Hyper Dimensional Design

[The Man]

Up to page11 and I found references to, of all things, the end of th Mayan Calendar!

I want to explain a bit more about this August 6 reference

as described in above posts, these sumatraquakes could be seen as a Phi point, unveiling the correlations between the quakes, Venus Transits and the end of the Mayan Calendar. ... for me, the geometrical position of Earth on the Phi spiral was an instant confirmation of Nagasaki being a Phi point in relation to the end of the Mayan calendar. When I saw August 6 popping up, I knew that Hirhoshima confirmed the underlying Design.

I think you have to let go a bit, your linear perception of time. The Geometry that is used in this HDDesign is indeed Platonic Solid based and Phi Golden Mean based etc., but the origine of the geometry comes from outside our familiar 3D (or 4 as time if you like). Think about Michio Kaku's carp, we can't visualize the shape of these other dimensions but their presence can be unveiled by applying the Hyper Dimensional Geometry as I call it.

Our solar system is a 3D counterpart of an intelligent, multi-dimensional reality.
The intelligent correlations come through at specific geometrical positions of the orbitting elements of our solarsystem.
The Platonic solids don't have shape in our reality, you must not look at them as if they are 3D placed around the sun or something like that. If you try to visualize, you have to look at them as rolled-over, flathened and pushed or crushed into the orbits of the planets. Only the geometrical correleations remain and unveil the hidden underlying Design. This way 9/11 was determined to be the Hyper Dimensional Tetrahedron key intersection area at 19.471, corresponding with our system of dates as September 11. It was the start of this 'research' about Hyper Dimensional Design

The Golden Mean spirals also pinpoint at geomatrical positions on the orbits, rather than a linear spiral in our perception of time. Take a look at this example:

The 1111 days timeframe which I have called the "awakenings timeframe' with the triggerdates at the start and end day of the timeframe is golden mean based connected with other orbits of planets: 1111 Phi based inspiralling gives 1 Mars year in earth days, 1111 Phi based outspiralling gives 8 Venus years in Earth days. Each Earth, Venus or Mars year they take the same position, the triggers themes could come through ( this triggerdate system should be explained in more detail I guesss in a seperate post). So geometrically spoken it doesn't matter if Hirhoshima happened in 1836 or 1945: the fact that hirhoshima happened on an august 6 confirms the Phispiral from end of Mayan Calendar with Nagasaki as Phi point

I will talk about how to look at this geometrical correlations much more, also in the context of current and future developments

Perhaps as I continue reading I'll get an idea how the end of the Mayan calendar has any sort of relevance to the Platonic solids.

Not likely. This is typical Dutch self-contradiction and just using words for which he never uses the concepts they represent that we have all seen here in spades. Well, those would be spades that “don't have shape in our reality”. Unfortunately, for Dutch, the first opposition to Dutch’s assertions comes entirely from Dutch’s own assertions. For example claiming he “can't visualize the shape of these other dimensions” yet referring to at least one as a “Hyper Dimensional Tetrahedron” and he even pretends that they give “specific geometrical positions of the orbitting elements of our solarsystem” while claiming his “Platonic solids” “don't have shape in our reality”. Even if Dutch could calculate how his “Platonic solids“ are “rolled-over, flathened and pushed or crushed into the orbits of the planets”, which he can’t because he claims “we can't visualize the shape of these other dimensions”, it wouldn’t matter as that would give his “Platonic solids”, well, “shape in our reality”. Which he claims they don’t have yet pretends that result in his “specific geometrical positions of the orbitting elements of our solarsystem”. It is always very telling when ones insightful assertions just don’t agree with themselves and when one professes to use what they explicitly claim they don’t have then all they are telling is that they explicitly can’t agree with themselves. The most telling part is that evidently Dutch just doesn’t know enough about geometry to even understand that “specific geometrical positions of the orbitting elements of our solarsystem” would be a “shape in our reality” yet pretends that he not only uses such geometry but even what he calls “Hyper Dimensional Geometry” while only working with one dimension (time).

Dutch, how can you expect anyone to agree with you when you explicitly can’t agree with yourself?

 

[Reality Check]

So you better start for once to explain to me specifically and intelligently why HDDesign is wrong. ...

The explanation is really easy, Dutch: HDDesign is wrong because it is a (7 year old in this thread) fantasy that only exists in your head !
Otherwise you could answer:

Oh dear, Dutch - way to confirm that these coincidences with the so far imaginary HDDesign are a product of your imagination !

In real science, an uncertainly in a quantity comes first from the mathematical treatment of a situation and then the match with data. Credible people do not say an event will happen on a future day X +/- 2 days (which is a prediction, Dutch) and when it does not happen expand the uncertainty until they find an event that matches (which is lying about a prediction, Dutch).

P.S. Once again - try to tell us how it works as I have asked before on 29th October 2013.
Let us see: thread started on 24th February 2007 and no explanation since then. That is 7 years or 2557 days!

HDDesign is wrong because you prove it wrong by changing it's "predictions" as above.

HDDesign is wrong because it has no predictions .

HDDesign is wrong because it is your personal cherry picking of news stories that matter to you on dates that only matter to you.

HDDesign is wrong because you contradict yourself with all of your assertions about it (see The Man's post above).

 

[dafydd]

We have never had an explanation of the mechanism by which these four dimensional objects actually cause events on Earth.

 

[Orphia Nay]

So you better start for once to explain to me specifically and intelligently why HDDesign is wrong. No general out of context remarks. Make your point in specific post and you better make sure they are good.

In all your posts related to HDDesign you've only be trying to debunk it in general terms. You are a coward and I challenge you. Note that you have to do your research too, if you think you really have to say something clever about HDDesign

I've posted in this thread 225 times. Others more scientifically-minded have posted a total of over 4,000 times.

It's quite clear you ignore any and every sort of post that has anything negative to say about HDDelusion.

You can't bully me into wasting more time and effort trying to get you to see reason.

I will comment how and when I feel like it.

 

[Dutch]

No, the evidence clearly shows it's based on irrational thought and a combination of misperception and misunderstanding of things in the real world.

The intelligent underlying correlations are based on our perception of time, wether you are capable to understand that or not. It doesn't depend on how it actually looks like, it depends on the intelligent correlations based on time itself.

You should understand that, you've been here all along and aparently wasted your time. You are not at the required level of thought, although it shouldn't be that difficult if you really try to understand what I mean

 

[Dutch]

Whatever failure you think you perceive, your irrational idea can not remedy it .....

I see that you don't understand that you've failed

 

[Dutch]

You mean, when you look at 'them' with a mind clouded by irrationality.

There's no doubt about the intelligent correlations that are given, based on our perception of time. If you don't want to see that, that's oke and your choice. But the correlations are there unmistakenly and you can't dismiss them unless you that despite better knowing. The only thing you can have an opinion about, is the math on which it is based. On that, there's no doubt about, so actually you are basing your comments on your lack of understanding which makes you in turn an irrelevant contributor to these issues.

 

[Dutch]

You mean, when you look at 'them' with a mind clouded by irrationality.

What I mean is that you might be focussed on the same spot as an appearance to how it actually shows to you. For example a planet at the same position towards the background of stars. That would be astrology and that is something completely different tan HDDesign. I talk about orbital positions of memebers in our solar system based on our perception of time, regardless how it looks like if you whatch it with a telescope. Including and especially our own planet Earth. These underlying intelligent correlations only show their face when you look at them based on our perception of time

 

[Dutch]

I question your definitions and understanding of the terms position, correlations, intelligent, perception, and time.

So please show me why you think so

 

[Dutch]

There are over 7 billion people alive today. Billions have died since time began or we would be a bit overcrowded.
How has Lebanon changed since Harari assumed roomground temperature? He is as insignificant as you or I.

Run your timelines backwards and connect his death to other politicians. Hell, even you should be able to do that. Don't forget to show your math!

The difference is , that this assassination is is being played out at macro level ( STL ) I don't think that it would happen with you or me or anybody insignificant else

 

[Dutch]

Yet, despite your claims that things aren't based on actual positions, pages and pages of this thread are dedicated to the time lapse between events here on Earth and the number of Earth days since another planet (or even one of its satellites) was in a certain position. I've got news for you: our calendar us based on the Earth's orbit around the sun. Ergo, using Earth days when computing the time between events means the Earth has moved on its orbit a certain amount, as have all the other planets.

HDD is merely numerology jumbled up with astrology and thrown into blender, and has as much predictive power as the blender.

So you do seem to understand a bit about our perception of time. You do agree I hope, that it doesn't matter how it looks like in space qua actual positions in relation to the background, but that I talk about intelligent correlations based on our perceptuion of time only

 

[Dutch]

Ah Dutch is still attempting to convince people he has special powers of perception and a lot of smart people are telling him he doesn't......7+ years and counting

Hans thinks he can just jump in to make pointless remarks.

If you are a big boy, you come up with something useful, you don't want to be a coward, do you?

 

[Dutch]

I've gotten to page 7 and found this:


I'm looking forward to reading how Dutch explains how the universe is keyed to the Western calendar, rather than the Chinese, for example.

You have to look backward if you want to know. This issue has already been adressed in this thread. I'm looking forward to talk to people who do try to understnd what this is about and at least give notice that they hev read it.

 

[Dutch]

To give you a hint: I think that the intelligent correlations between the orbital periods of planets based on our perception of time are the same here as they are in China...or on Mars for that matter.

 

[Hans]

.......so Dutch everyone is blind but you huh? Lol

 

[Reality Check]

What does "macro level ( STL )" mean, Dutch

The difference is , that this assassination is is being played out at macro level ( STL ) ...

Yet another undefined term, Dutch !

What does "macro level ( STL )" mean, Dutch, and how can anyone in the world tell the difference between any other "level"?
First asked 11 March 2014.

The implication is that this is your own personal, subjective opinion about whose lives are important .
Or the even dumber proposition that the universe thinks that some news stories are important and arranges the orbits of planets to match them !

P.S.
Once again - try to tell us how it works as I have asked before on 29th October 2013.
Let us see: thread started on 24th February 2007 and no explanation since then. That is over 7 years or 2557 days!

 

[Dutch]

Not likely. This is typical Dutch self-contradiction and just using words for which he never uses the concepts they represent that we have all seen here in spades. Well, those would be spades that “don't have shape in our reality”. Unfortunately, for Dutch, the first opposition to Dutch’s assertions comes entirely from Dutch’s own assertions. For example claiming he “can't visualize the shape of these other dimensions” yet referring to at least one as a “Hyper Dimensional Tetrahedron” and he even pretends that they give “specific geometrical positions of the orbitting elements of our solarsystem” while claiming his “Platonic solids” “don't have shape in our reality”. Even if Dutch could calculate how his “Platonic solids“ are “rolled-over, flathened and pushed or crushed into the orbits of the planets”, which he can’t because he claims “we can't visualize the shape of these other dimensions”, it wouldn’t matter as that would give his “Platonic solids”, well, “shape in our reality”. Which he claims they don’t have yet pretends that result in his “specific geometrical positions of the orbitting elements of our solarsystem”. It is always very telling when ones insightful assertions just don’t agree with themselves and when one professes to use what they explicitly claim they don’t have then all they are telling is that they explicitly can’t agree with themselves. The most telling part is that evidently Dutch just doesn’t know enough about geometry to even understand that “specific geometrical positions of the orbitting elements of our solarsystem” would be a “shape in our reality” yet pretends that he not only uses such geometry but even what he calls “Hyper Dimensional Geometry” while only working with one dimension (time).

Dutch, how can you expect anyone to agree with you when you explicitly can’t agree with yourself?

Be specific man ( and than they accuse me of 'word salad'). So tell me, why can't I agree with myself? No copy and paste, in your own words please or I will ignore it

 

[Dutch]

We have never had an explanation of the mechanism by which these four dimensional objects actually cause events on Earth.

Which objects are you talking about? I never talked about causing events on Earth, how can you be so ignorant after all these years? Under which stone have you been hiding or are you just paying games?

 

[Dutch]

I've posted in this thread 225 times. Others more scientifically-minded have posted a total of over 4,000 times.

It's quite clear you ignore any and every sort of post that has anything negative to say about HDDelusion.

You can't bully me into wasting more time and effort trying to get you to see reason.

I will comment how and when I feel like it.

So you give credence to number os posts only. I , for one, am looking at content.

Look at your own number of posts......and I have yet to see your first clever and constructive remark. Funny girl.

I agree with you that alot of posts in this thread were useless, and most of mine were not. ( this one is for that sake )

 

[Dutch]

.......so Dutch everyone is blind but you huh? Lol

I have yet to see the first convincive agruments against this HDDesign concept though. Your remarks are quite meaningless in that respect, if not totally irrelevant. You can have your LOL if you prefer self-irony