Jesus created Sex

Taffer said:
How do you know?
Click to expand...

Because it's in Bible, no wait, Paul wrote in the Bible...but he didn't write the truth...but I thought god wrote the bible...now I am just confused:boggled:
 
Last edited:
jsfisher said:
Let me see if I understand all this:

Sex only exists if Jesus created it, but, there is no evidence of Jesus actually existing (other than the self-serving and contradictory accounts in the Bible).

So, sex must not exist for if it did, then that would be evidence of Jesus, of which there isn't, yadda, yadda, yadda.
Click to expand...

No Jesus always existed and sex was always part of His Nature. And whether you believe in His existence or not does not change the FACT of His existence nor the existence of sex even if you can;t see that either or aren't getting any either. he and sex still exists.
 
jsfisher said:
Ok, now here's my question: What do I tell the wife later on this evening?
Click to expand...

Be honest and better yet be honest with each other before hand, and know each other before marrying. For honesty and communication and mutual values is the only way to true freedom. You can;t pick and choose honesty, it has to be in all areas .. and that means it has to come from Him that created all areas and ourselves as well.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Yes, you are confused, so just take some time off, get yourself together and then start with the BASICS... Maybe try...

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Biblemysteries.html
Click to expand...

You ducked!

ETA (got caught on the phone)

Why would I listen to a guy who's math is wrong and who can't spell to save his life. When you have something worthy of saying and has been proven true, I may consider having a look at what you have writen. So far, all I have seen is delusions, lies and insults
 
Last edited:
It's no use, Zep. The heckling of the trolls is a favorite pass time of many here. Now that David has completely showed his hand, he is entitiled to whatever action he gets for the duration of his stay.
 
Hyparxis said:
It's no use, Zep. The heckling of the trolls is a favorite pass time of many here. Now that David has completely showed his hand, he is entitiled to whatever action he gets for the duration of his stay.
Click to expand...

Keeps me awake on the night shift:)
 
Lisa Simpson said:
I didn't read much of it. But tell me, does he mention how all those other people came into existence before sex was created? As I recall, there was lots and lots of begatting in the OT.
Click to expand...


Maybe he means J invented whacking off or guy-guy sex. I think that's contrary to the bibble - but then DJs rants usually are - not that it matters.

On the other hand, it clearly is a troll, DFTT - or start kittens and recipes.
 
Allow me to suggest to you the answer why, the false skeptics HERE can not win an argument and can't post a positive THREAD anywhere.

The reason is simple, because their whole modus operandi is believing in nothing. Therefore they can have no background basis for anything, and hence every post is basically there first beginning steps into that realm. They have no intellectual weapons to stand on, as negation is not a weapon. It has no positive values.

They can not refer to a website or much less their own website, because by their very lack of any orientation and being unable to connect up anything, they are forced to be null and void and weaponless mentally. They can NOT have websites or share any truths because they deny all truths and are afraid of truths that connect and show reason and logic and design.

Chaos and luck and chance just don't allow them to build websites that show luck and chance built them. Hence they are are weaponless and unarmed when it comes to any real discussion and so must revert back to their congregational name calling of any that dare differ with their nothingness.

That's my accessment of why false skeptics keep name calling, and labeling and making foolish comments in real discussions. They are uarmed and so try mockery and foolishness, and hence lose all crebability, which is shown because they have no visable websites to call their own.
 
YOU ARE UNABLE TO DENY MY AWESOMENESS. SUCH A SIMPLE ACT YET YOU FEAR IT.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
....They can not refer to a website or much less their own website, because by their very lack of any orientation and being unable to connect up anything, they are forced to be null and void and weaponless mentally. They can NOT have websites or share any truths because they deny all truths and are afraid of truths that connect and show reason and logic and design....
Click to expand...

Citing yourself is always a sign of a feeble argument.

Plenty of poeple on this board have sites, though i'm not one of them.

They are uarmed and so try mockery and foolishness, and hence lose all crebability, which is shown because they have no visable websites to call their own.
Click to expand...

Anybody with the money (doen't even need a lot) and internet connection can have a website. But it doesn't make you any more credible than the shabby guy on the street corner with the sandwich board reading "Prepare to Meet thy DOOM" and handing out badly photocopied leaflets.
 
Last edited:
Davidjayjordan said:
That's my accessment of why false skeptics keep name calling, and labeling and making foolish comments in real discussions. They are uarmed and so try mockery and foolishness, and hence lose all crebability, which is shown because they have no visable websites to call their own.
Click to expand...

You have insulted people, told lies and want to argue against the laws of Physics. You are a deluded fool.
 
OK, this has been fun and all, but I think I am going to sum up my thoughts on this thread and, more importantly, on this poster in one question.

DJJ, have you ever had temporal lobe seizures?

I hate to use the term "textbook case", but this seems to be one. I will quote a passage from the chapter "God and the Limbic System" from the book listed in my sig. Any spelling errors are my own.

Patients have heightened emotions and see cosmic significance in trivial events. It is claimed that they tend to be humorless, full of self-importance, and to maintain elaborate diaries [Hokulele - or websites!] that record quotidian events in elaborate detail - a trait called hypergraphia. Patients have on occasion given me hundreds of pages of written text filled with mystical symbols and notations. Some of these patients are sticky in conversation, argumentative, pedantic, and egocentric (although less so than many of my scientific colleagues), and they are obsessively preoccupied with philosophical and theological issues.
Click to expand...

Ramachandran then goes on to describe a case study. One line of this description states:

But later that afternoon, Paul flirted shamelessly with two of my female graduate students and tried to get their home telephone numbers. This paradoxical combination of loss of libido and a preoccupation with sexual rituals is not unusual in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.
Click to expand...

It is just coincidence that I had read this book right before DJJ started posting, but I think this explains much of the behaviour we have seen on this and other threads.
 
Last edited:
Davidjayjordan said:
No Jesus always existed and sex was always part of His Nature. And whether you believe in His existence or not does not change the FACT of His existence nor the existence of sex even if you can;t see that either or aren't getting any either. he and sex still exists.
Click to expand...

It is not a fact if you only assert it to be so, David. Do you have any evidence?
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Allow me to suggest to you the answer why, the false skeptics HERE can not win an argument and can't post a positive THREAD anywhere.
Click to expand...

Since you've been unable to convince anyone here of your drivel, I'd say it's you who are unable to win an argument, huh?

The reason is simple, because their whole modus operandi is believing in nothing. Therefore they can have no background basis for anything, and hence every post is basically there first beginning steps into that realm. They have no intellectual weapons to stand on, as negation is not a weapon. It has no positive values.
Click to expand...

That is not what it means to be a skeptic.

They can not refer to a website or much less their own website, because by their very lack of any orientation and being unable to connect up anything, they are forced to be null and void and weaponless mentally. They can NOT have websites or share any truths because they deny all truths and are afraid of truths that connect and show reason and logic and design.
Click to expand...

Having your own website does not make you right!

Chaos and luck and chance just don't allow them to build websites that show luck and chance built them. Hence they are are weaponless and unarmed when it comes to any real discussion and so must revert back to their congregational name calling of any that dare differ with their nothingness.
Click to expand...

What about those of us who do have websites?

That's my accessment of why false skeptics keep name calling, and labeling and making foolish comments in real discussions. They are uarmed and so try mockery and foolishness, and hence lose all crebability, which is shown because they have no visable websites to call their own.
Click to expand...

We do so because you have shown no desire to answer any of our questions. Perhaps you'd like to change this? Why not answer my questions about biology?
 
Davidjayjordan said:
They can not refer to a website or much less their own website, because by their very lack of any orientation and being unable to connect up anything, they are forced to be null and void and weaponless mentally. They can NOT have websites or share any truths because they deny all truths and are afraid of truths that connect and show reason and logic and design.
Click to expand...

You make no sense.

I have many many web sites.

Here's one: http://www.notjustatheory.com/
 
You've ignored my questions, so I'll ask them again:

Is there a Mrs. God? I've never heard about her if there is. How did Mr. God create sex if he didn't have a partner? Is Man (by Man I mean the human race) really created in His image if Man produces gametes for reproduction?

Did Jesus ever have sex? If so, how many partners, and who were they? If not, why not?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom