You can answer this question by yourself:
What happened the days after 9/11?
September 16:
“New samples confirm previous reports that ambient air quality meets OSHA standards and consequently is not a cause for public concern,”
Environmental Protection Agency, 9/16/2001
(...) it is later learned that the press release was heavily edited under pressure from the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). Critical passages in the original draft were either deleted or modified to downplay public health risks posed by contaminants that were released into the air during the collapse of the World Trade Center.
Environmental Protection Agency, 8/21/2003 pdf file; Newsday, 8/26/2003
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a091601healthrisks#a091601healthrisks
Why did that happen?
September 14, 2001:
EPA spokeswoman Bonnie Bellow says, “There’s nothing at this point that indicates that business can’t resume” in the Wall Street area on Monday as scheduled.
Newsday, 9/15/2001
What is for me especially cynical:
Around 13 September one of EPA´s own buildings (next to Ground Zero) was tested positively for asbestos and was cleaned by professionals. Whereas in the same time, EPA recommended the public, to “vacuum everything, including air conditioning filters, and wipe all surfaces with a damp cloth, (...).”
Newsweek, 9/14/2001; Jenkins, 7/4/2003 pdf file
http://www.historycommons.org/conte...cks_2950#enviromental_impact_911_attacks_2950
Why does no one talk in the political arena and in the media about this scandal?
------------------------------------------------------
There we can donate for the 9/11 first responders, because they do not get the care from the government, they need:
http://www.fealgoodfoundation.com/
What happened the days after 9/11?
September 16:
“New samples confirm previous reports that ambient air quality meets OSHA standards and consequently is not a cause for public concern,”
Environmental Protection Agency, 9/16/2001
(...) it is later learned that the press release was heavily edited under pressure from the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). Critical passages in the original draft were either deleted or modified to downplay public health risks posed by contaminants that were released into the air during the collapse of the World Trade Center.
Environmental Protection Agency, 8/21/2003 pdf file; Newsday, 8/26/2003
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a091601healthrisks#a091601healthrisks
Why did that happen?
September 14, 2001:
EPA spokeswoman Bonnie Bellow says, “There’s nothing at this point that indicates that business can’t resume” in the Wall Street area on Monday as scheduled.
Newsday, 9/15/2001
What is for me especially cynical:
Around 13 September one of EPA´s own buildings (next to Ground Zero) was tested positively for asbestos and was cleaned by professionals. Whereas in the same time, EPA recommended the public, to “vacuum everything, including air conditioning filters, and wipe all surfaces with a damp cloth, (...).”
Newsweek, 9/14/2001; Jenkins, 7/4/2003 pdf file
http://www.historycommons.org/conte...cks_2950#enviromental_impact_911_attacks_2950
Why does no one talk in the political arena and in the media about this scandal?
------------------------------------------------------
There we can donate for the 9/11 first responders, because they do not get the care from the government, they need:
http://www.fealgoodfoundation.com/