Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

Nope, as i have explained in a previous post above, both Yellowstone and 'the First Fase of Yellowstone' finds their same source of a stationairy plume around 45 degrees North.

I don't know what that means due to the arrangement of words not making any sense, but you do realise how big Yellowstone National Park is, don't you?

Due to continental drift of the North American plate, they both drifted over the same stationairy plume yes. That's fact, not a claim

So? Are you going to claim that large areas of Oregon, Nevada and Idaho are special too? Do your timelines go back 16 million years?

? The only thing I have claimed in the HDDesign material is that Yellowstone is indicating a stationary plume at around 45 degrees North and that the reversal of continental drift would indicate that. While wrong with taking mount st Helens as a marker to reverse this continental drift, the theory is valid. Like you said, its a fact.

Did I say the Yellowstone hotspot wasn't stationary?

So what's your problem than?

 

[Dutch]

So? Are you going to claim that large areas of Oregon, Nevada and Idaho are special too? Do your timelines go back 16 million years?

???? I don't see what this has to do with the Yellowstone plume

 

[Dutch]

That's everyone but you, Dutch. See a problem in that?

That doesn't mean it isn't true

 

[Dutch]

No, HDD is irrelevant to reality. You're making it up based on your own misconceptions. You even admit it, by saying HDD's based on "perceptions". Perceptions are fallible, faulty, vague. The truth sits in the middle and knows, to quote Robert Frost.

While 50% is a bit much to ask I'm afraid, I would be very pleased if you would consider only 1%. It's a start.
HDdesign is initially based on intuition and synchronicities followed by rational application of the described elements of HDDesign that find confirmation instantly.

 

[Sideroxylon]

That doesn't mean it isn't true

No, Dutch, it doesn't and you will cling to that. However only you being able to see these alleged synchronicities should suggest to you that your own cognitive biases are a likely explanation. How have you ruled that out?

 

[Paul]

I was talking about the Yellowstone hotspot, which indeed appears to be stationairy around 45 degrees North.

The hotspot is stationary, the North American plate isn't.

Your remark doesn't make any sense at all, I hope you understand that.

Apparently I will have to simplify things even more: You are claiming significance in the fact that you think that Island Park - a very long, very narrow town - and Yellowstone National Park - a 2 and a quarter million acre park - might have moved over the same area.

We now know that the direction of the movement of the Nort American plate is west-south west.

You now know, because someone else had to tell you.

I just took the wrong marker to 'recalculate' the HD Cube spot around 45 degrees Nort near Yellowstone

Why are you so vague?

It's pathetic that you constantly tell us how important HDD is but when it comes down to it, your precision is 2¼ million acres and 45 degrees north. And even then it's around and near.

but the therory is valid.

You don't have a theory.

I should have taken Island Park etc., which is indeed confirming the initial idea.

And you still can't see the problem with this.

 

[Paul]

So what's your problem than?

Apparently that you cannot understand simple answers and that you continue to ignore relevant questions such as "What do you mean by feeding?".

 

[Paul]

???? I don't see what this has to do with the Yellowstone plume

That's because you do absolutely no research or basic fact checking before you spout unsupported nonsense.

 

[Daylightstar]

a perfect example of a useless remark, contributes nothing at all.
...

It's about putting you in front of a mirror. Your remark:

I don't think I am less polite yet, reason enough to do so though

A claim of not having displayed a negative behavior being reason enough to display that negative behavior, is indeed pretty barbaric.

Not only that, it evidently is a useless remark:

... So no need to be less polite yet

It contributes nothing at all.

Not at all, it should be clear that I was talking about the determination of the theoretical HD Cube spot near Yellowstone at aprox. 45 degrees North. ...

It should be clear to you that you insisted to calculate whatever specifically asked:

not at all. ask specifically and I will calculate it .

come on, ask it.

You have never provided the calculations I asked, anywhere.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6802560&postcount=4071
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8074959&postcount=4973
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8103709&postcount=5040
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8107338&postcount=5063

You are a certified lier.

In the above situation one of the questions was:

Another one:

Please 'recalculate' the HD Cube spot near mount St. Helens for us.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6648023&postcount=3815

...
So if we recalculate the HD Cube spot near mount St. Helens, we have to reverse the continental drift so to speek
...

...

And yet, although evidently no such calculations exist, and you evidently lied about them existing, multiple times, you simply repeat the same claim of having recalculated an (unevidenced) 'HD Cube spot:

... I just took the wrong marker to 'recalculate' the HD Cube spot around 45 degrees Nort near Yellowstone, ...

^{Highlite by Daylightstar}But what's that???? You suddenly have added single quotes around the word "recalculate", just to attempt to avoid being confronted with you not being able to show any such recalculation of an unevidenced HD Cube spot.

But in spite of the sudden single quotes around the word "recalulate", the fact remains, you never provided the calculations. And yet, like a true fraud, you continue undisturbed by the facts, with your claim of recalculating an (unevidenced) HD Cube spot.
And true to your style, you continue lying about it all.

 

[Daylightstar]

My last post was a reply to this. Nope. not demolised at all.

Actually, you demolished yourself in post 23.

... its on the first page already!!!!
...

Through your 365/360 debacle, you multiply a contextually meaningless degree value with another contextually meaningless degree value and you call the result a number in days.

The lines containing numbers and values aren't even actual calculations.

...
The funny/sad thing is that Dutch is doing random elementary arithmetic, without actually calculating anything.
The "EXACTLY!" thing is indeed bizarre.

Come weasel, come come come. Come out from wherever you are.

 

[Daylightstar]

...
HDdesign is initially based on intuition and synchronicities followed by rational application of the described elements of HDDesign that find confirmation instantly.

A broken mind (yours) does not provide whole thoughts.

 

[The Man]

I don't want to be something more, I just notice something more.
I do recognize all these 'coincidences' and synchronicities while working with this stuff. That's what I share.

What you notice is just your own inclinations and you wanting it to be something more and that's what you don't recognize.

 

[The Man]

Man, what I mean is that some posters here are treating me with very little respect and calling me whatever they want. Some aren't very polite and they accuse me of alot of things while they also aren't giving the impression that they are seriously dealing with my answers.
I have reason enough to be less polite in these cases but I guess it's not worth it so I can let it rest until now. So no need to be less polite yet

Once again quoting a post from me and deliberately addressing your response to some other user named "Man". Please try harder Dutch. Evidently you simply aren't as polite (among other things) as you would just like to imagine.

 

[The Man]

We have a 3D reality ( + time ) that we find ourselves alive in.

Space-time is 3+1 dimensions (3 bidirectional and 1 unidirectional), which is irrelevant as you don't calculate in space-time. The actual number of independent dimensions involved in what we refer to as reality is a matter of current debate and research. Again also irrelevant as you only calculate in one dimension, time.

If other dimensional realms, or if you prefer expressions of consciouness at other levels, indeed exist, than the 'link' between them would be our perception of time. All intelligent correlations are based on our perception of time, that's what HDDesign is about.
That's where the synchronicities and 'coincidences' occur.

Unmitigated nonsense, " expressions of consciouness at other levels" is not the basis of an independent dimension. Though it is a common adulteration of the meaning of dimension. Your problem seems to be conflating the two. The mathematical definition of dimension that defines space-time as 3+1 and the fantasy usage of dimension as some " expressions of consciouness at other levels". Again actually irrelevant as the fact remains you only calculate in one dimension, time. Regardless of what your reasons are Dutch

 

[Dutch]

No, Dutch, it doesn't and you will cling to that. However only you being able to see these alleged synchronicities should suggest to you that your own cognitive biases are a likely explanation. How have you ruled that out?

I know from my own experience, that from the moment I started to do this 'research' what came to be the HDDesign material, unprecedented coincidences and synchronicities started to occur, pinpointing at hidden intelligent correlations that could be used for future expectations based on timecoded patterns and direct links based a a few basic mathematical principles. I do understand what is commonly accepted to be a coincidence and what statistically could be expected.
I don't see any reason why somebody else wouldn't notice these 'coincidences' once he seriously decides to work with it.

 

[Dutch]

Originally Posted by Dutch
I was talking about the Yellowstone hotspot, which indeed appears to be stationairy around 45 degrees North.

Paul:

"The hotspot is stationary, the North American plate isn't."

That means that the hotspot is stationary around 45 Degrees North ( Cube latitude ). The volcanoes move along with the crust to the west-south west.
get it?

 

[Dutch]

Paul:

Apparently I will have to simplify things even more: You are claiming significance in the fact that you think that Island Park - a very long, very narrow town - and Yellowstone National Park - a 2 and a quarter million acre park - might have moved over the same area

Island Park Caldera Paul.

Paul, I'm sorry to have to say this, but that's exactly what it means.

Continental crust movement over a stationairy plume.

It's science and fact, you just don't understand it

skeptical mind is one thing but...

 

[Dutch]

You now know, because someone else had to tell you.

Indeed, and I am glad I have been told. Should have happened years ago because it proves the theory without a single doubt now.

Instead of making useless remarks, it would suit you to try to contribute with meaningful information too.

 

[Dutch]

Paul:

Why are you so vague?

It's pathetic that you constantly tell us how important HDD is but when it comes down to it, your precision is 2¼ million acres and 45 degrees north. And even then it's around and near.

Could you please try to understand first Paul?

Read the previous posts again about this subject. Take a look at the information avaiable on the internet about the Yellowstone plume and the implications that crustal move has had in the post on the environment.

There's a series of caldera's that have found their common origin from a stationary plume around 45 degrees North.

That's it, should be clear. I cannot help you any further if you can't understand this.

 

[Dutch]

Paul:

Why are you so vague?

It's pathetic that you constantly tell us how important HDD is but when it comes down to it, your precision is 2¼ million acres and 45 degrees north. And even then it's around and near.

Could you please try to understand first Paul?

Read the previous posts again about this subject. Take a look at the information avaiable on the internet about the Yellowstone plume and the implications that crustal move has had in the past on the environment.

There's a series of caldera's that have found their common origin from a stationary plume around 45 degrees North.

That's it, should be clear. I cannot help you any further if you can't understand this.