Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't insult me.

Your gibberish isn't "beyond me", it's simply complete nonsense.
Patronising people because you believe in rubbish is your problem not mine.

I'm not insulting you, apparently it is just beyond you.

With calling it complete nonsense you are an insult to your own essence
 
Rafik Hariri is unknown to pretty much 99% of the world. He was just another in a long line of murdered middle eastern politicians. Use your math to connect a couple of dozen out of the thousands of assassinated politicians, kings, caliphs, imams, rabbis, and regular men. Just intuiting is BS. You have nothing and cannot show or prove anything.

The difference with this one is that it has been put to the international court in The Hague. Have you read the dedicated thread in the HDDesign material?

You can learn about the real background and resposibilities if you read well.

walking on eggs here ( me )
 
So once again we see that you have provided no way for your Dimensional Design Hype to ever be wrong. So you don’t in fact assert what you do (as you tried to pretend up thread) to be impossible or even just improbable, you are explicitly claiming it to be inevitable. Personally I think that is more important to unveil, that you will find something to cram into your “underlying themes” no matter how long it takes or what you have to pretend. Once again you have a chance to evolve here but if you don’t take it, it is just you.

Say Dutch what date was that "decission to drop the atomic bomp on Hirhoshima, at Phi point between Deep Impact and Tunguska." made?

I have mentioned it several times here and in the material. A date in July 1945, no time to look it up for you. Do that yourselves.

It is the anticipation on future moments in our perception of time man, that makes the difference. Over and over again
 
Do I really need to point out agian that "calculate it for you" is explicitly what you were asked to do? So, yep spam, as you now admit you were't even trying to do what was asked.

You know how the Golden Mean is applied. There are numerous examples in this thread. Don't act as a child that needs the 1+1=2 reconfirmed
 
Nope most here understand exactly what is happening. Your own posts indicate that you do to some extent or another as well but have a serious (and expected) disconnect to that understanding.

“ongoing 'seven days of creation'” you say, and just whom is doing the creating in such an obviously ongoing fashion?

You know whay I mean man because I have explained before here: there's no mind great enough to understand all underlying patterns that create our reality every single moment in our perception of time.

I'm not talking about an outside 'God' or so. We are facing the results of our own state of consciousness. At micro level in personal lives and at macro level based on our collective consciousness. The latter is about the destiny of mankind
 
Can't bite my tongue any longer.
This is a hilarious thread. Delusional nonsense that makes me chortle.

Breaking News.: "Hyper Dimensional Design" is as believable as "Magic Underpants Fabricated By An Octopus Called Fred"

Bridge. Creature.

your tongue is irrelevant, your consciousness counts
 
Yep, this thread is 7 years old today.



Dutch STILL hasn't shown us his methods.

We've waited 7 years and no scientific proof of HDD has been given.

He has shown us again and again "It's easy to find correlations after a fact by using numerology", despite saying he wasn't going to do that.

He wanted us to put aside our "rational ego", whatever that is. But clearly, he's closed-minded to rational questions about his hypothesis.

Dutch has now been doing "HDD" himself for 10 years. What a waste.

He's only got 2 people on his forum who believe him, and even they don't understand him. Two lost souls with their own delusions.

Nobody here believes Dutch.

And yet the thread continues. Why? Well, Dutch is so wrong in so many ways, that his posts inspire an equal number of replies pointing out his mistakes, if not more. It's easy to be wrong. It takes intelligence and patience to explain clearly why something is wrong, and it gives the brain a good workout to read the explanations. THAT's why I'm still here.

Thanks to all the readers and posters for your enlightening, intelligent and usually hilarious posts! :th:

Happy Anniversary, thread!

So you better start for once to explain to me specifically and intelligently why HDDesign is wrong. No general out of context remarks. Make your point in specific post and you better make sure they are good.

In all your posts related to HDDesign you've only be trying to debunk it in general terms. You are a coward and I challenge you. Note that you have to do your research too, if you think you really have to say something clever about HDDesign
 
... if you think you really have to say something clever about HDDesign

HDDesign HDDelusion is invalid, as demonstated by your good self.

You may decide whether that statement is clever or not although your opinion in that is irrelevant, you however have already demonstrated that the above statement is valid .....
 
Blah Blah Blah.

At least E=MC² has values for each of the letters.


Paul


:D :D :D

Albert Einstein had his thoughts about manifestation of consciousness aswell.

He was smart enough to understand that it would be a bridge too far at that time....and unfortunately it seems it still is
 
A Happy Birthday to the thread!


I'm new to the thread and wanted to know if someone could give a definition of "the described elements of HDDesign".
I've had my share of synchronicity in life and I'd like to know how any design can incorporate this as an element.

Start reading the HDDesign material I would say. Take your time, keep an eye on the current timelines and dig into the material posted in the supportive threads.
 
That's a shame, but as I read further into the thread I may get an idea of it.

I'd be interested in knowing how I can tell which synchronicities are significant enough to form part of the HDD.

They are all indications of underlying Design. I think you already know this, otherwise you would call it 'coincidences'
 
Start reading the HDDesign material I would say. Take your time, keep an eye on the current timelines and dig into the material posted in the supportive threads.

..... and see a display of truly obnoxious irrationality.
Yep, take your time and soak up the dirt.
 
Thanks, Paul.
Methodology is SO important.

Anyway, I'm already on page 2.


How did you come to the conclusion the platonic solids originated in another dimension?

Not in a sense of originating. It's the mathematical principal on which inter-dimensional connectedness becomes apparent, firmly marked by major events manifesting in our 3 D reality
 
That's a shame, but as I read further into the thread I may get an idea of it.

I'd be interested in knowing how I can tell which synchronicities are significant enough to form part of the HDD.
They are all indications of underlying Design. I think you already know this, otherwise you would call it 'coincidences'

For the irrational mind, everything fits once mangled by irrationality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom