is these variations that the environment selects for or against. For example: If the environment changes and food becomes more scarce then larger individuals may have a harder time surviving and reproducing, leaving fewer offspring in the species' gene pool. Whereas smaller individuals may be able to produce more offspring leading to a greater frequency of their genes in the species as a whole with each generation. Over time the average size of the species may become smaller and smaller. Or let's say that a browsing species feeds on a certain tree. Those trees that tend to grow higher faster, and thus escape being denuded of leaves in the spring, will be able to reproduce more successfully. Of the species that feeds on them those individuals that are taller will be able to reach more food in times when food is scarce, thus reproducing more successfully than shorter individuals. Over time the trees and the animals may both get taller. At no point are the "deviant" freaks you write of involved. I suspect you've watched too much '50s science fiction.

Unless magically the fairy god of evolution shall touch his/her wand down and make a more beautiful individual species that magically is more beautiful than all his fellows and all the ladies of that species shall fall down and worship him and want him for their own to give unto him new creatures with all those new magic atributes that magically came into existence..... and made him stronger, bigger, longer, more desireable than any of his previous not so handsome kind...and so the evolutionists pray to their god for a new species and new mating habits.
You claim to have studied evolution in college but, frankly, I find this hard to believe. You have shown repeatedly that you have not the slightest idea of how evolution works. If you did take classes on evolutionary theory at all you must have had your mind made up before the fact and simply put your fingers in your ears and said "Nanananananananana" to yourself. You seem to be claiming that ugly people never f*** and that only the most beautiful ever reproduce. Again I ask you: Are all people identical to all other people of their own gender? Because you seem to be suggesting that it is "magical" to think that any individual could be taller than another individual. You at least claim to have played professional basketball in Europe (what team was that again?) so I'm guessing you are taller than average yourself. One doesn't have to be "beautiful" to reproduce, one only needs to be successful within ones environment. If that individual has some trait that gives it a slight reproductive advantage over other individuals then that organism's own genes will increase if frequency within the overall population with each successive generation.

Insanity to the max.
Yes, what you wrote is pretty crazy. Of course, it has nothing to do with actual evolutionary biology.
 
The Earth is getting better all the time even if it contradicts entrophy, because we evolutionists and false skeptics want it to be so. In our closed minds and in our closed system we don't degenerate into nothingness, we get better by luck and chance if given billions of years of throwing some dice. Eventually we will win and change for the better, we are the exception to entrophy, we can;t prove it, but we can CLAIM that entrophy has no power over us or our closed minded worlds and minds.

Evolutionists are so devoid and irrational and unmathematical, deny statistics and just base every thing on HOPE and FAITH in the absolutely impossible that their God of Evolution shall deliver them and make them magically with them doing absolutely nothing.

Sexual genes differentiate in the beginning and learning can not be passed on from generation to generation. Each individual has to choose and decide.

These evolutionists and their idiotic lame brain religious doctrine of reincarnation, that learned lessons make us better and better... ridicuolous insane religiousity....

Taffer, how in the world could you keep a straight face when you write. You are forced to write exactly what you have been trained to write.... rote learning..... rote learning forced upon mindless students of a mindless religion...evolution.

Hmmm, now what do those darned psychiatrists call people who entertain unrealistic fantasies about achievements, power, beauty, intelligence or romance?
 
Well, I give up. I got a few responses, then was ignored again. Either respond, point by point, to my post I have linked to many times, David, or I shan't bother discussing things with you.

And it's your loss. If you had joined me in the thread on evolution, you would have learned a great deal.

If you might have started HERE, by explaining how evolution created sex, then I might have figured you had the courage to defend the undefendable insanity of evolution.

But logically and rationally and scientifically it is absolutely impossible to think that different genders evolved simulataneously storing magic mutations that one day sprang to life and erections and enetered a new phase non asexual reproduction.

Was it inch by inch or system by system or one gender evolved then the other caught up, or was it gradual chase scene over billions of years.

Do answer, and state your case for sexual evolution. Don't start a vaque go no where thread, start HERE, because the subject came up HERE FIRST.
 
Hmmm, now what do those darned psychiatrists call people who entertain unrealistic fantasies about achievements, power, beauty, intelligence or romance?

They call them evolutionists or athieists. But HERE, they can be lumped together as False skeptics.

Thanks for understanding this..... Miss Anthrope
 
If you might have started HERE, by explaining how evolution created sex, then I might have figured you had the courage to defend the undefendable insanity of evolution.

But logically and rationally and scientifically it is absolutely impossible to think that different genders evolved simulataneously storing magic mutations that one day sprang to life and erections and enetered a new phase non asexual reproduction.

Was it inch by inch or system by system or one gender evolved then the other caught up, or was it gradual chase scene over billions of years.

Do answer, and state your case for sexual evolution. Don't start a vaque go no where thread, start HERE, because the subject came up HERE FIRST.

I have already said I will just as soon as you address my outstanding post to you.

Will you please respond to my post! It should not take 3 pages to get a response from you, David.
 
They call them evolutionists or athieists. But HERE, they can be lumped together as False skeptics.

Thanks for understanding this..... Miss Anthrope

What a reprehensible little slime you are. Are you utterly lacking gonads that you must play this childish game to make points?

THIS is how you argue? THIS is your dazzling intellect in action?

And tell me, when you finished typing, did you clap your hands with glee and congratulate yourself on being so clever? I must say: we're all just devastated by your wit.

:p
 
DJJ's post was the first on the forums that I saw today. When I saw that his name was backwards, I thought the mods (for shame!) were picking on him...but then I realized it's April Fool's. :)

ETA: Fear the wrath of Omsoc!
 
One deviation from the norm and that deviant individual is shunned as a mating partner by the others. The slightest deviant from the ideal and they become loners.

Unless magically the fairy god of evolution shall touch his/her wand down and make a more beautiful individual species that magically is more beautiful than all his fellows and all the ladies of that species shall fall down and worship him and want him for their own to give unto him new creatures with all those new magic atributes that magically came into existence..... and made him stronger, bigger, longer, more desireable than any of his previous not so handsome kind...and so the evolutionists pray to their god for a new species and new mating habits.

Insanity to the max.

... we are talking about animals being made different sexually by supposed gene mutation that makes them deviant or just different than their peers and the ideal.... let's say that the female of the species is looking for.

These statements are false, and demonstrably so: Aside from the fact that plants, which also reproduce sexually, do not choose their mates, the simple and obvious fact that animals (including humans) possessing conspicuous and visible mutations, defects, deformities and deviations are clearly, visibly successful in mating falsifies your statements. In addition to the obvious and viable couplings of mutant and variant organisms, nature abounds with examples of attempts, successful and unsuccessful, by animals of one species to mate with animals of another species. Wolf dogs, ligers, mules, and hybrid tomatoes declare your proposition null and void. A moose will mount a dairy cow. The fact that the mating is unsuccessful does not diminish the fact that the moose will do it, and the cow will let him, and one example of this in the history of the universe makes your first statement a demonstrable falsehood.

I prefer, however, the cuddly counterexample: All by itself, the polydactyl pussycat shreds your falsehood with all twelve of its cute little toes. It's true!

Your assertion, like so many of your others, goes beyond mere obstinacy and foolishness, into the realm of delusion. I find it hard to believe that anyone who declares as truths ideas that are so utterly disconnected from observable reality could be sane enough to function in the world.
 
Of course your assumption that a reluctance to worship whatever your God might be, or a reluctance to accept your twaddle as representative of anything but your madness, is itself an error; but even if we accepted your God and your error, and even if we decided that Paulhoff's self worship was a sin and a blasphemy, you'd still be wrong, and guilty of your usual habit of redefining words and concepts into a nonsensical mush to suggest that Paulhoff's self worship was worship of nothing at all.


Jer 13:10 This evil people, which refuse to hear my words, which walk in the imagination of their heart, and walk after other gods, to serve them, and to worship them, shall even be as this girdle, which is good for nothing.

clearpixel.gif


Jeremiah does a much better job, than I could ever do answering that query. Thanks for asking it. Bruto. Paul and athiests do worship themselves, even though they are not gods and are nothing, and sadly good for nothing.

But then again, while there is life, there is hope.
 
I have already said I will just as soon as you address my outstanding post to you.

Will you please respond to my post! It should not take 3 pages to get a response from you, David.

Taffer, I have answered you over and over agin, and whn I ask just one answer from you, you demand that I again answer you FIRST.

No you, and Dirkson, another evolutionists that wants a private debate.... answer HERE.

What evidence you have that Sexuality evolved. Separately and yet cohesively together through millions of beneficial mutations that were held recessive til they magically appeared simulatnaeously in bioth genders, and both genders then magically realized they loved the NEW LOOK, and started mating like rabbits before the NEW LOOK genetics died off.
 
How does someone's belief affect whether or not you are wrong? You have been so wrong about so much you have posted here.

Define entropy.

Define barycenter.

Do you know why you have not met this simple challenge yet? Because you cannot.
 
Why are evolutionists so afraid and fearful !!!

They have no evidence, they have no proofs and yet the false skeptics love the excuse the evolutionary priest hood in their white gowns gives them. They swallow their lies without question just like they swallow the lies of their government trench coated ones.
 

Back
Top Bottom