• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

'I'm either too black or not black enough': One teenager's experience

As far as her assertion goes - no I mean it when I say that I've heard it quite a few times before, likely distorted to "slavery trauma is encoded in our DNA" due to people's misunderstanding of what studies *actually* say. Much like, say, the assertion the doctors *injected* black men with syphilis in the Tuskeegee Experiment (the reality is that they simply did not treat syphilis in black men who showed up - which is clearly bad enough), or Elon Musk's more goofball ideas. It's disturbingly common even among college graduates who haven't actually studied biology, and largely due to a combination of (justified) wariness and poor science reporting - and simple fallible human memory.



There was a recent "blackface" blowup on either Twitch, involving a Lithuanian cosplayer who colored her skin brown to cosplay as an Apex Legends character. In short, she was banned for a month, which likely affects her income. Full story, and a photo of her in cosplay, here.

Had she been an American adult, I'd expect her to know better (it's worth noting that black cosplayers in the US almost never lighten their skin just to look like a white American or an anime character - unless the character is actually, like, #FFFFFF on the usual RGB scale). However, she has stated outright that she had no idea that this was considered offensive, that she was simply doing her best to look like the character. I think it's reasonable to let her off the hook at least this once, especially looking at the photo of her in Cosplay, which is *clearly* not historical blackface. You have to allow for these misunderstandings when going between such far-flung cultures. And while I'm okay with a teen being extra sensitive - they're teens, of course they'll be like that - it would do everyone well to discuss the matter rather than venting in some newspaper article.

And Twitch action was completely 100% wrong. And complainers should have been kicked so hard that they'd get free trip to Pluto to thing about their terminal idiocy.

She should be free to cosplay as she wants without terminal idiots being able to harm her online activities.

===

As for author in linked article: Dumb ignorant self-centered American.
 
I would suspect that she wrote "Hindu" in ignorance, but it was changed for the .co.uk version, either initially or in reaction to complaints. Religions obviously don't have accents. That said, ISTR that historically all Indians in the US were once referred to Hindus, even if they were Sikh, Muslim, Christian, or whatever.


If you are one of the Woke, those terms are all obsolete, and replaced with People 'of Colour', hence the confusion.
 
Indians. Of course, Native Americans are sometimes called "Indians," as well, but people writing in a formal context are pretty good these days about using the proper labels.

I would imagine that in the UK, where there isn't a Native American population that was mistakenly labelled as "Indian," there wouldn't be a reason to call Indians anything other than Indians in formal writing.

Well, they might be referred to as "Asian" if the observer wasn't 100% sure of which bit of the sub-continent they came from.
 
Well, they might be referred to as "Asian" if the observer wasn't 100% sure of which bit of the sub-continent they came from.

For years, "Asian" was the common "not-WOG" designation in England for anyone from the Indian sub-continent. Nowadays we get more specific. South Asia is better than ISC because Sri Lankans, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis all have various histories with India, the country, and prefer it. (Include Nepal and Bhutan in there.)

South Asians - formerly Indian Sub-Continent all those darker hued muslim and hindu and sikh types. And a couple of million buddhists for good measure.

Southeast Asia - every thing coming' round the bend there fome "after Bangladesh" down to Aussie coastal waters and north to the southern border of China. Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Viet Nam, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Brunei, Timor, Papua New Guinea, Philippines

East Asia - CN (inclu HK/MA), JP, KO, TW

ETA: Forgot why I originally wanted to post in this thread.

Just what relevance do the thoughts of an American ex-pat living in Europe have to "the world scene". I can connect the Beeb with American or French ex-pat kids growing up in Japan, Singapore or Beijing. Unless the kid is particularly poetic (she ain't), I have as much interest in her findings as those of a Lithuanian teen growing up in Adelaide.
 
Last edited:
For years, "Asian" was the common "not-WOG" designation in England for anyone from the Indian sub-continent. Nowadays we get more specific. South Asia is better than ISC because Sri Lankans, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis all have various histories with India, the country, and prefer it. (Include Nepal and Bhutan in there.)
Ironic slip there...

Seriously, though, you can only be specific if you know how to be specific. "Asian" in the context of South Asia is no different from "Black African" in the context of Africa, or "European" in the context of Europe, for that matter.
 

Back
Top Bottom