• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jason Bermas Back-Pedelling.

The_Fire said:
I would think either the Feds, Homeland Security or the everyday police would be VERY interested......
Click to expand...

The authorities would order them to submit their evidence... right now, instead of us having to wait weeks for an annoying piece of viedo on youtube...

So shall we do that Lyte, contact the authorities ourselves?
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

None of you have been able to demonstrate the physical damage as having been caused from the plane if it flew on the North side.

If you can not.....our evidence will prove that the physical damage was staged which in turn proves 9/11 an inside job.

It is not our responsibility to prove any details beyond which we have evidence for.
Click to expand...


Let's see the proof. Cmon, stallion. Lets see it. Stop talking about what you can prove and prove it.
 
Burrell said:
Lyte, as part of the image you posted as evidence to counter the general held view that a Plane hit the Pentagon from the south, you cite 'Serious' and 'Severe' in the key. Can you please define these values for us?

Is this based on a level of damage recorded from an 'official source'?
If not is it based on an inspection by a third party?
Is it based on interpritation by one or more people?
When was the evidence collected, regardless of the belief or point of view of the person that collated it?
What criteria was used to mark the change from 'serious' to 'severe'?
What do you mean by the term 'Serious'?
What do you mean by the term 'Severe'?

This will not undermine any evidence you or others wish to provide 'on air' at any time in the future. It will simply clarify the image you have provided for us.
Click to expand...

That image comes directly from the ASCE report.

I reccomend you read it in preparation for what we will present.

www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

If the damage to the pentagon was caused by a plane it could ONLY have been caused by a plane approaching from the south west.

We will definitively show this is not what happened.
 
Pardalis said:
The authorities would order them to submit their evidence... right now, instead of us having to wait weeks for an annoying piece of viedo on youtube...

So shall we do that Lyte, contact the authorities ourselves?
Click to expand...

Speaking of which: Does having evidence of a crime and not submitting them right away not constitute aiding and abetting? And if so, should people whom are aware of such a withhold not report that to the police? If that's so, it would be our duty to make sure that lyte is reported to aid justice.......
 
Lyte Trip said:
It is not our responsibility to prove any details beyond which we have evidence for.
Click to expand...

The DNA of the passengers found in the Pentagon is hard science. You seem to only have some new witnesses. Which do you think most reasonable people will believe?
 
Lyte Trip said:
That image comes directly from the ASCE report.

I reccomend you read it in preparation for what we will present.

www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

If the damage to the pentagon was caused by a plane it could ONLY have been caused by a plane approaching from the south west.

We will definitively show this is not what happened.
Click to expand...

Where's your evidence? Why have you not submitted said evidence to the proper authoritative organisation? Are you aware that you are possibly commiting a crime by withholding said evidence?
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

None of you have been able to demonstrate the physical damage as having been caused from the plane if it flew on the North side.

If you can not.....our evidence will prove that the physical damage was staged which in turn proves 9/11 an inside job.

It is not our responsibility to prove any details beyond which we have evidence for.
Click to expand...

By all means, make up all the Bizarro World Rules you wish.

Just don't expect your "evidence" to convince anyone outside the rapidly dwindling pool of twoofers, unless you adhere to the same standards of evidence and accountability that the rest of the world abides by.

Then again, why do any real work if the true objective is to peddle a few DVD's.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

None of you have been able to demonstrate the physical damage as having been caused from the plane if it flew on the North side.

If you can not.....our evidence will prove that the physical damage was staged which in turn proves 9/11 an inside job.

It is not our responsibility to prove any details beyond which we have evidence for.
Click to expand...

That we here could not hypothetically debunk what you refuse to even tell us about, would not mean that it was an accurate representation of the truth, nor that 9/11 was an inside job. Even if you were able to conclusively prove the official story to be wrong, it still would not follow that 9/11 was an inside job.

Are you familiar with the term "false dichotomy"?
 
Alt+F4 said:
The DNA of the passengers found in the Pentagon is hard science. You seem to only have some new witnesses. Which do you think most reasonable people will believe?
Click to expand...

Unverifiable evidence.

I am certain that people will believe what we present more.

Not a single jrefer will be able to doubt it unless you come up with some ludicrous conspiracy theory.
 
Big Les said:
That we here could not hypothetically debunk what you refuse to even tell us about, would not mean that it was an accurate representation of the truth, nor that 9/11 was an inside job. Even if you were able to conclusively prove the official story to be wrong, it still would not follow that 9/11 was an inside job.

Are you familiar with the term "false dichotomy"?
Click to expand...

Explain how the plane could have passed on the north side of the citgo station and still cause the damage to the pentagon and you will have a point here.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Unverifiable evidence.

I am certain that people will believe what we present more.

Not a single jrefer will be able to doubt it unless you come up with some ludicrous conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...

I hope you are proud of what you are doing?[/sarcasm]

Go lie into the faces of the families of the AA77 and Pentagon victims if you dare, you [rule8] :mad:
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

None of you have been able to demonstrate the physical damage as having been caused from the plane if it flew on the North side.

If you can not.....our evidence will prove that the physical damage was staged which in turn proves 9/11 an inside job.

It is not our responsibility to prove any details beyond which we have evidence for.
Click to expand...

WRONG.

The burden of proof does not lie with a single person on this forum it lies with you. You are the one presenting the new evidence. It is your burden to prove this evidence is credible and within keeping with all the known facts. If you cannot carry this burden your evidence is not worth the paper it is written.

Carry your burden and back up your evidence with all the known facts. Do as you have been requested, take it to the authorities. You won’t because you know the rest of the evidence simply decimates your new explosive evidence.

So do it, stop mouthing off, stop posting,log off, lift the phone and get in touch with the authorities, or are you protecting murderers?
 
Lyte Trip said:
Explain how the plane could have passed on the north side of the citgo station and still cause the damage to the pentagon and you will have a point here.
Click to expand...

It couldn't have.


But that is okay cause it didn't go that way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom