Hyper Dimensional Design

[Blue Mountain]

On the failure of Hyper Dimensional Design

Dutch, there is no way you'll ever convince me, Paul, or Paulhoff that there is anything to HDD other than the prognostications of a self-deluded crank.

HDD is nothing but numerology coupled with inventive ways to make the numbers fit the news, or cherry-picking the news to make the numbers fit, with a large doses of post hoc ergo propter hoc and confirmation bias thrown in.

HDD fails at explaining the universe and the events of our time every bit as badly as do fundamentalist religion, the pantheons of the ancient gods, Ptolemaic astronomy, astrology, numerology, UFOlogy, paranormalism, spiritualism, Lysenkoism, creationism, the ether, N-Rays, Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision, and the expanding earth theory.

It's doomed to join all the above in the rubbish tip of unscientific paradigms, along with perpetual motion machines and the Time Cube.

 

[Dutch]

I see, than I will convince you in my way...

 

[Paul]

not in a sense like 'godditit' so WE don't do it.

The underlying Design is Intelligent indeed, you are messing it up with the 'Intelligent Design' movement, which is something completely different and I don't want this to be seen part of that movement.

The you probably shoudn't have used the words 'intelligently designed, divine source, spiritual development, intelligent design and intelligent influences' in your post.

I have made clear numerous times that WE are responsible for what happens in our reality.

You can't have your cake and eat it; either we did it and everything else is numerological pareidolia, or the extra-dimensional supernatural entity did it and all your unsupported hand waving is a pointless exercise in random blame mongering.

We cannot be seen seperate from the 'source'.

You mean the source from another dimension that we have no direct connection with?

you may call that God, but we are part of it and we are responsible for what happens so don't put this responsibility in the hans of a God outside ourselves

It seems that you are having considerable difficulty in understanding your own words and in following the inevitable conclusions.

 

[Blue Mountain]

so you have prpared these and now you post them all at once? you are not going to claim my time like this. one by one please

Dutch, I posted a big long response to your 3,400 word dump in post #1286. You complained about that and asked me to break it up. So I did, and now you're complaining about that.

There's nothing that says you have to respond to all my posts at once. The forum will still be here next week. Take your time.

 

[Dutch]

There's nothing that says you have to respond to all my posts at once. The forum will still be here next week. Take your time.

That's fair enough. You may have noticed that I spend little time posting lately, at least not as much as during the last couple of years. I have another job and I am much more busier than in the past. Also, I barely spend time online at home, my family comes first. So if a specific respons needs time to explain you will have to wait until I have the time to do so.
You also have to keep in mind that I more or less had planned to take a break from the end of november last year until the second half of march ( because I expect this will be an important timeframe), but the 'deep impact' related developments draw me back into it.

 

[Dutch]

On patterns

The problem with all the stuff you've posted here is there does not appear to us that there is ANY underlying pattern. Recall that the human mind is really good at searching for and finding patterns. Even were no patterns exist. The technical term whn applied to people recognizing faces where none really exist is called 'pareidolia'.

Numerology, astrology, and most of paranormal and 'alternative medicine' research all fall victim to this all-too-common human frailty, unless the studies are meticulously well-designed to eliminate our tendency toward confirmation bias,

A question for you, Dutch: Do you know what confirmation bias is, and can you explain to us why you feel you are immune from it?

Yes I know what confirmationbias is. In the way I do my 'research' it is different because I have a focus on FUTURE developments on the patterns. When you expect a health issue for the Pope on a specific date based on a pattern and when that day comes he's taken to the hospital with health problems, not only once but several times, than it has nothing to do with looking for confirmation of preconceptions. There are numerous examples in the material, the reader should be well aware of the moment of posting of these correlations. Also, the patterns or indications of Intelligent Design do pop up after an intuitive thought or synchronicity, showing its correlation at hand instantly.
If you lack the experience of noticing all these 'coincidences', than you would indeed think its al unrelated. I have said from the beginning that you can dismiss everything as just a coincidense, from a stand alone point of view. I have seen so much 'confirmations' that I know it ca't just be coincidences.

 

[Dutch]

On numerology

Your fascination with 911 and 1111 is pure numerology. You had to add 1 to your 555+555 to get it to 1111, which you consider to be important. Why not subtract 1 and go with 1109 instead? Because it's not a cute number?

Yes, people do see "11:11" on their clocks. But they also see 8:26, 10:42, 3:19, and 5:47, but they usually don't remember those. Read up on confirmation bias to understand why that is.

Why are you not doing research on 42 (Douglas Adams' number for Life, the Universe, and Everything)? That sounds like a pretty important number.

There's also 337. It keeps popping up in my life, so it must be significant.

A constant and recurring problem with your HDD is that you sometimes have to stretch or squeeze your day counts to make them fit. But that's only a minor problem ...

As said before, 911 ( +/- 1 day as always) is the number of Earthdays that connect 2 dots of a Hyper Dimensional Tetrahedron linked to Earth's orbit.
Do a google search on 1111 or 11:11 and you will notice that alot of people have something with this. What's new in HDDesign that I look at this as a 1111 dyas timeframe on Earth, with the monitored events day in the middle of this timeframe. The start and end day of this timeframe are considered to be 'triggerdates' in the HDDesign 'research'.

I use a +/- 1 day timeframe, but that's probably way to rigid as explained before in this thread several times

edit: 1109 days on Earth don't connect the same orbital positions of Mars and Venus via Phi , 1111 does

 

[Dutch]

A major problem with this basic premise of HDD is there are lots of very significant events on this big old planet that do not occur exactly 911 days apart, and thus would fall outside the realm of HDD.

This 911 days timeframe is just 1 single element of HDDesign. 9/11 and the Madrid bombings happened to unveil this hidden underlying Design in our reality.

 

[Dutch]

Nonsense. I could write the same two paragraphs and using any 3- or 4-digit number. And if I chose to spend six years of my spare time on it, I could come up with any number of amazing correlations on that number.

A question for you, Dutch: Do you know what cherry-picking the data is, and can you explain to us why you feel you are immune from it?

Really? a Mars year in Earthdays multiplied with Phi gives the 1111 days timeframe, multiply again and you get the same orbital positions for Venus.

So find yourselves a digit number and have fun. Don't forget to check if your number seems to mean anything for our consciousness like 1111. a gogle search with your number will do

 

[Dutch]

Do you know what cherry-picking the data is, and can you explain to us why you feel you are immune from it?

because this is dealing with future events.

to look endlesly for correlations after a fact, just as long as it takes to find something that fits would be cherry picking. You disregard the timimg of the postings and the 'instant' correlations that pop up after the initial intuitive thought or synchronicity

 

[Dutch]

On energy and physics

I don't think you understand what energy is. There is no evidence for love being a form of energy. No more than qi. We can't put an instrument on it and measure it, nor can we derive equations for it and use them to predict what will happen with this energy for a given set of inputs.

You made reference to changing energies based on what you can glean from HDD. Just how do you propose to change this 'energy'? Prayer? Meditation? Yogic flying? Chanting mantras? Sacrificing chickens?

And how will determine if your efforts at change have been successful? And even if they are successful, how will you know that it's been the efforts of the people in the HDD community (however many or few they may be) that have caused the outcome?

You use the phrase "Hyper-dimensional physics" more than once in the treatise you post in #1286. I do not think you have any understanding of physics.

A question for you, Dutch: What's your definition of energy, and can you explain to us how that jibes with the scientific definition of energy?

Because it seems to me that especially these 'dark expressions' of consciousness are materializing on these patterns that according to the HDDesign research could be known. You should ask yourselves the question why that seem to be the case. Knowledge about these patterns will increase our understanding of our reality and why things are happenening and how we are responsible. I think increasing the knowledge of these concepts and being a lovebased peron are going hand in hand.

Personally, I think everything we think or do will make a difference.Even you thinking about it makes a difference. If it is successful remains to be seen, I don't think we can really know during opur lifetimes here.

I talk about applying Hyper Dimensional Physics. With that I mean applying the the geometrical correlations in our reality as described by HD physics.

I don't see what my understanding of physiscs has to do with it, as long as it isn't absolutely impossible what i'm saying, based on proved physics.

 

[Dutch]

What's your definition of energy

Well, I stick with the scientific explanation. I used it here as a metaphor in realtion to the intent we have by creating our reality, an interdimensional 'force'.

 

[Dutch]

What knowledge can the ancients give us that is applicable to today's world?

we can learn from the rise and especially the fall of ancient civilizations.

Also, if HDDesign is indeed valid we should look at the ancient myths from a completely different perspective

 

[Dutch]

On genocide

You can't commit genocide in the latter half of the twentieth century without having the world holding you to account for it, thanks to advances in international law. Prior to that, though, people could and did get away with it. The two most notable examples in the 20th century were the Armenian genocide by the Turks, and Stalin's mass murder to the Ukrainians by a program of induced famines.

A question for you, Dutch: Does HDD have an effect on genocides perpetrated only since the 1940s, even though both (genocide and, presumably, HDD) have been around for much longer than that?

Arkan and Milosevic didn't die because of international law, nor did Pim Fortuyn or Theo van Gogh or the Dutch peacekeeping soldiers that were killed by friendly fire. These genocides continue because we care less about our own responsibilities.
'Srebrenica' isn't done yet, we will still have to see the carmic expressions with those ( politically) responsible for the massacre.

 

[Dutch]

It's doomed to join all the above in the rubbish tip of unscientific paradigms

I don't think so, w'll see


Paul, I do not respond to posts that split-up my words, another reply on these splits will drag things out of context. Make your point in a seperate post please

 

[Paul]

Paul, I do not respond to posts that split-up my words, another reply on these splits will drag things out of context. Make your point in a seperate post please

OK, apologies to the others - both of you - but it won't do to have any excuses for not addressing the issues:

The underlying Design is Intelligent indeed, you are messing it up with the 'Intelligent Design' movement, which is something completely different and I don't want this to be seen part of that movement.

Then you probably shoudn't have used the words 'intelligently designed, divine source, spiritual development, intelligent design and intelligent influences' in your post.

 

[Paul]

I have made clear numerous times that WE are responsible for what happens in our reality.

You can't have your cake and eat it; either we did it and everything else is numerological pareidolia, or the extra-dimensional supernatural entity did it and all your unsupported hand waving is a pointless exercise in random blame mongering.

 

[Paul]

We cannot be seen seperate from the 'source'.

You mean the source from another dimension that we have no direct connection with?

 

[Paul]

you may call that God, but we are part of it and we are responsible for what happens so don't put this responsibility in the hans of a God outside ourselves

It seems that you are having considerable difficulty in understanding your own words and in following the inevitable conclusions.




There, is that better?

Are you going to respond properly now?

 

[Dutch]

You can't have your cake and eat it; either we did it and everything else is numerological pareidolia, or the extra-dimensional supernatural entity did it and all your unsupported hand waving is a pointless exercise in random blame mongering.

I thought you would understand by now that I think that WE are extra- or multiple supernatural entities. What we experience as 'self' in this 3D dimension is only a limited expression of our multidimensional potential.

To try to understand reality from this limited 3D perspective only is a death end.

so it is both