How come?
We are engineering a situation for Goy country to dismantle their nuclear systems eventually. Obama is helping do this for us. He will be well fed in retirement.
In meantime we continue to use media to make Zion nuclear a non issue while all focus is put on Iran nuke.
Hahaha. So YOU'RE one of those Jews who runs the world?
EDIT: Oh, and I love the idea that you can convince Pakistan and India to give up their nukes. I'd love to see that.
Zach Aviv,
You either are very comical or very disturbing. I'm not really sure which
No, I actually do know a great deal about the Middle East conflict.
thanks.
are we gonna have to put together a collection to make this guy go away?
are we gonna have to put together a collection to make this guy go away?
Outmanned, yes. Outgunned? No, not even close.
Actually, even the "outmanned" part is overblown, a few tens of thousands at the most and deployed along multiple borders, whereas the the coalition forces were concentrated so that they presented overwhelming superiority at the points of attack.
Outgunned referred only to specific weapons (ie., tanks, artillery, etc.,.), the fact that our individual weapons and the troops trained and skilled in their use were probably worth 10+ of their Iraqi equivilant isn't at issue, merely the physical hardware count. About the only battlefield weapon which we held clear advantage (physical as well as technological) in, was aircraft.
Of course, my point was that numerical superiority isn't the only, or even most important, consideration of importance in comparing the military strength and capacity of different nations.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5923670&postcount=42
I'll just keep posting this since I'm waiting for the response on TShaitanaku, an actual debater rather than Parky the troll.
Hardly helps Israeli national interest, or hardly helps what you wish were Israeli national interest?I assume because Israel will not be party to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, as the nation still refuses to confirm it has nukes. As anyone here knows, I'm generally a supporter of Israel, but this sort of attitude hardly helps.
Israel's nuclear weapons are the only variable that has prevented the Arab states from trying to liberate the West Bank.
No it isn't about Netanyahu specifically, but Israel long-held postion of nuclear ambiguity. Israel is 1 of the 4 that are part of the nuclear capable countries in the world that haven't signed NPT for their specific reasons.
States such as the apartheid state of Israel clearly cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons.
Um, why should Israel sign the NPT? Is it in thier national interest? I honestly don't know much about why they would or would not. What are the arguments for/against Israel signing the treaty.
If signing the treaty is not in their national interest, then you are the one thinking that they are somehow special, in that they should be forced to sign a treaty contrary to thier national interest.