• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jason Bermas Back-Pedelling.

Lyte Trip said:
Zero.

Due to their perfect vantage point, the credibility level of the witnesses themselves, and the multiple levels of corroboration that we have obtained.

Nobody will question it for even a second.

Not a single jrefer will be able to doubt it.

That's why as a courtesy we suggested you start working on an explanation as to how the damage could have been caused from a plane on the north side of the station.
Click to expand...


Put your money where your mouth is or shut up.

Got evidence? Take it to court. If you don't trust the american courts, try the Haag.

But I forget: The NWO runs everything. So why are you still breathing?
 
Lyte Trip said:
Zero.

Due to their perfect vantage point, the credibility level of the witnesses themselves, and the multiple levels of corroboration that we have obtained.

Nobody will question it for even a second.

Not a single jrefer will be able to doubt it.

That's why as a courtesy we suggested you start working on an explanation as to how the damage could have been caused from a plane on the north side of the station.
Click to expand...



Bring the evidence. Bring it. Don't talk about it, don't pump it up. Just bring it.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Since there is no physical damage that would indicate so....this would not be a logical conclusion.
Click to expand...

So the physical evidence left at 700 feet per second at the pentagon on 9/11 when the DNA from the souls on board flight 77 were found in the Pentagon was all planted?

You are not even close on this one.

There is no physical evidence to support you. If you have lost you mind please seek help. (do not confuse physical with words out of mouths)
 
I have my suspicions as to who Lyte is. He sounds very cocky and misinformed. Who else could that be besides Dylan Avery or Jason Bermas himself.
 
2324 Columbia Pike
Arlington, VA 22204
(703) 920-1109

I thougth this was the Citgo Station they were talking about. What if their witnesses are from this station???

Help
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

I said we would "address" the light poles and we will.

That means we will present a hypothesis as to how they were staged.
Click to expand...

Yep, the keebler elves used hacksaws to bring them down.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

I said we would "address" the light poles and we will.

That means we will present a hypothesis as to how they were staged.
Click to expand...

Why present a hypothesis when we already have a conclusion on why the poles came down?
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

I said we would "address" the light poles and we will.

That means we will present a hypothesis as to how they were staged.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, what about the Flight 77 DNA that was identified at the Pentagon? Everyone I think, except for a toddler.
 
Lyte Trip said:
1. I never claimed the fire department said anything.
Click to expand...

No... but Silverstein was talking to the Fire Dept Commander. He reports the words "pull it" being used, and is clearly referring to the firefighting operation, not the demolition of the building.

2. The building is brand new. He will not lose anything.
Click to expand...

Again, Gravy says it best:
What about an insurance motive? Professional conspiracist and radio host Alex "New World Order” Jones claims that Silverstein walked away with a profit of $500 million after building 7’s insurer, Industrial Risk Insurers, paid its $861 million policy!

This shouldn’t need to be said, but the fact that IRI didn’t dispute the $861 million claim should make it perfectly clear that Silverstein didn’t “admit” to destroying his building.

And lest you think that IRI’s management somehow benefited by turning a blind eye to Silverstein’s “crime,” consider that IRI did contest Silverstein’s lawsuit over his Twin Towers insurance claim.

No. Insurance companies have a funny way of making sure that insured parties don’t destroy their skyscrapers, collect the claims, and drive into the sunset with a truckload of cash. A clause in Silverstein’s WTC 7 policy required him to begin rebuilding within two years, and lenders required that the new building have as much square footage as the old (and they complained mightily when the plans came up short in that department). The cost of the new building? Over $700 million.

Hey, that still leaves Silverstein with a tidy profit of around $161 million, right?
No. There was the small matter of the existing $489.4 million mortgage, which Silverstein paid off with the insurance settlement, leaving him with a shortfall of $328 million heading towards construction of the new building.

The City of New York, desperate to see rebuilding begin downtown, saved Silverstein a bundle in financing costs by offering over $400 million in tax-exempt Liberty Bonds, which the Bank of New York guaranteed.

That move gave Silverstein and his backers the freedom to do something unheard of in recent New York real estate history: start construction of a skyscraper without a major (or minor) tenant on board. And when the building opened in 2006? Still no major tenants. In May, WTC 7 finally got its first possible major tenant when Moody’s Investor’s Service signed a nonbinding letter of intent to occupy 15 floors. More recently, other sizable tenants have signed on.

Sources: “Even as Construction Begins, a New Trade Center Tower Faces Obstacles” New York Times, January 16, 2003. “7 World Trade Center Gets a Major Tenant” Official World Trade Center Site The Building Everyone Will Date But No One Will Marry
Click to expand...

3. I don't agree. It was a national disaster of unmatched proportions. To suggest they took no direction from the feds is a stretch.
Click to expand...

No. To suggest that the FBI had direct control over the fate of individual buildings is a stretch. This has all been dealt with, repeatedly, because you people keep popping up like fairground moles. I can only assume you're hoping other posters will tire of refuting your nonsense and leave you free to spam this board with drivel.

Not going to happen.
 
Bell said:
Yep, the keebler elves used hacksaws to bring them down.
Click to expand...

I'm sure their "hypothesis" will go something like this:

"The lightpoles are hollow... therefore they were rigged with alka seltzer and soda!"

:boggled:
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

I said we would "address" the light poles and we will.

That means we will present a hypothesis as to how they were staged.
Click to expand...

Fair enough.

I assure you it will take me much less time to debunk your "light pole staging hypothesis" than it will take for you guys to dream it up.
 
TheGrunion said:
Fair enough.

I assure you it will take me much less time to debunk your "light pole staging hypothesis" than it will take for you guys to dream it up.
Click to expand...

Cool.

Then maybe you can come up with your own.

You're going to have to because there is NO WAY you or anybody can debunk our north of the citgo evidence.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Cool.

Then maybe you can come up with your own.

You're going to have to because there is NO WAY you or anybody can debunk our north of the citgo evidence.
Click to expand...

Don't count your chickens before they hatch...
 
Lyte trip, this better be good or you're in for one of the worst public humiliations the earth has ever seen.
 
Lyte Trip said:
You guys asked.

My post was about building 7 and Larry Silverstein.
Click to expand...

Which has been dealt with and debunked a dozen times before. Use the search function on this forum (instead of investigoogling).

You might learn something :boxedin:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom