• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

It's their CULTURE, you INSENSITIVE creature!

Your moronic post didn't make sense, perhaps its because you have no concept of irony?

No, your logic does not make sense. Mine was not moronic to someone with a grasp of logic.


Anyhoo - So you condone the sexual mutilation of children as long as it does not take place in Sweden?
 
You have a linky/article that covers this? 'Tis of more than passing interest.

http://www.meforum.org/1629/is-female-genital-mutilation-an-islamic-problem

Those defending the practice seem to be citing the following hadith:

"When you circumcise then do not cut severely, since that is better for her and more pleasing to the husband." (Reported by Abu Dawud and Al-Baihaqee and declared Hasan by Shaikh Al-Albani)

http://www.themuslimwoman.com/hygiene/femalecircumcision.htm

This apears to me a call for restraint and not a recomendation to do such a thing.
 
What about MGM? No-one seems to want to talk about that? Especially the OP.

Fascinating, isn't it? Even without the implications of criticising specific cultures that practise MGM, there's the ingrained, possibly even inate, sexism...just not the sort of sexism that one sex likes to complain about. Remember boys - don't touch your own faeces, and be nice to women...but you can **** each other over all you like.
 
Make yearly medical examinations mandatory (might catch malaria, tubercolosis and other things too) and then make it clear to the parents that if their daughter is mutilated she will be taken from them ON THE SPOT and if they ever have a girl again she will be taken from them shortly after birth.

Great, make it so that these people won't take their children to the doctor, ever.
 
Forcefully deporting a UK citizen to Pakistan because their great grandfather originally came from there is excess punishment IMO.

That's just discrimination. Treating citizens differently because of their ancestry is nothing more than a human rights violation.
 
about some people's "oh, it's their own affairs, let them handle it". I can see them saying the same thing in the Drakaverse.:eek:
 
While widely practiced in some Islamic countries its a cultural rather than religious practice. Christians in Africa are also perpetrating such abuse on their daughters.

That's why I added "racist" and "insensitive". I'm not claiming only Muslims practice this. Depending on who you condemn for doing it, the accusations by the "sensitivity brigade" will change accordingly.
 
Great, make it so that these people won't take their children to the doctor, ever.

I think doctors already ARE required to report child abuse like FGM, and screen for contagious diseases like TB. If someone tries to hide their children and not take them to the doctor, that's an additional crime.
 
i have no problem with Muslim women wearing Burkas. its their culture, but they should have to show their face. this is a safety issue.

if we can tolerate orthodox jewish men wearing all black pants, shirts, and hats, then we can tolerate muslim women wearing full burkas.
I don't think you know what a burkha is...
 
i have no problem with Muslim women wearing Burkas. its their culture, but they should have to show their face. this is a safety issue.

if we can tolerate orthodox jewish men wearing all black pants, shirts, and hats, then we can tolerate muslim women wearing full burkas.
Did you read the OP?
 
That's just discrimination. Treating citizens differently because of their ancestry is nothing more than a human rights violation.


Not to mention it's a violation of both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the citizenship laws of virtually every western country in the world.

One of the fundamental principles of citizenship is that you cannot prevent a citizen from living in their own country.
 
That's why I added "racist" and "insensitive". I'm not claiming only Muslims practice this. Depending on who you condemn for doing it, the accusations by the "sensitivity brigade" will change accordingly.

Why add the strawman thread title? Why confine it to FGM?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom