Jesus created Sex

Gentlefolk all,

DJJ IS A TROLL. HE IS SIMPLY TRYING TO PUMP HIS WEBSITE HIT-COUNT AND GOOGLE-BOMB IT WITH HIS SIG. YOU ARE ADVISED NOT TO PLAY WITH HIM ANY MORE.

Regards

bumped so it'll be prominent on top of the next page

(Agreed. I figured someone had to have reported him for spamming, but I haven't seen any little yellow taggies on the posts I've thought should've been warned.)
 
The chance of me visiting his website is nil.

He still has some limited entertainment value though.
 
Oh, the Greek gods were pretty powerful, although I have always had a soft spot in my heart for Thor. I like thunder. But for sex creating I definitely give it to Zeus hands down. Even when he didn't quite know what he was doing (I mean how do you miss Aphrodite and impregnate Gaia instead?) he certainly seemed to be doing a lot of it. We don't get any of that about Jesus in the Bible. You would think if he created it, he would be doing it.

Of course he did it, he created it, and him doing it would be natural and normal and very spiritual as He had the best heart possible and would be giving not taking and loving not possessing.

Read between the lines as the church system has removed much of the sexual truths about Jesus and the Bible.

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/DoesthelordhaveaPenus.html

As for thunder, it goes together with lightning, and gives the earth its resonance.... and it is sexual...

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/LightningElectricityandSex.html
 
Wait a minute, you just told me in another thread that you decided everything in the bible written by Paul is wrong.

No i said sometimes Paul was not in the Spirit, just like you. And when Paul spoke about women, and telling them to shut up, cover their hair and obey their husbands to the max, then he was speaking as a man not in the Spirit of the Lord, for the Lord gives freedom and wisdom and equality. This many men are afraid of, as they want power over women.

Paul was so afraid of women, that he wouldn;t allow widows into the congregation until they turned sixty and supposedly asexual... Paul was petrified when it came to women.

Use discernment Hok, rather than labeling. Duiscernment takes time and principles established to figure out. You can NOT be spoon fed.... it takes study and real life and real heart.

Which dress code do you prefer Paul's or the Lord's

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/PaulsDressCode.html
 
I said .....If there is anything I know its BIOLOGY... .
I accept this statement as true, though perhaps not the way he intended it.

For tricky, knowing biology doesn't just come from book reading or from the universities of man, but knowing it in real life in the mountains, on the beaches, under water, in real life with real people and with real women.

As mentioned it is not a word game but real experiences, for real skepticism loses its skepticism when faced with real love from a real woman.

Its straight forward if you are...
 
How do you know? Are you Joey Greco from Cheaters? And if your education in biology is anything like your other "world class" acheivements, spare us the extra laugh.

How many are agreeing with you that you have frustrated those here other than the ones in your own head?

Bjorn, count the foolish posts by your frustrated comrades that are trying to wreck a discussion here and elsewhere. they fear DESIGN and they fear honest discussions even more.

They are frustrated and it shows in their foolish postings.
 
Now back to JESUS CREATED SEX.... for true skeptics would have to try and find an alternative to him creating it.

So give your best shot and state how sex created itself or by lucky chance was created, or tell me which of your gods created it and how.

Thanks, hoping to hear from ya !!!
 
No i said sometimes Paul was not in the Spirit, just like you. And when Paul spoke about women, and telling them to shut up, cover their hair and obey their husbands to the max, then he was speaking as a man not in the Spirit of the Lord, for the Lord gives freedom and wisdom and equality. This many men are afraid of, as they want power over women.

Paul was so afraid of women, that he wouldn;t allow widows into the congregation until they turned sixty and supposedly asexual... Paul was petrified when it came to women.

Use discernment Hok, rather than labeling. Duiscernment takes time and principles established to figure out. You can NOT be spoon fed.... it takes study and real life and real heart.

Which dress code do you prefer Paul's or the Lord's

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/PaulsDressCode.html

So you are admiting that there are parts of the Bible are not true. Finally, something you have writen which is true.
 
I said .....If there is anything I know its BIOLOGY... .

But, you don't.

For tricky, knowing biology doesn't just come from book reading or from the universities of man, but knowing it in real life in the mountains, on the beaches, under water, in real life with real people and with real women

I agree, but you can't beat the laws of physics, no matter what a bunch of ancient people wrote, thousands of years ago.

As mentioned it is not a word game but real experiences, for real skepticism loses its skepticism when faced with real love from a real woman.

You can have sex with as many people as you want, David, it is not going to change the way the real world works.
 
Last edited:
So you are admiting that there are parts of the Bible are not true. Finally, something you have writen which is true.
The direct words of the Lord are true, prophecy, what Jesus said, and many other places. Other parts are just scripturial, other parts like in parts of Paul's writings are just his opinion and can differ greatly from the Lord's

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/PaulsDressCode.html

And a few parts have been deleted ...as they are just tooooo heavy for beginners.

But there are enough truths there for anyone to connect up with the truth giver. Hence even devious translations can be a LINK to the Lord. besides the bible is just supposed to be the START of a relationship of wisdom and learning and not the end all be ALL as the churchies teach.

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/WhatisScripture.html

How's sweet Adelaide, or beautiful Brisbane, or more importantly Surfers Paradise... ahhh the beach, the sun and the fun....
 
No i said sometimes Paul was not in the Spirit, just like you. And when Paul spoke about women, and telling them to shut up, cover their hair and obey their husbands to the max, then he was speaking as a man not in the Spirit of the Lord, for the Lord gives freedom and wisdom and equality.

How do you know?

Paul was so afraid of women, that he wouldn;t allow widows into the congregation until they turned sixty and supposedly asexual... Paul was petrified when it came to women.

How do you know?

Use discernment Hok, rather than labeling. Duiscernment takes time and principles established to figure out. You can NOT be spoon fed.... it takes study and real life and real heart.

Many of us have done years of study into many subjects, David. You, it appears, have not.

Which dress code do you prefer Paul's or the Lord's

Man, what an uptight git! God even requires a dress code to get into heaven! :rolleyes:
 
The direct words of the Lord are true, prophecy, what Jesus said, and many other places. Other parts are just scripturial, other parts like in parts of Paul's writings are just his opinion and can differ greatly from the Lord's

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/PaulsDressCode.html

And a few parts have been deleted ...as they are just tooooo heavy for beginners.

But there are enough truths there for anyone to connect up with the truth giver. Hence even devious translations can be a LINK to the Lord. besides the bible is just supposed to be the START of a relationship of wisdom and learning and not the end all be ALL as the churchies teach.

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/WhatisScripture.html

How's sweet Adelaide, or beautiful Brisbane, or more importantly Surfers Paradise... ahhh the beach, the sun and the fun....

Sounds to me you are picking and choosing what you want to believe in, but that is consistant with all of your other threads as well. You have posted serveral quotes from the Bible that goes against doing this.

Brisbane is dark at the moment - love working the night shift, 6pm till 6 am. Nothing happens on a Sunday, when you work for the government. Have you ever been to Australia?
 
I said .....If there is anything I know its BIOLOGY... .

And you ignored my questions. Please answer them, or admit you know nothing about biology (or google).

For tricky, knowing biology doesn't just come from book reading or from the universities of man, but knowing it in real life in the mountains, on the beaches, under water, in real life with real people and with real women.

Fair enough. But, y'know, I'd trust anything Tricky has to say about biology over you any day of the week.

As mentioned it is not a word game but real experiences, for real skepticism loses its skepticism when faced with real love from a real woman.

So you don't have any scientific evidence for anything then?

Its straight forward if you are...

Evidence is very straight foward. You are anything but.
 
Now back to JESUS CREATED SEX.... for true skeptics would have to try and find an alternative to him creating it.

So give your best shot and state how sex created itself or by lucky chance was created, or tell me which of your gods created it and how.

Thanks, hoping to hear from ya !!!

Nothing "created sex". That is a meaningless phrase. If you really wish to learn how the two sexes came about, we can teach. But you don't really wish to learn, do you?
 
The direct words of the Lord are true, prophecy, what Jesus said, and many other places. Other parts are just scripturial, other parts like in parts of Paul's writings are just his opinion and can differ greatly from the Lord's

How do you know?

And a few parts have been deleted ...as they are just tooooo heavy for beginners.

How do you know?

But there are enough truths there for anyone to connect up with the truth giver. Hence even devious translations can be a LINK to the Lord. besides the bible is just supposed to be the START of a relationship of wisdom and learning and not the end all be ALL as the churchies teach.

What about other religions?
 
Let me see if I understand all this:

Sex only exists if Jesus created it, but, there is no evidence of Jesus actually existing (other than the self-serving and contradictory accounts in the Bible).

So, sex must not exist for if it did, then that would be evidence of Jesus, of which there isn't, yadda, yadda, yadda.

Ok, now here's my question: What do I tell the wife later on this evening?
 

Back
Top Bottom