Professor Yaffle
Butterbeans and Breadcrumbs
I totally understand what you are saying. Not.
Oops, children calling and I neglected to proofread my post.
I totally understand what you are saying. Not.
My point is its not like schizophrenia or cancer in that you condition yourself to become this way because of the choices you make. That's why I have a probably sympathizing with anorexics or alcoholics.
Anorexics and alcoholics don't condition themselves to become that way because of choices they make.
Just because you die from it doesn't give me a reason to believe it is a disease. People die from car wrecks. That does not make it a disease.
That is why it seems more to me like alcoholism and not like schizophrenia. You can't help it when you have schizophrenia.
I totally understand what you are saying. Not.
Pony up dude, where is your evidence?Actually there is also a blood test that people take to see if they have schizophrenia. I have a friend who suffers from this as well.
You came in with a chip on your shoulder, how much research have you done to inform your stigmatizing opinion?The whole point of this thread is so I can have a better understanding of anorexia. You are resorting to personal attacks and not doing anything to teach me, only insult me. I am not trying to take the place of a mental health professional.
No excuse for the statements you made about anorexics or people whos elf mutilate. there are some who do it for attention and those who don't.My whole point of coming to this forum is to learn. Yes, I have my opinions of things and they can be callous at times but I am willing to change my opinion if I am given the proper information.
And what is the co-morbidity of bipolar disorder and alcoholism. Hmmm?I have no respect for alcoholics but schizophrenics are an entirely different matter.
Ok dude, its obvious that you missed my point in the title and the OP. You have not given me any evidence to suggest that I should think otherwise. I would like to hear from someone who is more professional.
Frankly, alcoholism and anorexia's end result is disease and death so I don't get your point at all.
A question for Epok.
Do you have any habits you have ever thought you should break, but have failed to actually make the effort?
Could be anything- untidiness, smoking, masturbation, talking too loudly, not washing the dishes for days?
None of these is likely to kill you, though they might induce someone else to- but if you think about what actually happens in your head when you consider taking action then fail,- maybe this is exactly what happens in the similar, but more harmful case of someone displaying anorexic behaviour?
I listened yesterday to a radio interview with a man who developed agoraphobia after a panic attack. What he described sounded to my unqualified ears like a neural event of some sort- fit, stroke, something. It got me wondering how many aberrant behaviours arise from such an event. If there's anything to this, the behaviour itself is not an illness; it's a consequence of a neural problem that may have occurred years before- just as a limp is not a disease, but may be a consequence of a fall years ago.
I agree with you that some folk do use the "I'm ill" excuse, when they seem to be just lazy , self indulgent and weak willed. but that doesn't mean all behavioural disorders are imaginary.
It can be hard to tell sometimes.
The end result of many risky behaviors that are completely voluntary can be death as well. Is drug smuggling a disease? Is smoking a disease? The point he is trying to argue is about responsibility. When we say someone has a disease, it removes or at least reduces responsibility for the behavior in question. If someone has Tuorette's, we excuse their behavior; they aren't responsible for what they say, it's a disease. If smoking (which is essentially identical to alchoholism without the added fatalities from car accidents) is considered a disease, merely labelling it so will reduce the responsibility of smokers in the minds of many.
Some people want to, through labelling, remove all responsibility for some voluntary behaviors. Others want to completely ignore the effects of brain chemistry on behaviors. The problem is that we want a binary answer to whether something is a disease or not, when in reality it is a continuum.
You have presented no evidence that there is not a biological basis for anorexia nervosa. Just your opinion.
The end result of many risky behaviors that are completely voluntary can be death as well. Is drug smuggling a disease? Is smoking a disease? The point he is trying to argue is about responsibility. When we say someone has a disease, it removes or at least reduces responsibility for the behavior in question. If someone has Tuorette's, we excuse their behavior; they aren't responsible for what they say, it's a disease. If smoking (which is essentially identical to alchoholism without the added fatalities from car accidents) is considered a disease, merely labelling it so will reduce the responsibility of smokers in the minds of many.
Some people want to, through labelling, remove all responsibility for some voluntary behaviors. Others want to completely ignore the effects of brain chemistry on behaviors. The problem is that we want a binary answer to whether something is a disease or not, when in reality it is a continuum.
Some people, that is not a qualifier you used in the OP, there are people who use anything as an excuse.That makes a lot more sense than a lot the replies I have been getting. I could concede that there are some extreme cases that are not brought on by choice. But I do feel that some people use it as an excuse, such as alcoholics.
Sounds like you needed Jack Trimpey and rational recovery. Twelve step programs are not the best place to gauge a disorder or process.I did go through a period where I was drinking excessively (everyday) but I eventually came to my senses after I got a DUI and had to go to an AA meeting. After hearing these people say how helpless they were and calling themselves losers I decided I just needed to make a conscious effort to stop what I was doing and to quit being selfish.
I still drink every now and then but I don't go to the excesses that I used to. Thanks for bringing up a good point.
And to qualify each of those is major like:(3) alcohol is often used in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended
(4) there is a persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control alcohol use
(5) a great deal of time is spent in activities necessary to obtain alcohol, use alcohol, or recover from its effects
(6) important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up or reduced because of alcohol use
(7) alcohol use is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent or recurrent physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or exacerbated by alcohol (e.g. continued drinking despite recognition that an ulcer was made worse by alcohol consumption)
I can't prove that there isn't an omnipotent god but it is up to the believer to prove that there is.
Your burden.but I don't have a good reason to believe it for a few reasons: its not like testing for cancer or schizophrenia, people say "its a disease" seemingly as an excuse to not own up to their own actions (similar to the way alcoholics and addicts do), the pity factor with which sufferers seem to love, and the fact that you are not born with it or that you are consciously hurting yourself for selfish reasons (again the same way alcoholics, addicts and even cutters do).
Pony up dude, where is your evidence?
I worked in mental health until three years ago, and in fact i was doing ER screens for psych admissions.
So data, evidence, what test? Is it a dopamine spill test or what?
You came in with a chip on your shoulder, how much research have you done to inform your stigmatizing opinion?
Hmmm, did you read the PubMed links?
No excuse for the statements you made about anorexics or people whos elf mutilate. there are some who do it for attention and those who don't.
If you start rude you get rude.
Where is your evidence that it is not a biological process in part?
Hmm, debating a friend and just making stuff up?
And what is the co-morbidity of bipolar disorder and alcoholism. Hmmm?
You use the same debate tactics and styles to defame those with anorexia nervosa, claim it to be the product of self pity and present no evidence? Same stuff i used to hear from people about schizophrenia?From what I know there is no cure for schizophrenia and not once in my OP did I insult anyone for having schizophrenia (and for that matter cancer or diabetes).
"the pity factor with which sufferers seem to love, and the fact that you are not born with it or that you are consciously hurting yourself for selfish reasons"
So you want me to treat you better than you do people living with a condition you are lacking knowledge of. Sure.
I did, you just avoided it, there is lots of data which suggests a biological basis as part of the process, you have prersented any period.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/...nel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/...nel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/...nel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
I an come with more, that was from a minute look at PubMed, so what have you got?