• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Jeffrey MacDonald did it. He really did. Part II

Warp12 said:
Is he dying, or does he just want released because he is old? :confused:
Click to expand...

It was false evidence and Dixieland justice. There is a bit about this matter at this website:

"In the US, there have been numerous examples of lab analysts coming under pressure to produce particular results (see “Could the UK learn lessons from across the pond?“). As our survey reveals, UK analysts face similar pressures: 28.6 per cent of respondents told us they sometimes or always feel pressured to produce a particular result, while 75.4 per cent say they have insufficient time to evaluate a case properly (see diagram). The overwhelming majority – 83.6 per cent – of these felt the issue would get worse over the next five years.

“28.6 per cent of forensic scientists feel pressure to produce a particular result”

“Many of us do not have enough time to do our work, but if you combine this with the fact that nearly a third of [forensic scientists] are coming under pressure to produce a particular result, it gets extremely dangerous,” says Itiel Dror, an expert in cognitive bias at University College London. New Scientist recently showed how DNA analysts can reach very different conclusions about the same evidence (11 August 2010, p 8), raising the danger of contextual information about a case colouring judgement."



Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/articl...arriages-of-justice-will-occur/#ixzz77JGURSyv
 
Henri McPhee said:
It was false evidence and Dixieland justice. There is a bit about this matter at this website:

"In the US, there have been numerous examples of lab analysts coming under pressure to produce particular results (see “Could the UK learn lessons from across the pond?“). As our survey reveals, UK analysts face similar pressures: 28.6 per cent of respondents told us they sometimes or always feel pressured to produce a particular result, while 75.4 per cent say they have insufficient time to evaluate a case properly (see diagram). The overwhelming majority – 83.6 per cent – of these felt the issue would get worse over the next five years.

“28.6 per cent of forensic scientists feel pressure to produce a particular result”

“Many of us do not have enough time to do our work, but if you combine this with the fact that nearly a third of [forensic scientists] are coming under pressure to produce a particular result, it gets extremely dangerous,” says Itiel Dror, an expert in cognitive bias at University College London. New Scientist recently showed how DNA analysts can reach very different conclusions about the same evidence (11 August 2010, p 8), raising the danger of contextual information about a case colouring judgement."



Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/articl...arriages-of-justice-will-occur/#ixzz77JGURSyv
Click to expand...

Yeah, but I am asking about his latest appeal that was rejected. It was filed based on a "compassionate release" request. What were the grounds for that, under law, that he felt applied to him?
 
Warp12 said:
Yeah, but I am asking about his latest appeal that was rejected. It was filed based on a "compassionate release" request. What were the grounds for that, under law, that he felt applied to him?
Click to expand...

Somebody said a couple of years ago that he had suffered some kind of stroke. I have never seen it confirmed that he refused a Covid vaccination. He has been defeated over the years several times appealing to Judges Dupree and Fox and the North Carolina 4th Circuit and rubber stamped by the Supreme Court which was on the grounds of actual innocence. It could be a legal technicality appealing for compassion for an innocent man. The MacDonald case needed some extremely competent and impartial judges.

It's a bit like billionaires only seem interested in space travel and there is to be another series of conferences about climate change, while forests burn.
 
It was an inferior type of justice, more like in a kind of military dictatorship. Murtagh and Blackburn and other MacDonald prosecutors have been proved to be crooked prosecutors, probably because they come from North Carolina, and Bob Stevenson, Colette'sa brother, has said publicly that he knows nothing about the Macdonald case forensics and he has never investigated the matter. The man's a fool:

https://compassionaterelease.com/denials-compassionate-release/
 
Warp12 said:
Do you correspond with MacDonald?
Click to expand...

I have never met the man or corresponded with him. I first became interested in the MacDonald case during the parole hearing in about 2004/5 when there was the same nonsense spouted by the likes of Bob Stevenson and Murtagh and JTF. I was then more interested in the Jon Benet Ramsey case though there were plenty of people who said MacDonald did not get a fair trial. You go by the evidence not by opinion.

https://jeffreymacdonaldcase.weebly.com/
 
From that website:

MY OPINION

"Being a very close friend of Colette MacDonald since high school you would think that I would jump on the bandwagon that her husband did it and he deserves justice, right? Wrong. I have known the MacDonald's for so long, and was even a bridesmaid in their wedding, to know that Jeffrey would never do this to his family. He loved his wife and daughters very much, and was excited to be welcoming his first son into the world very soon. Yes him and his wife fought, but what married couple doesn't? They were very good working through their arguments and were happier than ever before the accident. I may have a biased opinion because I knew the family, but looking at the evidence I still do not believe that Jeffrey MacDonald killed his family. There is not enough evidence, and so much of it was corrupted, that you could not properly prosecute someone with that kind of evidence. It is only right that he shouldn't be serving time for a crime that he did not commit, but that is only my opinion. What is yours?"
 
Hearsay, opinion do not count

McMurderer was a con artist & compulsive liar.

He has fooled many over the past 51 years. Conspiracy theorists are particularly drawn to these fantasies.

Unfortunately for him, he couldn’t avoid the actual evidence.

He’s in a cage where he belongs.
 
Henri McPhee said:
Several of MacDonald case prosecutors have been disbarred in the past for misconduct. That should have been taken into consideration by the bad judges.
Click to expand...

That would have been hard to do in 1979 since Blackburn wouldn't be disbarred for nearly another 15 years. When he was a defense attorney.

Henri McPhee said:
https://jeffreymacdonaldblog.wordpress.com/blog/
Click to expand...

I was amused to see that this blog's authors are 5 students of "Advance English Writing" at Medaille College. 4 of the 5 seem to be interested in careers in veterinary medicine or animal sciences. :D
 
GiSEQ said:
McMurderer was a con artist & compulsive liar.

He has fooled many over the past 51 years. Conspiracy theorists are particularly drawn to these fantasies.

Unfortunately for him, he couldn’t avoid the actual evidence.

He’s in a cage where he belongs.
Click to expand...

These idiots make me sick. It's like some kind of Irish bad character who slanders people behind their backs. Mistakes happen and serious ones. There should have been a careful investigation. North Carolina judges need to pull their socks up and then judge according to the evidence and not by appearance..

I suppose you can say that pizzagate was a conspiracy theory with fabricated evidence like in the Macdonald case and the JonBenet Ramsey case probably involved bad police work. I still think that Covid 19 and climate change and secret bugging is not a conspiracy theory and that Marilyn Monroe was murdered.

The actual so-called evidence against MacDonald was dubious from the start. CID agent Shaw thought Colette murdered one of the little girls and Stombaugh thought Colette hit MacDonald with a hairbrush. CID agent Kearns thought you could retest a urine stain accurately after ninety weeks. Murtagh said at the MacDonald trial that Stombaugh only said it could be and the same with the hairs and threads. Stombaugh was never qualified to present blood evidence in the MacDonald case. An airline pilot needs to be trained and qualified and so does a forensic expert. That was a con job because he had the gift of the gab.

Prosecutor Blackburn was imprisoned for dishonesty in another case. The Justice Department have accused forensic scientist Malone of being a total liar in several murder cases. Murtagh has been accused of coaching witnesses and perverting the course of justice in the Lockerbie case. The foreman of the MacDonald trial jury was overheard by three or four witnesses saying he was going to convict MacDonald before the trial even started!

It was not a fair trial and the real culprits have committed the perfect murder thanks to the stupidity of the American public and journalists, to add to the long list of undetected murders and miscarriages of justice around the world.
 
Last edited:
Poor Jeffrey McMurderer

I find it incredible that supporters of this animal can’t see through his “con”.

Why would the entire US Justice system want to conspire against this nobody for the last 51 years?

He’s just your garden variety serial cheater & family annihilator - happens all over the world far too frequently.

Should remain in his cage & never see the light of day again.
 
GiSEQ said:
I find it incredible that supporters of this animal can’t see through his “con”.

Why would the entire US Justice system want to conspire against this nobody for the last 51 years?

He’s just your garden variety serial cheater & family annihilator - happens all over the world far too frequently.

Should remain in his cage & never see the light of day again.
Click to expand...

"Serial cheating" has nothing to do with murder, in itself. It is very common.
 
GiSEQ said:
I find it incredible that supporters of this animal can’t see through his “con”.

Why would the entire US Justice system want to conspire against this nobody for the last 51 years?

He’s just your garden variety serial cheater & family annihilator - happens all over the world far too frequently.

Should remain in his cage & never see the light of day again.
Click to expand...

It was all mixed up with drug smuggling in North Carolina. Colonel Kriwanek the local CID chief had a daughter who was in the Helena Stoeckley gang. CID officer Ivory was also said to be mixed up in the drug smuggling and one of the initial MacDonald prosecutors,Procter, was also involved. He was Judge Dupree's son in law at the time. Stombaugh, Murtagh and Blackburn all came from North Carolina and the North Carolina judges all backed each other up through thick and thin. It's what is known technically as bribery and corruption and letting the real culprits go free.. Protesting your innocence is not a con job if you are innocent. Personally. I'm disappointed in the Supreme Court.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom