Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Darby:

Other than that, all of calculations are simply numerology. I happen to be a Christian and come from Western European "stock". No problem and certainly not a religious statement. It goes to what I consider the calendar, the names of the days and months and the numbers assigned to them. I accept, for example, that November 11th, 2001 is 9-11 (2001).

That is a date that you've made hay over for quite some time. But here's the problem. THere's nothing at all fundamental, as far as the universe goes, with the Gregorian calendar. November 11, 2001 might be, well...November 11, 2001...to Western astrogloers and numerologists but it was not "9-11" for instance in Israel. It was 12-23 there. In China it was 7-24.

It doesn't matter which calendar you use. The system is applicable on each calendar, you can determine 2 dots of a HD Tetrahedron based on a chinese calendar aswell. The point is, that 9/11 happened in the US and based on the perception of time as used in the US, the initial thought was to determine the dots of 2 HD Tetrahedrons with opposite direction, one based at the start of the year, the other at half a year. This way September 11 is determined as one of these dots ( consistent with 19.47 degrees in geometry). 9/11 was an eyeopener event and it appeared that 911 days from 9/11 another dot of this HD Tetrahedron is determined: around March 11, 2004 ( leap year ), the date of the Madrid bombings.
These 2 events unveiled the HD Tetrahedron for the first time and I've called this determination the HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel. In fact you can create such Tetrahedrons based on every start date, based on every calendar. As you might know, 9/11 and the Madrid bombings were 912 days apart but still within the +/- 1 day timeframes around the determined peak dates. We know now that the 'peak' dates should in fact be 913 days apart ( exactly 2,5 years ), but 9/11 and the Madrid Bombings are with the +/- 1 day timeframes around the determined peak dates.

I have used the timeframe between 9/11 and the Madrid bombings as a starting point of a Golden Mean based timecoded pattern going 'inwards' in our perception of time, resulting in keydates (+/- 1 day) with each turn in the spiral. It doesn't really change much if this spiral is used on 912 or 913 days, but now I know the best starting position should be 913, the exact number of days between 2 'peak'dates of a HD Tetrahedron.

As I have already admitted here, it does make a difference when you try to monitor an ongoing pattern based on these HD Tetrahedron spot, over time it does make a significant difference if you take steps of 911 or 913 days. The latter would be correct and because I have used 911 days in the past I noticed that the patterns seemed off with a few days, because expected 'underlying themes' appeared to materialize late. I have abandoned these ongoin 911 based patterns and they aren't mentioned on the timelines, except 1 stpe of 911 days when the difference doesn't matter much.

The killings of Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh were 911 days apart for instance. The spiral inward gave indeed significant hits as monitored in a specific thread in the HDDesign material, an 911 based ongoing pattern did not, as is to be expected now because steps of 913 days had to be used. So 913 is the timeframe between 2 peak dates of a HD Tetrahedron, 911 days is the 'soonest, or shortest' timeframe to find expression of related underlying themes ( due to the +/- 1 day timeframe around determined dates)

The Earth, let alone the universe, does not twirl around a calendar invented by a Catholic priest. The Golden Mean Phi is not a fundamental number. It is valid as an approximation only in plane geometry where the plane is flat. Lay out a triangle on the plane of the Earth such that the scope of the construct covers a few kilometers and you will suddenly discover that the sum of the interior angles is somewhat more than 180 degrees.

I differ with you that the Golden Mean is not a fundamental number, its omnipresent in nature and in space. Time is the 'key' between our 3D reality and other dimensional realms. HDDesign uses the Golden Mean on our perception of time, based on the number of rotations of Earth in an orbit around the sun ( days that means ). It's irrelevant how Earth's orbit looks like, its shape and the like. The only thing that matters is the duration as expressed in Earth days, that's where the intelligent correlations show up by synchronicities etc.
 
Darby:
Start at the North Pole (and for the sake of the argument we will assume - incorrectly but its not important - that the circumference of both the polar and equatorial Earth distances is 24,000 miles...a "perfect circle"). Lay a straight line running due south to the eqator - 6,000 miles. At the equator turn left and lay out another line 6,000 miles. You now have a right angle 6,000 miles on a side. It looks like we're sarting to construct an isosceles right triangle. So, next turn left 45 degrees and start back in a northerly direction. Go that way for, oh, 8485.25 miles (sqrt (a^2+b^2) = hypotenuse). You should be right back to where you started, right? Plane geometry says that's the case. But that's not where you will end up. You will miss the North Pole by a a few thousand miles.

I can't see what this has to do with our perception of time, it's totally irrelevant in relation to this HDDesign 'research'.
 
The lesson? You can't lay out large geometric figures and simply assume that the geometry will fit what we're given in basic middle school geometry. We certainly can't lay out such constructs where the sides are millions of miles in length and make statements like, "And that's EXACTLY xxx days (weeks, years, degrees)!!!!!!" such as you do. The real world does not work that way.

I agree Darby, but this has nothing to do with our perception of time. The geometrical correlations only exist between specific rotations of a planet.

Your are looking at shapes, while there is no shape in HDdesign when it comes to our perception of time. I truly think you need to change the way you look at it. The geometry is consistent, based on our perception of time.
 
And lest we not forget, I've seen you post astronomical data where you've taken two numbers that are calculated to two decimel points, multiply them together and, again, make a statement, "And that's EXACTLY xxx.xxx!!!"

I'm not sure where you are referring at, but when it comes to determining a timeframe ( +/- 1 day ) it could.
 
Hogwash. The original numbers are given to two decimal accuracy. They've been rounded up or down - and there's no problem doing that. But this is not pure math. It is astronomy. Multiply those two numbers together and you'll have a result calculated out to, as you would state, three decimal places. You can't do that - and you especially can't honestly make statements as I gave above. If you multiply two numbers together that have been rounded to two decimal points your result is only accurate to one decimal point, not three. When you multiplied the numbers together you also multipilied the rounding factor by the same amount. I've seen you do that when making a calculation over the course of 2222 days. If you haev a number rounded down to three decimel places the final answer is off by a factor of 2+.

Sorry to rag on and on about the math but you introduced it and have made the "EXACTLY...!!!!!!" statements for a decade. It isn't "exactly" - it is an approximation.

As far as it is connected to the determination of timeframes it isn't. I am not talking about geometrically determined locations in 3D, I am talking about our perception of time. I use a +/- 1 day rounding which is perfectly normal as we have different timezones on Earth. I have repeatedly said that this +/- 1 day limitation is in fact way too rigid and that we have to look at a window around a peak date. I, for one, have noticed that such a window around a predetermined peak date, opens up at least 3 days before and closest not sooner than 3 days after. This timeframe is where the related synchronicities occur, or where expected underlying themes find theis expressions.
 
Dutch also doesn't understand the idea that expressing things in "Earth days" while at the same time attempting to apply a bit of plane geometry is meaningless due to the differing orbital speeds of the planets.

Again, shape or speed are irrelevant, I only use orbital periods.

HDDesign linked to our perception of time ( rotation of planets that is )
 
But since the earth's orbit is an ellipse and not a circle doesn't that make everything that follows a bunch of bull? Or do you deny that the earth's orbit is an ellipse?

I don't care less about shapes, I only talk about our perception of time.

Even if Earth would have an squared orbit ( which is ridiculous of course), the geometry still fits as long as it is based on our perception of time: orbital periods.
 
Dutch,

I mean the following in all sincerity:

You have your beliefs. No one, no matter what they say, will ever change that. That being said, you’ve posted items over the past decade with the intent of changing other people’s opinions about reality. You’ve used calculations, correct or not, to make predictions about future events and from your POV they all seem to come to pass.

The issue might be expressed in your thoughts on Syria. At some point you might say (and have said) – on such-and-such date I predict that something will come up of importance concerning Syria. Sure enough, when that date comes up you find something in the Internet news that you consider significant concerning Syria. You decide that because something that you consider important about Syria comes up on that date that it is proof of your methodology.

Well Darby, as you might know I have a huge focus on the Hariri assassination, which has happened on a HD Cube date. I have said numerous times that this assassination was the initial trigger in an evolving 'Syria first' war scenario. I have been saying this for years now.
The assassination of Rafik Hariri was the initial effort to get rid of the Assad clan. I have been monitoring this situation for years now and you bet I will post about it
 
What you haven’t done either for us or for yourself, is this:

Take three dice. One die is three sided with the sides numbered 2012, 2013 and 2014. Take a 12-sided die with numbers 1, 2, 3…12. Last take a 31-sided die numbered 1, 2, 3…31. Cast the three die and you come up with a date between 1-1-2012 and 12-31-2014. Then make a prediction that something significant will occur in Syria on that date. When that date comes to pass do a Google for news from Syria. It’s a 100% guarantee that you will find something “significant.” What does it mean? Randomness. Depending on the specific type of data if you run a Z-test, T-test, Chi Square test or any other statistical test you will find that the results are no more significant that randomness.

The difference is, that HDdesign seems to be able to detect the hidden underlying patterns, based on intuitive thoughts and synchronicities.

If something appears random to you and all of us, than this doesn mean that there is no hidden Intelligent underlying Design. Normally we just don't understand these patterns, nor are we able to detect them.

While working with HDDesign, suddenly these intuitive ideas and synchronicities occur, enabling us to detect the underlying patterns.
 
Darby:

QUOTE]I’ve actually read your posts. Fancy that.
[/QUOTE]

You aren't giving the impression that you've actually done so. It appears to me that you don't understand what I am talking about. That's oke.
It's rather strange that after all these years, you haven't got a single clue what this HDdesign is really about. I think you haven't read previous discussions or you haven't really thought about the matter.

If we cut away the chaff and cut to the heart of your “method” all that it does is come up with an approximate date “plus or minus 1 day”. That’s all it is – a somewhat complex three-die tossing machine that outputs a date. As you’ve admitted, what is to occur on that date is something that you “feel”, intuition, whatever. Methodologically it has no connection with tetrahydra, squares, lines or LGM’s. It’s just Dutch's opinion. Dutch might be correct, might be deluded or even might be delusional. But whatever it is, as referred to a few days ago, it is likely an ad hoc, propter hoc fallacy because nothing has ever been proferred that proves a nexus between HDD and “Dutch’s feelings”.

I wouldn't have shared this material if there weren't any 'coincidences' or synchronicities spinning off while dealing with this stuff. You completely disregard that fact
 
So you had a totally unsupported idea about something which you proceeded to incorporate into HDD without doing even the most basic of research.

YES! logged realtime! I log everything realtime without research, that's the power of HDDesign. The initial thought to reverse the continental drift is valid, I only was mistaken to take mount st helens as the marker


That's why we keep telling you to actually check things properly.

If you had done so, you would have come up with the same correction

Making everything you have written on the subject wrong.

To the contrarairy

Riiight, the really genuinely real thing with mount St Helens was total nonsense, but if you guess some more and massage the data 'til it bleeds you might be able to squeeze another geographical feature into the frame
.

Nope, as i have explained in a previous post above, both Yellowstone and 'the First Fase of Yellowstone' finds their same source of a stationairy plume around 45 degrees North.


I find it hard to believe that even you are trying to claim that they both occupied the same physical space.

Due to continental drift of the North American plate, they both drifted over the same stationairy plume yes. That's fact, not a claim



Sad and pathetic attempt to salvage a garbage idea by inventing a 'new and better' idea that just happens to use all the same crap as the previous one.

Are you saying that the plume Yellowstone is feeding isn't stationairy?

Your remarks are totally off here.
 

The Hyper Dimensional dates based on Platonic Solid Geometry originate from other dimensional realms and therefor it's only by Geometry that their existence could be unveiled, as they are invisible in our 3 dimensional reality.

As Hyper Dimensional Physics has everything to do with rotation, our solar system with all it's rotating elements, could be considered the 3 dimensional counterpart of a Hyper Dimensional system, at least that's what my research is trying to get confirmed.

The Hyperdimensional initiated activities in our solarsystem become visible by 3 dimensional activities on the determined interference points based on Platonic Solid geometry

The Tetrahedron is a Platonic Solid that unveils it's existence at the well known location of 19.47 degrees North and South latitude when placed within a closed sphere, such as the Sun or a planet.

With our perception of time, it is different. When a Hyper Dimensional Platic Solid is placed upon Earth's orbit around the Sun, they aren't directly visible because they originate from another dimension. If you want to visualize it , than the solids would look in our dimensions as flat and rolled-over (placed upon Earth's orbit around the Sun )
Their existences can only unveiled by Geometry and the interference points on Earth's orbit correspond with our system of dates.
Because of the fact that there are more days in a year than degrees in a circle, time differences on Earth and unknown exact 3D length of the Hyper Dimensional interference points, we should always extend the timeframe with a correction of +/- 1 day for each determined date.
Hyper Dimensional dates:
Our Earth makes a turn around the sun of 360 degrees. When a hyper -tetrahedron is placed upon that circle our Earth is making, than the Tetrahedron intersection points can be determined. The interference points are placed 19.47 degrees above and below the line 90-270 degrees on the circle. So 90 degrees + and - 19.47 degrees and 270 degrees + and - 19.47 degrees
or from the start of the year in our perspective: 90 degrees minus 19.47 = 70.53 times 365/360 = 71.5 days
In other words, our earth crosses the HD Tetrahedron ( originating from another dimension!) interference point in the eather 70.53 days after the start of the year.
This way the dates March 11-12 , April 21 , September 11 and October 21 are determined:
(90 - 19.47) times 365/360 = day 71.5 or March 12 +/- 1 day
(90 + 19.47) times 365/360 = day 111 or April 21 +/- 1 day
(270 - 19.47) times 365/360 = day 254 or September 11 +/- 1 day
(270 + 19.47) times 365/360 = day 293 or October 20 +/- 1 day
The other Platonic solids also give interference points or dates in our perspective, like the Cube dates for sinstance:
45 times 365/360 = day 45 or February 14 +/- 1 day
135 times 365/360 = day 137 or May 17 +/- 1 day
225 times 365/360 = day 228 or August 16 +/- 1 day
315 times 365/360 = day 319 or November 15 +/- 1 day
Hyperdimensional Octahedron dates ( at equator):
April 1-2
October 1
The Hyper Dimensional Octahedron and Tetrahedron Pole dates are on the start/end of a year and July 2
Be aware of the fact that leap years will have a slightly different outcome
When we talk about our perception of time and Hyper Dimensional Design we are not looking at a 3D closed sphere (such as a planet ). Earth travels through a point in (Hyper)space and the Tetrahedron or Cube etc reveils it's existence by Geometry.

You call me a liar Day? its on the first page already!!!!

I'm not going through the rest of the thread but it has been discussed several times.

You need to apologize
 
In which you explain darby is right?
I've given you plenty of chances, I can only assume that either you are an actual idiot, or that you are completely incapable of comprehending my posts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom