I wanted a taco last night.

Are Landmark's tactics force, fraud, or neither

  • Force

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Fraud

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Force and fraud

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Neither

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
kourama said:


Luxury!

When I was a lad we'd get up at 3:30 in the morning, half an hour before we went to bed. Drink a half-cup of HABINERO sauce, put a drop of tobasco in each eye, and chilli pepper up our bums. We'd walk 40 miles to the pepper mill (uphill both ways), work 25 hours for no pay, and when we got home, our father would drown us in pure capsaicin, and dance about on our graves!

You tell the kids of today that, and they won't believe ya!

Ah, yes, and here we are now, drinking Chateau de Chatilly wine...!

(Dinsdale....)
 
Roadtoad said:


Ah, yes, and here we are now, drinking Chateau de Chatilly wine...!

(Dinsdale....)

No dude, it's a paraphrased Monty Python sketch.

Wine makes me barf, actually. :(
 
I think he credited that with the 'Chateau de Chatilly wine' line, which was from the same skit.

So, are we going to decide who's a REAL tacoist and not?

Such as selecting people who have done things we disagree with and claiming that they're not ACTUAL tacoists because of that?

Or as Mojo Nixon says "Michael J. Fox has NO Elvis in him."

Bill Clinton ate a taco once....

And nobody has addressed my Horchata question. The very wine of the Taco sacrement.
 
evildave said:
I think he credited that with the 'Chateau de Chatilly wine' line, which was from the same skit.

So, are we going to decide who's a REAL tacoist and not?

Such as selecting people who have done things we disagree with and claiming that they're not ACTUAL tacoists because of that?

Or as Mojo Nixon says "Michael J. Fox has NO Elvis in him."

Bill Clinton ate a taco once....

And nobody has addressed my Horchata question. The very wine of the Taco sacrement.

I guess I'm a heathen as far as Horchata is concerned. What is it?
 
I guess I could put an egg roll inside a taco shell, and a couple of peanut butter cups. I could call it a Ba'hai taco.
 
arcticpenguin said:
I guess I could put an egg roll inside a taco shell, and a couple of peanut butter cups. I could call it a Ba'hai taco.

NO, NO, NO! YOU can't call it that! I can call it that, or Evil Dave can call it that, BUT YOU CAN'T CALL IT THAT!

(Some people...!)
 
arcticpenguin said:
I guess I could put an egg roll inside a taco shell, and a couple of peanut butter cups. I could call it a Ba'hai taco.

That sort of thing would kill you instantly, and you would go to Hell because the entire thing was in a taco shell, and therefore a taco.
 
evildave said:
But isn't Hell eternal separation from tacos?

Yes, because every taco you've eaten will be painfully extracted from your immortal soul.
 
evildave said:
I think he credited that with the 'Chateau de Chatilly wine' line, which was from the same skit.

*SNIP*

Really? Damn. My sketch memory is sketchy.
 
Northern Liberal Tacoism = A-Tacoism!!

You modern northern Tacoists don't know a thing about true tacos. Your liberal interpretation of the ATR (Ancient Taco Recipe) causes you to misinterpret simple recipe lines. When it says, "The tortilla may be covered with shreds" you don't understand that GTITS means it should be covered with SHREDS of beef. Some of you think that it means you can use shredded lettuce and ground beef. But even you know that that is not a true taco.

Also, Burritologists say that the BOB (Book of Burrito) is simple another page to be added onto the ATR. This belief is strengthened by the line in the ATR that reads, "A thin layer of beans holds it all together". They claim that the BOB was inspired by the GTITS to bring beans to the world and replace beef as the primary ingredient. What they fail to grasp is that a tortilla filled completely with beans is against the ATR and that it destroys the heart of a taco which is beef.
 
Re: Northern Liberal Tacoism = A-Tacoism!!

Dragonrock said:
You modern northern Tacoists don't know a thing about true tacos. Your liberal interpretation of the ATR (Ancient Taco Recipe) causes you to misinterpret simple recipe lines. When it says, "The tortilla may be covered with shreds" you don't understand that GTITS means it should be covered with SHREDS of beef. Some of you think that it means you can use shredded lettuce and ground beef. But even you know that that is not a true taco.

Also, Burritologists say that the BOB (Book of Burrito) is simple another page to be added onto the ATR. This belief is strengthened by the line in the ATR that reads, "A thin layer of beans holds it all together". They claim that the BOB was inspired by the GTITS to bring beans to the world and replace beef as the primary ingredient. What they fail to grasp is that a tortilla filled completely with beans is against the ATR and that it destroys the heart of a taco which is beef.

Damned elitists!
 
Re: Re: Northern Liberal Tacoism = A-Tacoism!!

Roadtoad said:


Damned elitists!

No, not elitists, we just understand the true nature of the Taco. I myself have gone back to the ATR and read it in it's original Mexican, before it was interpreted. It is truely a beautiful recipe describing ancient salsas and primeval guacamole. It's a thing that modern tacoists have forgotten. It is also something that the eggrollians never understand. One would think they would understand that a won-ton wrap is different from a tortilla, spicy mustard is not the same as salsa, and shrimp will never replace beef as the OTI (One True Ingredient). It is so sad that I understand and you do not, your a-tacoism will result in only your souls unending hunger.
 
Re: Re: Re: Northern Liberal Tacoism = A-Tacoism!!

Dragonrock said:


No, not elitists, we just understand the true nature of the Taco. I myself have gone back to the ATR and read it in it's original Mexican, before it was interpreted. It is truely a beautiful recipe describing ancient salsas and primeval guacamole. It's a thing that modern tacoists have forgotten. It is also something that the eggrollians never understand. One would think they would understand that a won-ton wrap is different from a tortilla, spicy mustard is not the same as salsa, and shrimp will never replace beef as the OTI (One True Ingredient). It is so sad that I understand and you do not, your a-tacoism will result in only your souls unending hunger.

Fie upon thee, for thy refusal to accept new revelation, chicken, and fish...
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Northern Liberal Tacoism = A-Tacoism!!

Roadtoad said:


Fie upon thee, for thy refusal to accept new revelation, chicken, and fish...

You poor misguided fool. Only shredded beef is the OTI and without the OTI you do not have a taco. I suppose you think taking a piece of baloney covering it with catsup then wrapping it in a piece of Wonder-bread would become a taco if you put a jalapeno in it. You a-tacoists are all the same, you don't get it.

ATR describes the OTI
OTI fills the taco
You eat the taco
the ATR fills you

Can you explain this? Can you? You silly a-tacoist.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Northern Liberal Tacoism = A-Tacoism!!

Dragonrock said:


You poor misguided fool. Only shredded beef is the OTI and without the OTI you do not have a taco. I suppose you think taking a piece of baloney covering it with catsup then wrapping it in a piece of Wonder-bread would become a taco if you put a jalapeno in it. You a-tacoists are all the same, you don't get it.

ATR describes the OTI
OTI fills the taco
You eat the taco
the ATR fills you

Can you explain this? Can you? You silly a-tacoist.

Nay, NEVER! Baloney is not even MEAT, Elitist Swine! Nor is ketchup even considered food, and do not even think of starting about "Wonder Bread." (Permit me to pause here for a moment whilst I violently evacuate my middens...)

OTI should not be limited to mean "ONE True Ingredient," but perhaps should be taken to mean "ORIGINAL True Ingredient." Where is your sense of adventure, which would make you a True Tacoist? HAH! (I thought so! You lack one!) Indeed, one sees it all now! You hide behind a faux-orthodoxy of Tacoism, while seeking to squelch the quest for True Tacoism, the Inexhaustible Quest for Taco Truth!

Indeed, we see it all now in your jingoistic responses! (And ixnay on the claim that we would defile ourselves with HAMBURGER! Clearly, and Ad Hom if there ever was one!)

I relieve myself in your general direction...!:D
 
What about fajitas? (A lesser symbol of Tacoism). I have tried to explain that "fajita" literally means "flank steak", therefore there can be no such thing as "shrimp fajitas". Or at least they would have to be very small.
 

Back
Top Bottom