Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
First of all it is impossible to understand all that is happening, let alone what already has happened or will happen in the furure. I do think however, that there are major themes playing out through the times as reflection of our state of collective consciousness.

Nope most here understand exactly what is happening. Your own posts indicate that you do to some extent or another as well but have a serious (and expected) disconnect to that understanding.

The +/- 2 days is too rigid. Personally I have noticed repeatedly and consistently that 'out of the blue insights or synchronicities' start 3 days in advance of a major development and that's why I talk about pre=determined 'peak' dates with a few days before and beyond.

That you have to open up your window to cram your “repeatedly and consistently that 'out of the blue insights or synchronicities'” through should be telling you that something is demonstrably wrong with, at the very least, your “pre=determined” ascription. Certainly they ain’t predetermined to the dates you, well, determined.

That means that I talk about a timeframe or window around a pre-determined date. ( Although I'm not a religious guy, at least not in that sense, it would be an ongoing 'seven days of creation' for that matter. For every single moment in our perception of time here in our dimension)

“ongoing 'seven days of creation'” you say, and just whom is doing the creating in such an obviously ongoing fashion?
 
The +/- 2 days is too rigid. Personally I have noticed repeatedly and consistently that 'out of the blue insights or synchronicities' start 3 days in advance of a major development and that's why I talk about pre=determined 'peak' dates with a few days before and beyond.
Oh dear, Dutch - way to confirm that these coincidences with the so far imaginary HDDesign are a product of your imagination :eek:!

In real science, an uncertainly in a quantity comes first from the mathematical treatment of a situation and then the match with data. Credible people do not say an event will happen on a future day X +/- 2 days (which is a prediction, Dutch) and when it does not happen expand the uncertainty until they find an event that matches (which is lying about a prediction, Dutch).

P.S. Once again - try to tell us how it works as I have asked before on 29th October 2013.
Let us see: thread started on 24th February 2007 and no explanation since then. That is 7 years or 2557 days!
 
Can't bite my tongue any longer.
This is a hilarious thread. Delusional nonsense that makes me chortle.

Breaking News.: "Hyper Dimensional Design" is as believable as "Magic Underpants Fabricated By An Octopus Called Fred"

Bridge. Creature.
 
Yep, this thread is 7 years old today.

This thread is dedicated to the search for indications of hidden underlying multidimensional design just underneath the surface of our familiar 3-dimensional reality.

During the last couple of years I have developed methods of research in order to try to identfy these indications. Because it's always easy to elaborate on correlations after the fact, I wil focus on anticipations prior to the monitored events days in order to give a deeper meaning to the described Design.

The methods are based on Hyper Dimensional Physics elements, mathematics, intuitive knowledge, synchronities etc.

The thing is, that the triggerpatterns I use are indeed based on math, but the events on the triggerpatterns that I mention are always posted PRIOR to the monitored anticipated events date. It's easy to find correlations after a fact by using numerology, the issue here is : are we able to determine underlying patterns with related events, so we can anticipate on future events in order to lessen the impact of undesired effects in our reality. so we can learn on a more subtle level, instead of just another 9/11 related event to happen in order to wake us up.

Don't forget the intuition too. I have experienced almost daily that while working with this kind of info, an initial thought or coincidence shows me the way to new related information.

I have had so much 'in the face' moments during the last 3 years that I know that these patterns are there. But it's a journey, I can't convince anyone. I can only promise one thing: If someone decides to investigate this seriously and really starts to put aside the rational ego and keeps an open mind, than synchronity will become apparent and coincidences start to become meaningfull. Don't expect scientific proof, we don't have the time to wait for that

Now this is not about predicting future events.
It isn't about stopping patterns , it isn't about just trying to alter them. It's about changing the 'energy' involved.

Kind a 'Heisenberg princible' at macro level, with positive energy (love) as driving force.

If enough people are aware, the effects could be lessened, so we can learn on a more subtle level.

The greater the awareness, the more subtle reality becomes.

I don’t want to avoid things to happen, I just want to understand the reality we live in.
I have had a hard time too, accepting the possibility that our reality could be based on ‘designed patterns ‘bleeding’ through from other dimensional realms.
I’m not just playing with numbers, I’m a trying to apply Hyper Dimensional Physics in our understanding of our 3 dimensional reality. How HD Physics could become visible in our reality, not only visibly as Earthchanges on Hyperdimensional spots and throughout the solar system, but also in our perceptive of time. The Golden Mean time spirals are there to give essential meaning to at first sight unrelated events in our reality. It’s very ancient knowledge too, just waiting out there to be rediscovered.

I will post a timeline 2007 with anticipated keydates for the first few months once I'm able to post the urls

Dutch STILL hasn't shown us his methods.

We've waited 7 years and no scientific proof of HDD has been given.

He has shown us again and again "It's easy to find correlations after a fact by using numerology", despite saying he wasn't going to do that.

He wanted us to put aside our "rational ego", whatever that is. But clearly, he's closed-minded to rational questions about his hypothesis.

Dutch has now been doing "HDD" himself for 10 years. What a waste.

He's only got 2 people on his forum who believe him, and even they don't understand him. Two lost souls with their own delusions.

Nobody here believes Dutch.

And yet the thread continues. Why? Well, Dutch is so wrong in so many ways, that his posts inspire an equal number of replies pointing out his mistakes, if not more. It's easy to be wrong. It takes intelligence and patience to explain clearly why something is wrong, and it gives the brain a good workout to read the explanations. THAT's why I'm still here.

Thanks to all the readers and posters for your enlightening, intelligent and usually hilarious posts! :th:

Happy Anniversary, thread!
 
The formula is simple:

Intuitive thought or Synchronicity + application of the described elements of HDDesign = instant confirmation of underlying theme c.q. timing.

have fun

Blah Blah Blah.

At least E=MC² has values for each of the letters.


Paul


:D :D :D
 
Hahaha, Paul! :D

I'm sure there's some lumps to turn to pulp left in this carcass.

At the very least, Dutch keeps making pulp castles for us to re-squish every week or so.
 
A Happy Birthday to the thread!
The formula is simple:

Intuitive thought or Synchronicity + application of the described elements of HDDesign = instant confirmation of underlying theme c.q. timing.

have fun

I'm new to the thread and wanted to know if someone could give a definition of "the described elements of HDDesign".
I've had my share of synchronicity in life and I'd like to know how any design can incorporate this as an element.
 
At the very least, Dutch keeps making pulp castles for us to re-squish every week or so.
Well, it's not like he's actually answered the questions from page one yet, so we won't run out of targets for the whacky stick anytime soon.
 
I'm new to the thread and wanted to know if someone could give a definition of "the described elements of HDDesign".
According to our fearless pioneer of 3 dimensional hyperdimensions the described elements of HDDesign are the described elements of HDDesign.
 
That's a shame, but as I read further into the thread I may get an idea of it.

I'd be interested in knowing how I can tell which synchronicities are significant enough to form part of the HDD.
 
I'd be interested in knowing how I can tell which synchronicities are significant enough to form part of the HDD.
That's the easy part: have a synchronicity; read the intertubes until you find something newsy that vaguely fits; do some described elements of HDDesign; tell everyone it's obvious.
 
Thanks, Paul.
Methodology is SO important.

Anyway, I'm already on page 2.
The platonic solids originate from another dimension and onlt geometry unveils their existence, marked by high imopact event in our reality. The shape of the orbit isn't important because the solids don't have a 3D shape. The geometrical intersection area's on a 360 degrees orbit do correspond with our system of dates. ...

How did you come to the conclusion the platonic solids originated in another dimension?
 
Mumble mumble...point...line...triangle...square....cube...tesseract...HDD!!!!11!!11!
 
Thanks, Paul.
Methodology is SO important.

Anyway, I'm already on page 2.


How did you come to the conclusion the platonic solids originated in another dimension?

He didn’t, it is just an a priori assumption I expect Dutch got by reading some ‘hyper-dimensional’ author he has referred to previously. Not to worry, the fact that it isn’t actually a conclusion goes hand in hand with the fact that Dutch doesn’t in fact actually use geometry or any dimensions other than just one (time) in his Dimensional Design Hype.
 
I've gotten to page 4 and this post caught my eye.

And I don't.1 That's the problem with imprecise words like "Important".

So, we need some more rigid definition of "important" to apply to events to see if they fit the pattern. "Important" is too fluid in meaning, too impossible to reliably assign to real events. Two different observers could come to two different conclusions of whether or not an event is "important". I listed a number events in a prior post. Many of those could fit the definition of "important" found in the dictionary, depending on the person making the decision.

We need a criteria for "important" that any observer could apply, and come up with the same answer: "Important" or "Not Important".

What criteria are you applying?

--GodMark2

1Specifically, I don't consider 9/11 to be as important as the events leading up to it. That, however, is a topic that would deserve it's own thread.

I have the impression this question and variants upon it feature big-time in this thread.
 
I've gotten to page 4 and this post caught my eye.



I have the impression this question and variants upon it feature big-time in this thread.
The Harari assassination sticks out for me. While tragic, it's importance is debatable. One death out of millions. It is almost as if Dutch reads the news every few weeks and cherry picks what he deems as significant. Nah...that can't be.
 
I've gotten to page 4 and this post caught my eye.

I have the impression this question and variants upon it feature big-time in this thread.

Indeed. Dutch's cherry-picking and post hoc rationalizations are a core feature of HDD.

For a while he was also big on how various things happened when the Earth came around to the same place on its orbit as it had the last time, despite the fact all the other planets were in totally different positions by then. Attempts to get him to understand how planetary orbits work we unsuccessful.
 
I suggest that the acronym "HDD" stop being used.
It's giving credence to a pile of codswallop.

Let's hear a PREdiction and how it was formulated.

7 years of delusional childlike drawings means nothing in the real world

FTR; I doodled some red and blue triangles today.
Guess what? Europe will have a massive war starting in 1939.

Medication can help.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom