Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Synchronicity has been described as "the co-incident occurrence of two or more causally unrelated events that have the same meaning" [my italics]. It is that last part that causes all the problems, because meaning is something imposed on events by us.

Remember, Information is not knowledge; Knowledge is not Wisdom; Wisdom is not truth; Truth is not beauty; Beauty is not love; Love is not music; Music is the best.
Frank Zappa
 
Yes, I'm sure you will. You'll go on adding even more more constants, more links, more "synchronicities", more tortured arithmetic, and above all more "evidence", more weasel words, and more non-predictions based on more non-events, until eventually Hyper Dimensional Design achieves its ultimate goal: linking everything together while explaining nothing at all.
The most profound explanation has just been given to you ( Tunguska ), you just dismiss it, taht's all. You need to look at the timing and content of my posts.
 
The symbolism of this synchronicity is clear: This is about the real origin of meteorites, this is about the real origin and meaning of the ‘Tunguska event’.
Changing Opinions: Fireball Likely Not Part of Soyuz Rocket
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/03/31/changing-opinions-fireball-likely-not-part-of-soyuz-rocket/
Officials are now saying the bright fireball seen over Virginia in the US on Sunday was probably a natural meteor event and not part of a Russian rocket, a reversal from yesterday's initial analysis.
 
Its an intuitive thought or synchronicity yes, unveiling the hidden underlying design instantly. I talk about 'Tunguska' and suddenly these 'Tunguska' synchronicties are popping up. This happens all the time while doing my 'research'. I can be at work, have an idea, check it and recognize the synchronicities instantly. yes.
Anything can be linked to everything, but that doesn't mean that any of those connections hold any meaning. It is for this reason that most people have a BS filter.
 
The most profound explanation has just been given to you ( Tunguska ), you just dismiss it, taht's all. You need to look at the timing and content of my posts.
I saw nothing profound at all. All I saw was you linking the Tunguska event to Deep Impact for reasons that I don't comprehend, and you linking that same event to a minor aircraft incident in Hiroshima for reasons that make no sense whatsoever.

And the second part of my conclusion still stands: even if they are linked in some fashion, they don't explain a darned thing.
 
I saw nothing profound at all. All I saw was you linking the Tunguska event to Deep Impact for reasons that I don't comprehend, and you linking that same event to a minor aircraft incident in Hiroshima for reasons that make no sense whatsoever.

And the second part of my conclusion still stands: even if they are linked in some fashion, they don't explain a darned thing.

" a minor aircraft incident in Hiroshima "

Blue.......I don't know if you deliberately changing my posts or that you are just plain...

That minor aircraft incident IN Hirhoshima you talk about are the moments of decission and the military order to drop an atomic bomb on Hirhoshima.

That's what I said

Read again

Tunguska happened at THE moment in order to mark the Phi point between Tunguska and Deep Impact. This phipoint marks the moment that it was decided to uses nuclear arms on Japan.

This 'Hirshosima crash' ( reread previous posts about the identification ) happened on August 6 2005, THE moment with at Phi point in between Tunguska the moment the military order to use nuclear weapons was given

So both Tunguska and the Hirhoshima crash happened on an intelligently designed moment in our perception of time, marking Deep Impact and Hirhoshima-Nagasaki.

they don't explain a darned thing

Tunguska can happen at any intelligently Designed moment in our perception of time, seems pretty obvious to me
 
April 8, 2009 - 2 Mars years in Earth days from Deep Impact on Templ I
Nuclear Tension North Korea
1 Mars year was on the timeline first half 2007:
May 22, 2007 - 1 Mars Year since Deep Impact
Ice Age blast 'ravaged America'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6676461.stm

New Clovis-Age Comet Impact Theory
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/New_Clovis_Age_Comet_Impact_Theory_999.html
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=229&mforum=hddesign
North Korea says it will send a communications satellite into orbit between April 4 and 8.
Timeline Q2, 2009
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=8127&mforum=hddesign#8127
 
Dutch said:
"don't mess with nuclear power and stay out of space"
You might have said it a lot, but we have repeatedly demonstrated no such major themes exist.
Well, I've said it before, but after all these pages it bears repeating that every nuclear power system launched by the U.S. worked exactly as designed. And that list doesn't include the SNAP-10A reactor (1965) or the isotope heat sources aboard the three Mars rovers. It's curious, isn't it, that we'd have such success in the face of these "two major themes" combined? (Dutch's reply was classic: "It depends on what you mean by successful.")

Jupiter, brought to you courtesy of nuclear power in space:
316231main_jupiterio_226.jpg


Saturn, brought to you courtesy of nuclear power in space:
images


Uranian moon Miranda, brought to you courtesy of nuclear power in space:
18.jpg


Neptune, brought to you courtesy of nuclear power in space:
neptune.gif
 
I never said that we can't, I have always said that we shouldn't

that's something completely different
 
I never said that we can't, I have always said that we shouldn't

that's something completely different
Nobody said you can't say we can't, we say you shouldn't say we shouldn't because your reasons do not use reason.
 
I can live with that, is it about destiny of mankind?
If you want to know what it is about, watch it :rolleyes:

By the way, the sinking of the Titanic and the Challenger space shuttle disaster are linked in a mysterious way that only I have figured out.
 
Really?

Maybe you can tell me than what STS-28 has been doing in space

April 14, 2009

Earth at same orbittal position as during the first return (STS-1) to Earth of space shuttle Columbia

Space Shuttle Columbia (NASA Orbiter Vehicle Designation: OV-102) was the first spaceworthy space shuttle in NASA's orbital fleet. Its first mission, STS-1, lasted from April 12 to April 14, 1981. On February 1, 2003, Columbia disintegrated during re-entry over Texas, on its 28th mission, killing all seven crew members.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Columbia

The last return of Columbia ended in desintegration on February 1, 2003.

The Golden Mean Phi point is again unveiling the hidden underlying Design

Phi point is August 12-13, 1989

and again space shuttle is returning from space, STS-28 is returning on the early morning of August 13, 1989

STS-28 was the third shuttle mission dedicated to United States Department of Defense, and first flight of Columbia since mission STS-61-C. The details of the mission are classified. The payload is widely believed to have been the first SDS-2 communications satellite. The mission was launched successfully on 8 August 1989. STS-28 lasted just over 5 days and traveled 2.1 million miles in 81 orbits of the earth. The altitude of the mission is classified, but based on the distance traveled and number of orbits, the altitude would have been between 220 km and 380 km. The shuttle landed at Edwards Air Force Base on runway 17.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-28

I have already posted here in the HDDesign material that Columbia was taken out by Design.

I don't know what STS-28 was doing out there in space, but it seems they were crossing a red line.
 
Maybe you can tell me than what STS-28 has been doing in space
Nothing since August 13 1989 when it returned to earth; before that, it deployed two satellites for communications and surveillance.

Nothing unusual, sinister or alarming presaging the fall of man happened


Earth at same orbittal position as during the first return (STS-1) to Earth of space shuttle Columbia
So? Every time we mention position you say it does not matter.


I have already posted here in the HDDesign material that Columbia was taken out by Design.
One of many entirely baseless allegations.


I don't know what STS-28 was doing out there in space
Don't be so lazy, it was easy to find out.


but it seems they were crossing a red line.
More completely unsubstantiated nonsense and flapdoodle.
 
Paul, don't split these posts. I have asked you before so why are you still doing it? Make your point in a seperate post.

At Phi point between the first and the last ( desintegration) re-entry of spaceshuttle columbia, Columbia re-entered from a classified military mission

keep that in mind for around april 14
 
Last edited:
Paul, don't split these posts. I have asked you before so why are you still doing it?
Because the forum software is designed to enable messages to be addressed in discrete but thematically connected sections within one conveniently formatted post.


Make your point in a seperate post.
It is not considered appropriate to make large numbers of individual replies to minor points of one post.


At Phi point between the first and the last ( desintegration) re-entry of spaceshuttle columbia, Columbia re-entered from a classified military mission
So? Anyway, the mission wasn't classified, only the precise nature of the payload.


keep that in mind for around april 14
Why? Columbia doesn't exist anymore.



If you are having trouble using the quote function, try the help section at the right of the drop-down menus.
 
refreshing your memory,

On November 9, 2007 I wrote the following:

When I was monitoring the space events around November 7, which are mentioned on the timeline, I had this idea to check if the Space Shuttle disasters with the Challenger and the Columbia would indicate a Phi point for the monitored timeframe

It appeared that it wasn't the case, Space Shuttle Columbia desintegrated on February 1, 2003 during re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere. The Space Shuttle Challenger disintegrated 73 seconds into its flight on January 28, 1986.
If these two events are considered to be 2 Phi points a a Phi based time spiral, than the next date inwards would be the timeframe between these events devided by the Golden Mean Phi:

number of days between the events: 6213 ( rounded in full days)
6213 / 1.61803399 = 3840 days

3840 days after February 1, 2003 gives August 6, 2013

comment today:
Here's this 'Hirhoshima' orbittal position again, an August 6, the same position of this 'Hirhoshima crash'on August 6, 2005, which led to the discovery of the Tunguska-Hirhoshima/Nagasaki correlation as outlined in previous posts. April 14, 2009 is directly linked to this 'Hirhoshima crash' with the same orbittal position of Venus and marking the anniversarry of the first re-entry of space shuttle Columbia.

I continued back in November 2007:
Although this is an interesting date ( Hirhoshima anniversary, 'stay out of space and don't mess with nuclear power' / the 2 major underlying themes of our times) it is well in the future. Ofcourse this date will pop up on the future timelines but for the current timeframe I let it rest...until today.
Again I had to think about these two terrible disasters with the space shuttles and had this thought to look at the Phi point that hits the pattern spiralling outwards back in our perspective of time:
When I started to calculate the date I already had this feeling something profound would pop up. I could feel it in my stomage and hurried to see what the calculated date July 24, 1975 would give.
It was 'in the face'
On that day the last Apollo mission returned to Earth !
It was the time of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project:
"The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project was the first joint flight of the U.S. and Soviet space programs. The mission took place in July 1975. For the United States of America, it was the last Apollo flight, as well as the last manned space launch until the flight of the first Space Shuttle in April 1981.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo-Soyuz_Test_Project

comment today: so the disaster with the Challenger happened in fact at Phi point between this re-entry of the last manned Apollo and the re- entry of the Columbia, resulting in desintegration.

That means that both Challenger and Columbia were taken out by Design

On November 12, 2007 I wrote:
on the second hit further back in time on this Apollo - Space Shuttle Golden Mean Phi based timespiral:
January 19, 1965 - The unmanned Gemini 2 is launched on a suborbital test of various spacecraft systems.
Gemini 2 was the second spaceflight of the American human spaceflight program Project Gemini. Gemini 2, like Gemini 1, was an unmanned mission intended as a test flight of the Gemini spacecraft's heat shield. The flight was suborbital and was launched on a Titan II rocket. The mission's spacecraft later became the first to be flown into space twice when it was sent on an unmanned military mission.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_2
As this Golden Mean Phi based spiral goes inwards back in time, there's a timframe from where this spiral originates from in our perspective of time.
We go back to the timeframe around July 22 , 1958, based on the timeframe between the Space Shuttle disasters. Remember that the timeframe between the markers Challenger and Columbia was rounded to full days, the perfect Golden Mean spiral would put the start of the spiral a few days later than July 22, 1958
Explorer 4 was a US satellite launched on July 26, 1958. It was instrumented by Dr. James van Allen's group. The Department of Defense's Advanced Research Projects Agency had initially planned two satellites for the purposes of studying the Van Allen radiation belts and the effects of nuclear explosions upon these belts (and the Earth's magnetosphere in general), however Explorer IV was the only such satellite launched.
Explorer 4 was a cylindrically shaped satellite instrumented to make the first detailed measurements of charged particles (protons and electrons) trapped in the terrestrial radiation belts. An unexpected tumble motion of the satellite made the interpretation of the detector data very difficult. The low-power transmitter and the plastic scintillator detector failed September 3, 1958. The two Geiger-Mueller tubes and the caesium iodide crystal detectors continued to operate normally until September 19, 1958. The high-power transmitter ceased sending signals on October 5, 1958. It is believed that exhaustion of the power batteries caused these failures. The spacecraft decayed from orbit after 454 days on October 23, 1959.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explorer_IV
Operation Argus
Operation Argus was a series of nuclear weapons tests and missile tests secretly conducted during August and September of 1958, in the South Atlantic, by the Defense Nuclear Agency, in conjunction with the Explorer IV mission. Contractors from Lockheed Aircraft Corporation as well as a few personnel and contractors from the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission were on hand as well. The timeframe for Argus was substantially impacted due to the instability of the political environment (bans on atmospheric and exoatmospheric testing were forthcoming). Consequently, the tests were conducted within a mere half year of conception (whereas "normal" testing took one to two years).
The tests
About 1800 km southwest of Cape Town, South Africa, USS Norton Sound launched three modified X-17A missiles armed with 1.7 kt W-25 nuclear warheads into the upper atmosphere, where high altitude nuclear explosions took place. The (extreme) altitude of the tests was chosen so as to prevent personnel involved in the test from being exposed to any ionizing radiation [1].
Coordinated measurement programs involving satellite, rocket, aircraft, and surface stations were employed by the services as well as other government agencies and various contractors worldwide.
The tests were proposed by Nicholas Christofilos of what was then the Livermore branch of the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory (now Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) as a means to verify the Christofilos theory, which argued that high-altitude nuclear detonations would create a radiation belt in the extreme upper regions of the Earth's atmosphere. Such belts would be similar in effect to the Van Allen radiation belts. Such radiation belts were viewed as having possible tactical use in war. Prior to Argus, Hardtack Teak had shown disruption of radio communications from a nuclear blast. However, this was not due to the creation of radiation belts.
The Argus explosions created artificial electron belts resulting from the β-decay of fission fragments. These lasted for several weeks. Such radiation belts affect radio and radar transmissions, damage or destroy arming and fusing mechanisms of intercontinental ballistic missile warheads, and endanger crews of orbiting space vehicles.
Argus proved the validity of Christofilos theory: the establishment of an electron shell derived from neutron and β-decay of fission products and ionization of device materials in the upper atmosphere was demonstrated. It not only provided data on military considerations, but produced a "great mass" of geophysical data.
The tests were first reported by the New York Times on March 19, 1959, headlining it as the "greatest scientific experiment ever conducted." Approximately nine ships and 4,500 people participated in the operation. After the completion of testing, the task force departed for the United States via Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Followed the Hardtack I series, but preceded Hardtack II.
While the tests were announced the following year, the full results and documentation of the tests were not declassified until 30 April 1982.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Argus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom