• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Is the Goverment able to kill their own people?

bio

Muse
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
883
You can answer this question by yourself:

What happened the days after 9/11?

September 16:
“New samples confirm previous reports that ambient air quality meets OSHA standards and consequently is not a cause for public concern,”
Environmental Protection Agency, 9/16/2001

(...) it is later learned that the press release was heavily edited under pressure from the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). Critical passages in the original draft were either deleted or modified to downplay public health risks posed by contaminants that were released into the air during the collapse of the World Trade Center.
Environmental Protection Agency, 8/21/2003 pdf file; Newsday, 8/26/2003
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a091601healthrisks#a091601healthrisks

Why did that happen?

September 14, 2001:
EPA spokeswoman Bonnie Bellow says, “There’s nothing at this point that indicates that business can’t resume” in the Wall Street area on Monday as scheduled.
Newsday, 9/15/2001


What is for me especially cynical:


Around 13 September one of EPA´s own buildings (next to Ground Zero) was tested positively for asbestos and was cleaned by professionals. Whereas in the same time, EPA recommended the public, to “vacuum everything, including air conditioning filters, and wipe all surfaces with a damp cloth, (...).”
Newsweek, 9/14/2001; Jenkins, 7/4/2003 pdf file
http://www.historycommons.org/conte...cks_2950#enviromental_impact_911_attacks_2950

Why does no one talk in the political arena and in the media about this scandal?​
​

------------------------------------------------------

There we can donate for the 9/11 first responders, because they do not get the care from the government, they need:
http://www.fealgoodfoundation.com/
 
Starting threads absent of fallacies and poor grammar will result in more constructive discourse.
 
IS there any evidence of anyone other than Ground Zero workers suffering health problems due to WTC dust?

An EPA announcement on general air quality in Manhattan is not the same as an announcement on air quality while working at Ground Zero itself. Use of face masks at all times was mandatory however a lot of workers failed to wear them due to their own laziness/lack of care.
 
IS there any evidence of anyone other than Ground Zero workers suffering health problems due to WTC dust?

An EPA announcement on general air quality in Manhattan is not the same as an announcement on air quality while working at Ground Zero itself. Use of face masks at all times was mandatory however a lot of workers failed to wear them due to their own laziness/lack of care.

Why did not the government prevent that?
 
Man the government must really hate rescue workers to go through all the trouble of concocting 9/11, risking their own lives and reputations, just to kill some through cancer. That's where you're going with this right? That the government staged terrorist attacks just to give some iron workers lung cancer, right? Otherwise there isn't much point in even bringing up such allegations in here.
 
Why did not the government prevent that?

You think George Bush should have been there personally, walking around and slapping masks on people who ignored the mandatory advice?
 
Is the Goverment able to kill their own people?

Yes, if it is politically expedient. It is a grave error to assume that governments identify with "their own people". People with power identify with themselves and their own kind.
 
Anyhoo, addressing the OP, Gypsum and calcite are known to cause irritation of the mucus membranes of the eyes and respiratory tract. The rescue workers knew this. One would think they had something else on their minds.
 
Yes, if it is politically expedient. It is a grave error to assume that governments identify with "their own people". People with power identify with themselves and their own kind.

Trying to explain the behavior of a hypothetical construct is a waste of time.
 
Anyhoo, addressing the OP, Gypsum and calcite are known to cause irritation of the mucus membranes of the eyes and respiratory tract. The rescue workers knew this. One would think they had something else on their minds.

Weren´t the workers warned because they had to know?
 
Yes, if it is politically expedient. It is a grave error to assume that governments identify with "their own people". People with power identify with themselves and their own kind.

Dead end job? No prospects? No-one notices you?

Rail at those better off than yourself, it will make you feel better, however silly you come across to readers.

Please keep in mind the Membership Agreement and do not use personal attacks to argue your point.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks like some people got the message.

jpayne-2001Sep22-004-pr.jpg


search-and-rescue-firefighter.jpg
 
Why did not the government prevent that?

So we've established that the government didn't kill its own people, it simply failed to enforce personal protective equipment regulations in a hazardous area. Nice to see those strawmen burn.

Simple answer: people are stupid. PPE regulations are impossible to enforce unless there are supervisors breathing down the necks of everyone, all the time. This is why, for example, in British law there is a duty of care on everyone in a workplace to make reasonable efforts to ensure that everyone including themself is using PPE and working in a safe manner; unless you have a catch-all, everyone can say it's somebody else's problem, and everyone will backslide.

No doubt the government could, by virtue of massive effort, enforced PPE regulations rigorously at Ground Zero, and some European governments probably would have. It would have cost more and achieved less, of course. My uninformed impression, as an outsider, is that the American approach tends more towards encouraging individual responsibility; make the equipment available, give clear guidelines as to its use - and there is no question that all that was done - then leave it to individuals to decide how much they value their own health.

Are you suggesting that the US Government should intervene more in the management of its people's behaviour?

Dave
 
So we've established that the government didn't kill its own people, it simply failed to enforce personal protective equipment regulations in a hazardous area. Nice to see those strawmen burn.

Simple answer: people are stupid. PPE regulations are impossible to enforce unless there are supervisors breathing down the necks of everyone, all the time. This is why, for example, in British law there is a duty of care on everyone in a workplace to make reasonable efforts to ensure that everyone including themself is using PPE and working in a safe manner; unless you have a catch-all, everyone can say it's somebody else's problem, and everyone will backslide.

No doubt the government could, by virtue of massive effort, enforced PPE regulations rigorously at Ground Zero, and some European governments probably would have. It would have cost more and achieved less, of course. My uninformed impression, as an outsider, is that the American approach tends more towards encouraging individual responsibility; make the equipment available, give clear guidelines as to its use - and there is no question that all that was done - then leave it to individuals to decide how much they value their own health.

Are you suggesting that the US Government should intervene more in the management of its people's behaviour?

Dave

yes of course - besides that, it is unclear, weather the first responders were warned at all. Can you prove that?
 
IS there any evidence of anyone other than Ground Zero workers suffering health problems due to WTC dust?

An EPA announcement on general air quality in Manhattan is not the same as an announcement on air quality while working at Ground Zero itself. Use of face masks at all times was mandatory however a lot of workers failed to wear them due to their own laziness/lack of care.

Can you prove, that EPA excluded the air over Ground Zero in their statement? If not, then their statement included the air at Ground Zero.

About what kind of masks are you writing about ... do you have more information / references?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom