quoted again for understanding to others.
Can you explain to me what you mean by "external source within yourself"?
quoted again for understanding to others.
quoted again for understanding to others.
rorylee said:The feeling you get when drunk is exactly as real as any other feeling. Just because an emotion/feeling is partly caused by externally sourced chemicals doesn't make it any less real. This is something many people who criticise alcohol don't seem to understand.
You said it!! now use that thought pattern as a 'woo' also. (omg i said woo!!! lol)
quoted again for understanding to others.The feeling you get as a 'psychic or woo' is exactly as real as any other feeling. Just because an emotion/feeling is partly caused by external source within yourself doesn't make it any less real. This is something many people who criticise 'psychics or woo's' don't seem to understand.
i had a feeling that text was gonna get picked out, i changed it numerous times cause it can suit anything on the way a psychic gets his or hers info, just like you get drunk from chemicals.
i had a feeling that text was gonna get picked out, i changed it numerous times cause it can suit anything on the way a psychic gets his or hers info, just like you get drunk from chemicals.
Beer has a discernable effect.
i had a feeling that text was gonna get picked out, i changed it numerous times cause it can suit anything on the way a psychic gets his or hers info, just like you get drunk from chemicals.
Woo is like non-alcoholic beer.
There I fixed it for you.
Same for a guy who drinks a lot and drives their car.
Not quite. The difference being that there is indisputable evidence to indicate that being drunk makes one's reaction times slower and therefore less capable of driving a vehicle with due care and attention. The evidence suggesting that second hand smoke is harmful to health is contradictory at best.
Is this topic drift? Apologies if I am derailing the thread away from the OP, we can have this smoking discussion elsewhere.
Perhaps...I predict that the more someone like beer, the less they will like the analogy
Is this topic drift?
In order to continue this discussion, we'd have to prove or disprove that second hand smoke is harmful.
If only it was that simple eh? Is inhaling smoke harmful... errrrmmm????
The actual question is "Is inhaling smoke as harmful as we are told it is"
That's the question no one (without an agenda) seems to be able to answer.
So, good luck with that.
[qimg]http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg117/ThePsychoClown/TopHat-Cigarette2.jpg[/qimg]