Jesus created Sex

Davidjayjordan said:
Now back to some good old fashioned from the BEGINNING SEX, as the Lord created completely formed and beautiful human beings right from the start. And from the Beginning, they did what came naturally, even if the Lord gave them the O.K. to 'be fruitful and mulitply'.

Mind you they had 130 years of recreational sex before they reproduced.

This showing also that sex is for more than just reproduction, but for unity and pleasure and LOVE.

Ahh tis love and love alone the whole world yearns for
Click to expand...

Freud would have an absolute field day with you. The sheer amount of repressed sexual desires fuming in your brain is surely enough to power the infrastructure for a small nation.

I'd be more than curious to hear the off-the-cuff opinions on DJJ from any psychologists or psychiatrists on the forums.
 
jsiv said:
Embrace the Lord and get 130 years of recreational sex!
Click to expand...
Especially in the context of Mr. Jordan's declared taste for polyamory, I cannot help but be reminded of the famous exchange between Gladstone and Disraeli:

Once at a social gathering, Gladstone said to Disraeli: 'I predict, Sir, that you will die either by hanging or of some vile disease'.

Disraeli replied, 'That all depends, sir, upon whether I embrace your principles or your mistress.'
Click to expand...

Embrace the lord, but the prophets are a gamble.
 
David, you still have provided NO PROOF that jesus created sex, so there is no reason for us to discuss it. And remember the bible is NOT sufficient proof. It is a very old book written by men. There is no proof that it is of any divine origin. It can not be taken as proof for any of your delusions.
 
bruto said:
Especially in the context of Mr. Jordan's declared taste for polyamory, I cannot help but be reminded of the famous exchange between Gladstone and Disraeli:



Embrace the lord, but the prophets are a gamble.
Click to expand...

Hey, not all polyamorous types are nuts like DJJ. No one wants him playing on their team.
 
Cosmo said:
Freud would have an absolute field day with you. The sheer amount of repressed sexual desires fuming in your brain is surely enough to power the infrastructure for a small nation.

I'd be more than curious to hear the off-the-cuff opinions on DJJ from any psychologists or psychiatrists on the forums.
Click to expand...


I am neither of the above, but you can see my opinion of why DJJ posts like this here.
 
Kochanski said:
David, you still have provided NO PROOF that jesus created sex, so there is no reason for us to discuss it. And remember the bible is NOT sufficient proof. It is a very old book written by men. There is no proof that it is of any divine origin. It can not be taken as proof for any of your delusions.
Click to expand...

Kochanski, you still have provided NO PROOF that evolution created sex, so there is no reason for us to discuss it. And remember your newly made up evolutionary science books are NOT sufficient proof. They are perverted from the authors forced to write books written by men. There is no proof that it is of any evolutionary origin. It can not be taken as proof for any of your delusions.

As for me I am sexual, I assume your parents must have been to produce you, and hopefully you are to some degree, so unless it all came about by luck and chance then it must have come about by DESIGN....and hence a designer.

Especially when you notice the exact proportions of where our sexual organs are... 1/2 and 3/4 Not by chance but by design.

And then when you discover the phi relationship of our naval or birth point, and or center of gravity it should you we have a mathematical God, concerned with beauty.

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/GoldenSectionandyourBody.html

Isn't His mathematics sexual and inspiring.

But don't worry if your ratios aren't perfect, you can at least dream the dream.
 
Last edited:
Gord_in_Toronto said:
He's also ignored a fair number of my posts!! :boxedin:

? :covereyes
Click to expand...

As mentionjed Gord, I try to only respond to posts that have meaning and depth where answers might have importance in helping us learn or others learn.

At this point in time, it appears you think you know it all and yet say nothing. But if you get sincere, then I may respond to you.

Thanks for turning out for the team, maybe next season.

Now back to the mathematics of sex and PHI, and the 1/2 ratio.
 
I don't want to bug you, David, but I'd really appreciate a reply to my post above.
 
If that was a post about your evolutionary thread, Taffer, I may join the discussion, I may not because I am not an expert on evolution, only hopefully an expert on design.

Why would I want to get into studying something that makes absolutely no sense, from the beginning, from its essense to anything it states.

Viruses are interesting though, I must admit that as they do have a specific purpose in the Lord's creative plan.....
 
Davidjayjordan said:
If that was a post about your evolutionary thread, Taffer, I may join the discussion, I may not because I am not an expert on evolution, only hopefully an expert on design.

Why would I want to get into studying something that makes absolutely no sense, from the beginning, from its essense to anything it states.

Viruses are interesting though, I must admit that as they do have a specific purpose in the Lord's creative plan.....
Click to expand...

Davidjayjordan said:
No, but if you have warmth in heart, spirit, wisdom, humor, humility and love, they will come....and all these things the Lord can give you.
Click to expand...

You really are a parody of yourself... :roll:
 
Davidjayjordan said:
If that was a post about your evolutionary thread, Taffer, I may join the discussion, I may not because I am not an expert on evolution, only hopefully an expert on design.
Click to expand...


If you are not an expert, why do you keep talking like you know anything about it. Why don't you actually learn something about the topic before you bring it up.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
If that was a post about your evolutionary thread, Taffer, I may join the discussion, I may not because I am not an expert on evolution, only hopefully an expert on design.

Why would I want to get into studying something that makes absolutely no sense, from the beginning, from its essense to anything it states.

Viruses are interesting though, I must admit that as they do have a specific purpose in the Lord's creative plan.....
Click to expand...

Firstly, no, I am talking about this post.

The link again is: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2458758#post2458758

Secondly, that is what the evolution thread is for. For you to submit your problems with evolution, and for them to be discussed in a scientific manor, without any religous arguments. It will only help your cause, David, if you are able to provide good, scientific, arguments. Please join us.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Randfan, as mentioned the Lord says, Avoid the devoid' until you mellow out and get under control.

Til then, you probably won;t get a response from me....... unless you stumble accidentally onto a good query or a good statement of truth .... improbable but possible.
Click to expand...
You are dishonest sir. Can you show me something that I said that was not true?

I didn't think so. I've shown you many times where you are wrong or outright dishonest.

If you could show where I was wrong you would.
You can't so you won't.
It's that simple.
You lie.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Kochanski, you still have provided NO PROOF that evolution created sex, so there is no reason for us to discuss it.
Click to expand...
Just look at the design of the sex organs, what so-called god would put the pumping right in the middle of the playground and the crapper is right next door, is that the best your so-called god can do.

Paul

:) :) :)

The human body is just full of poor designs.................
 
Davidjayjordan said:
And then when you discover the phi relationship of our naval or birth point, and or center of gravity it should you we have a mathematical God, concerned with beauty.
Click to expand...

The above statement says it all. Obviously someone is typing with one hand.

Alternate them sometimes, OK?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom