Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
They don't have a 'shape', only interference points with orbittal positions .
If they don't have a shape they can't be Platonic solids can they?

Also, if they are formless, how can you know where your interference points will be?
 
I don't know why any of you guys post here, I really don't.
More than anything else, I don't want Dutch's posts to go unchallenged. It would not look good on a skeptics' board for something that is pretty much a case study in logical fallacies to be ignored. In that way it's a pretty good learning tool for me.

Also, despite his obsession with HDD, I find Dutch a pleasant person to discuss things with. While at times he gets frustrated with our continued skepticism over his system, rarely does he post anything that even causes me to wonder if I should hit the report button. I'm not sure he's ever had a post reported out of this thread. If so, I can't recall a single warning being posted.

It's also the only source I have for news on Dutch politics :D
 
Last edited:
If they don't have a shape they can't be Platonic solids can they?

Also, if they are formless, how can you know where your interference points will be?

But Paul, that has been explained here in this thread and on HDDsign forum.

In short to remind you: These HD Platonic solids originate from outside our 3D ( or 4 / time) reality. If you want to visualize: they look as if they are overrolled, crushed or flattened and placed upon an orbit, only to unveil their connectedness with our reality on the determined orbitalposition.

Although these HD Solids are connected to every single moment in our reality, there's what I call a macrolevel that unveils the orientation of these solids as based on the calendars we use.

This way the HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel for instance, gives predetermined spots on Earth's orbit corresponding with our systems of dates with September 11 ( 9/11 ) or March 11 ( Madrid train bombings)

The assassinations of Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh also unveil such a similar HD Tetrahedron, although not at the main macrolevel orientation, but the 'geometry' is still the same.
 
Once again, I don't claim to be able to prove HDDesign.

I am talking about the indications that seem to imply HDDesign indeed exists
Seems that Dutch doesn't know what proving is all about, for one.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
In short to remind you: These HD Platonic solids originate from outside our 3D ( or 4 / time) reality.
Then they're not platonic solids are they.


they look as if they are overrolled, crushed or flattened and placed upon an orbit
How do you know?

What orbit?

You claim they are in a dimension or dimensions that cannot be observed and then you claim to know what they 'look' like.


only to unveil their connectedness with our reality on the determined orbitalposition.
How are they connected?


Although these HD Solids are connected to every single moment in our reality
Then there's nothing special about specific dates.


there's what I call a macrolevel that unveils the orientation of these solids as based on the calendars we use.
Why?

What orientation?

Why are calendars interchangeable?


This way the HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel for instance, gives predetermined spots on Earth's orbit corresponding with our systems of dates with September 11 ( 9/11 ) or March 11 ( Madrid train bombings)
How does a squashed tetrahedron from another dimension, which has a spacial relationship with earth you refuse to explain, and which is permanently connected to us, give any specific information at all?


but the 'geometry' is still the same.
Are you still claiming that when you say geometry , you don't mean geometry as everyone else understands it?
 
Once again, I don't claim to be able to prove HDDesign.
So, why the hell is this thread in the "Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology".

I can think of a better one for it.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Once again, I don't claim to be able to prove HDDesign.

I am talking about the indications that seem to imply HDDesign indeed exists
Again, you don't know how to do science, and have not been shown doing any science. The indications you show are just news, this is not how science is done, this thread should be in "General Skepticism and The Paranormal" if anywhere, not here with science.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
back to the essence again

On February 10 I wrote:

side by side, today: JSF / F-16 - Mladic - Obama security issue - Geert Wilders. All 4 expressions of the identified underlying themes of these specific timecoded patterns as mentioned in this thread. Although seemingly unrelated, they are getting momentum at the same time again:

'Vervanging F-16 kan jaren later'
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3215671/___Vervanging_F-16_kan_jaren_later___.html?p=9,2

EUFOR searching Mladić family homes
http://www.b92.net/eng/news/crimes-article.php?yyyy=2009&mm=02&dd=10&nav_id=57045

Man arrested with rifle said he had delivery for Obama
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/10/obama.threat/index.html

Geert Wilders not welcome in GB
http://www.telegraaf.nl/buitenland/3220259/__Wilders_mag_Engeland_niet_in__.html?p=22,1

on February 12 I wrote in addition:

"Note that on February 10, 2009 Venus is on the same orbittal position as during the assassinantion of Pim Fortuyn:

May 6, 2002 - February 10, 2009 = 2.472 days

or 11 * 224.68 = 2.472 days rounded

Venus at same orbittal position"

So the Venus connection in relation to the assassination of Pim Fortuyn has been mentioned here, on February 12

That very same day I posted:

"Oh yes.......

and the first innerplanet has arrived at the same orbittal position as during the end of this 911 based Phi spiral:

November 14, 2008 - February 10, 2009 = 88 days

Mercury 'The Messenger' at same orbittal position again!"

The next logical steps in line of thought would be the orbital position of Venus, with 224.68 Earth days the next planet to take the same orbittal position again as during the end of this 911 based Phi spiral.

first mercury, second Venus and third Earth

2 days later the confirmation is already there. Although the orbittal position of Venus is not sooner than June 27, 2009, the underlying themes are already confirmed:

I wrote on Feb 14:

The next inner planet to arrive at the same postion again would be Venus, right?

One would expect related expressions on that day

We talk about June 27, 2009

and here it is already:

Announcement on HD Cube at macrolevel:

personal belongings Pim Fortuyn are to be sold on......June 27, 2009!

14 feb 2009

Persoonlijk bezit Fortuyn geveild

ROTTERDAM - De persoonlijke bezittingen van Pim Fortuyn komen onder de hamer. De spullen van de in 2002 vermoorde politicus worden op 27 juni geveild bij veilinghuis Hessink's in Nijmegen. Dat heeft Hans den Hartog, een van de twee eigenaren van het voormalige woonhuis van Fortuyn in Rotterdam, zaterdag gezegd.
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3257946/__Persoonlijk_bezit_Fortuyn_geveild__.html?p=14,1

These kind of synchronicities or coincidences happen all the time while dealing with this HDDesign

There are numerous examples of this posted in the HDDesign material, but one should do his or her's own research in order to comprehend

I think some readers aren't fully aware of this
 
Still no science, just a Horoscope, and a poor one at that. Number not a science make.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Another question for you.

Many people think that the scientific process involves figuring out what works. However, that is actually the goal, not the method. The method involves coming up with a hypothesis involving why somehting might work. A test is then devised so that if it fails, it definitively disproves the hypothesis and causes it to be rejected.

You've poured over six years into this and have accumulated a small mountain of notes. Can you devise a test or a series of tests that will, if they are positive, provide evidence for HDD, but if negative, disprove HDD?

I say "tests" because HDD, like astrology, biology, psychology, or anthropology, does not lend itself to well to the yes/no type of tests that physics and mathematics excel in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom