Hyper Dimensional Design

[Paulhoff]

I believe, too, that there is much interconnectedness in the Universe,....

Has in..........

Paul

 

[DuckTapeFileMan]

Has in..........

I'm not sure what this means, PH.

Could you elaborate?

 

[Paulhoff]

I'm not sure what this means, PH.

Could you elaborate?

You made the statement, how can I elaborate on it.

Paul

 

[DuckTapeFileMan]

You made the statement, how can I elaborate on it.

do you mean "as in?"


Are you asking what sort of interconnectedness? For examples?

 

[Paulhoff]

Originally Posted by DuckTapeFileMan
I believe, too, that there is much interconnectedness in the Universe,....

That is what you wrote....

Paul

 

[DuckTapeFileMan]

That is what you wrote....

well, I do believe it, but I can't prove it.

 

[The Man]

I have chosen May 30, 2008 as example date with a reason:

As you can see in the example above, may 30 2008 has a November 22 as starttriggerday, making the assassination of JFK a possible triggerevent.

Around May 30 Ted Kennedy announced that he needed brain surgery and last monday the surgery took place.

Mercury 'The Messnger'is confirming the correlation again in this described Design:

exactly 166 Mercury years in Earthdays sooner than May 30, 2008, with Mercury the Messenger at same geometrical position:

June 6, 1968 : Robert Kennedy was killed

14.603 days or 166 times 87.969 = 14.603 rounded

Dutch, (someone might have mentioned this before) it doesn’t seem that you have taken into account the precession (perihelion shift)of Mercury’s orbit or the relative positions of the Earth and Mercury in your calculations.


http://www.astro.uni.wroc.pl/vt-2004/mt-2003/mt-mercury-orbit.html

Mercury revolves around the Sun in an elliptical orbit at a mean distance of 58 million km; the orbital period is 88 Earth days or 0.24 Earth years. Its orbit is inclined about 7° to the plane of the Ecliptic which marks the annual path of the Sun among the stars as seen from the Earth. (The Ecliptic is the projection of the Earth's orbit onto the celestial sphere).
Mercury's orbit is very eccentric. When at "perihelion" (the orbital point where a planet is closest to the Sun), Mercury is about 46.0 million km from the Sun and at "aphelion" (the orbital point farthest from the Sun), it is at a distance of 69.8 million km. It is therefore about 1.5 times more distant in aphelion than at perihelion - this is also expressed by the orbital "eccentricity" which is rather large (0.2056). For comparison, the eccentricity of the Earth's much more circular orbit is only 0.0167.
Mercury, as the innermost planet, is also the fastest moving major planet in the solar system. The mean orbital velocity is about 48 km/s (the Earth moves at 30 km/s). Mercury's sidereal period is about 88 Earth days - this is the interval of time one body needs to complete one revolution around another body with reference to the stars. The synodic period of Mercury is about 116 Earth days - this is interval of time until Mercury again is in the same position relative to the Sun, as seen from the Earth (the difference is caused by the simultaneous motion of the Earth in its orbit). Both periods are the shortest of any major planet.

So, although it takes Mercury 88 Earth days to complete one orbit around the Sun it takes 116 days for Mercury to return to the same geometrical position in relation to the Sun as seen from the Earth. This would make the proper calculation for the Earth days until Mercury returns to that same geometrical position 166 times as 116 X 166 or 19,256 days.

ETA: The perihelion shift of Mercury’s orbit is 43 arc seconds per century or 17.2 arc seconds in a 14,603 day period and would be 22.7 arc seconds for a 19,256 day period.

 

[Dutch]

I talk about geometrical positions in relation to the orbit around the Sun, the hart of our Hyper Dimensional system ( as I see it). The shape of the orbit is irrelevant, aswell as the actual location in space. Its the relative position that counts, degrees translated into earth days

This is not about astrology, its about geometry

 

[Paulhoff]

I talk about geometrical positions in relation to the orbit around the Sun, the hart of our Hyper Dimensional system ( as I see it). The shape of the orbit is irrelevant, aswell as the actual location in space. Its the relative position that counts, degrees translated into earth days

This is not about astrology, its about geometry

What part of the orbit do you call the starting point in space and since the sun is moving in orbit around the Milky-Way galaxy and the Milky-Way galaxy is moving how do you know you have the right point in space to begin with? Also how do you give a value to these orbits, what reference do you use? Do you account for the speed of light and gravity? How about the mass of the black-hole in the middle of the Milky-Way galaxy, do you know the numbers for that. And the Oort cloud, do you use numbers for the Oort cloud?

Paul

 

[Blue Mountain]

What part of the orbit do you call the starting point in space and since the sun is moving in orbit around the Milky-Way galaxy and the Milky-Way galaxy is moving how do you know you have the right point in space to begin with? Also how do you give a value to these orbits, what reference do you use? Do you account for the speed of light and gravity? How about the mass of the black-hole in the middle of the Milky-Way galaxy, do you know the numbers for that. And the Oort cloud, do you use numbers for the Oort cloud?

And the asteroids? Won't somebody think of the asteroids?

 

[Dutch]

I wrote:

This weekend's Venus Transit midpoint is also a 'Kennedy timeframe' with Mercury 'The Messnger' marking Joseph jr's death.

and a 'Kennedy timeframe' it is: in the face:
New RFK funeral train photos
A funeral train brought Robert F. Kennedy's body to Washington. Unseen photos of the journey were recently discovered.
watch the video here:
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2008/06/06/rfk.something.happening.here.cnn

 

[Paul]

Is that the best justification you can find?

My idea must be right because some old photographs were in the news.


By the way, the book was originally published around 1999, so the only thing new here is the addition of a few more photographs.

 

[Paulhoff]

Is that the best justification you can find?

My idea must be right because some old photographs were in the news.


By the way, the book was originally published around 1999, so the only thing new here is the addition of a few more photographs.

But but but, they are new photographs, the planets are moving for something other then their path around the Sun, geeeee.

Paul



And what about that teacup orbiting between the Sun and Mercury.

 

[Dutch]

I would keep an eye on the timeline instead

 

[Paul]

But you don't appear to have anything better to do, certainly not responding the actual points raised.

 

[The Man]

I talk about geometrical positions in relation to the orbit around the Sun, the hart of our Hyper Dimensional system ( as I see it). The shape of the orbit is irrelevant, aswell as the actual location in space. Its the relative position that counts, degrees translated into earth days

This is not about astrology, its about geometry

But it is the shape of the orbit that determines how many degrees of its orbit Mercury will transverse in any give span of Earth days. Mercury has a mean orbital velocity of 48 km / sec, which means its average orbital velocity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keplers_law

A line joining a planet and the sun sweeps out equal areas during equal intervals of time as the planet travels along its orbit. This means that the planet travels faster while close to the sun and slows down when it is farther from the sun. With his law, Kepler rejected the Aristotelean astronomical theory that planets have uniform velocity.

So, the more elliptical the orbit the greater the variation in orbital velocity during that orbit or the greater the variation in the orbital degrees a body (like Mercury) will transverse in a given span of earth days, or hours, or minutes. Unless of course you claim the precise timing of events and “triggers” are always exact whole orbits apart, which would require precise times of the events and "triggers" as well a specific knowledge of the position of mercury in its orbit at both the event and the “trigger” since any difference in the exact timing can have varying implications as to the number of degrees traversed my Mercury during that period depending on where it is in its orbit.

 

[Paulhoff]

SPOCK to Captain Kirk

He's intelligent, but not experienced.

His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking...

Paul



The intelligent part is up for grabs here.

 

[Dutch]

The Man,

The 3D shape is irrelevant, aswell as the positions in relation to the background in space. Its the Geometry that counts , regardless the shape of an orbit.
We have gone through this BAUT forum, until the forum rules were changed giving you 30 days to 'prove' the theory.

Yes how smart indeed

I think you better read the threads at baut first

 

[Paul]

Or, you could just explain what you mean by geometry, as it's obviously not what we understand by the term.

 

[Paulhoff]

Its the Geometry that counts , regardless the shape of an orbit.

There is no Geometry that does depend on shape, none none and none.

Geometry (Greek γεωμετρία; geo = earth, metria = measure) is a part of mathematics concerned with questions of size, shape, and relative position of figures and with properties of space.

Find a new word to use.

Paul