• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jason Bermas Back-Pedelling.

Scientologist said:
I have my suspicions as to who Lyte is. He sounds very cocky and misinformed. Who else could that be besides Dylan Avery or Jason Bermas himself.
Click to expand...

Incorrect.

And Skeptic4Sure is not JDX.

This evidence and presentation will be totally independent of LC and PFT.
 
Lyte Trip said:
This evidence and presentation will be totally independent of LC and PFT.
Click to expand...

Just what I thought, they just want to top each other...

"See I can piss farther than you!"

Why don't you bring this evidence to the proper authorities Lyte?
 
Pardalis said:
Lyte trip, this better be good or you're in for one of the worst public humiliations the earth has ever seen.
Click to expand...

If the NWO hasn't got rid of him by then.
FEMA death camp is no vacation!
 
Pardalis said:
Just what I thought, they just want to top each other...

"See I can piss farther than you!"

Why don't you bring this evidence to the proper authorities Lyte?
Click to expand...

Wrong.

We simply obtained the evidence and are working to release it as soon as possible. I am sure that the LC and PFT crews will back it 100%.

Not sure who the "proper authorities" are on this matter but we most certainly will be bringing to anyone and everyone possible and documenting all official responses.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Cool.

Then maybe you can come up with your own.

You're going to have to because there is NO WAY you or anybody can debunk our north of the citgo evidence.
Click to expand...

You may be correct, as I am beginning to suspect that there is no north of the Citgo evidence to debunk.

Its going to be the same half baked garbage that Russell had a field day with during the last dying days of the old LC forum.

The only difference is that this time is you guys are going to try to make a few bucks off of it.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

We simply obtained the evidence and are working to release it as soon as possible. I am sure that the LC and PFT crews will back it 100%.

Not sure who the "proper authorities" are on this matter but we most certainly will be bringing to anyone and everyone possible and documenting all official responses.
Click to expand...

The proper authorities would be any court of law since you are talking about the murder of a lot of people.

Where's the evidence?
 
Did I just miss something here?

Lyle you said you had evidence that nobody would question but it has been because you have no idea what happened to the lampposts.

You cannot put forward a thesis that excluded all the know facts.

Now tell me where did the aircraft approach from, how did the lampposts get damaged and then where did it go.

Then tell how all the DNA from the passengers all the plane parts and both black boxes ended up inside the Pentagon.

Ok so on you go.............
 
Not sure who the "proper authorities" are on this matter but we most certainly will be bringing to anyone and everyone possible and documenting all official responses.
Click to expand...

As has already been suggested, some sort of court. Or even a respected media outlet. Somebody who could actually action on your "evidence". Otherwise, what's the point?

Have you never wondered why the BBC or even Al Ja-bloody-zeera won't run with your crew's so-called evidence? It's because they would make themselves a laughing stock.
 
Last edited:
Should we contact the authorities ourselves Lyte, so that they can contact you?

ETA: maybe a subpoena?
 
Lyte Trip said:
You're going to have to because there is NO WAY you or anybody can debunk our north of the citgo evidence.
Click to expand...

You're right its pretty IMPOSSIBLE to debunk non-evidence that you don't have the balls to present.

Its fairly indicative of your gullibility that you already believe you have bulletproof evidence yet this evidence is not even ready to show us here today.
 
Lyte, as part of the image you posted as evidence to counter the general held view that a Plane hit the Pentagon from the south, you cite 'Serious' and 'Severe' in the key. Can you please define these values for us?

Is this based on a level of damage recorded from an 'official source'?
If not is it based on an inspection by a third party?
Is it based on interpritation by one or more people?
When was the evidence collected, regardless of the belief or point of view of the person that collated it?
What criteria was used to mark the change from 'serious' to 'severe'?
What do you mean by the term 'Serious'?
What do you mean by the term 'Severe'?

This will not undermine any evidence you or others wish to provide 'on air' at any time in the future. It will simply clarify the image you have provided for us.
 
stateofgrace said:
Did I just miss something here?

Lyle you said you had evidence that nobody would question but it has been because you have no idea what happened to the lampposts.

You cannot put forward a thesis that excluded all the know facts.

Now tell me where did the aircraft approach from, how did the lampposts get damaged and then where did it go.

Then tell how all the DNA from the passengers all the plane parts and both black boxes ended up inside the Pentagon.

Ok so on you go.............
Click to expand...

Wrong.

None of you have been able to demonstrate the physical damage as having been caused from the plane if it flew on the North side.

If you can not.....our evidence will prove that the physical damage was staged which in turn proves 9/11 an inside job.

It is not our responsibility to prove any details beyond which we have evidence for.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

None of you have been able to demonstrate the physical damage as having been caused from the plane if it flew on the North side.

If you can not.....our evidence will prove that the physical damage was staged which in turn proves 9/11 an inside job.

It is not our responsibility to prove any details beyond which we have evidence for.
Click to expand...

WHERE.IS.THE.EVIDENCE?

ETA: if you make accusations, the burden of proof is on you.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

None of you have been able to demonstrate the physical damage as having been caused from the plane if it flew on the North side.

If you can not.....our evidence will prove that the physical damage was staged which in turn proves 9/11 an inside job.

It is not our responsibility to prove any details beyond which we have evidence for.
Click to expand...

Present. Your. Evidence.

ETA: The Fire beat me to it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom