Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

be specific Paul. You aren't helping to maintain a decent conversation

 

[Paul]

YES! logged realtime! I log everything realtime without research, that's the power of HDDesign.

On the contrary, that's the complete failure of HDD; you just say stuff and never check if it is nonsense before incorporating it.

The initial thought to reverse the continental drift is valid, I only was mistaken to take mount st helens as the marker

That's quite a big mistake, considering your solution is to say that a massive National Park a small town once passed over the same general area as each other and are both hundreds of miles from mount St. Helens.

If you had done so, you would have come up with the same correction

It's not a correction, it's an entirely new guess with even less validity than the original one.

To the contrarairy

Nope, anything incorporating the self admitted nonsense of mount St. Helens is wrong.

Nope, as i have explained in a previous post above, both Yellowstone and 'the First Fase of Yellowstone' finds their same source of a stationairy plume around 45 degrees North.

I don't know what that means due to the arrangement of words not making any sense, but you do realise how big Yellowstone National Park is, don't you?

Due to continental drift of the North American plate, they both drifted over the same stationairy plume yes. That's fact, not a claim

So? Are you going to claim that large areas of Oregon, Nevada and Idaho are special too? Do your timelines go back 16 million years?

Are you saying that the plume Yellowstone is feeding isn't stationairy?

Did I say the Yellowstone hotspot wasn't stationary?

What do you mean by feeding?

 

[Daylightstar]

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8103709&postcount=5040

You call me a liar Day? its on the first page already!!!!

I'm not going through the rest of the thread but it has been discussed several times.

You need to apologize

I have to do no such thing.

My relevant question:

Another one:

Please 'recalculate' the HD Cube spot near mount St. Helens for us.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6648023&postcount=3815

...
So if we recalculate the HD Cube spot near mount St. Helens, we have to reverse the continental drift so to speek
...

...

In your post quoted above, where you quoted yourself, nothing that even remotely resembles 'recalculating the HD Cube spot near mount St. Helens' through 'reversing the continental drift' can be found.

As far as the first question from the list ( or list) is concerned

I will ask you specifically to show the calculations for transforming a hyper dimensional platonic solid into geometrically determined orbital positions of an orbiting planet.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5982570&postcount=2849 30th May 2010
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5988629&postcount=2851

No calculations were ever provided by you.

Mind you:

not at all. ask specifically and I will calculate it .

come on, ask it.

So, both requests for calculations (on your insistence) have not been honored by you.
No calculations, no references or links to those calculations.
Evidently, the term liar describes you very well.

Go back to your 'cage' ..... and use your time there to do some 'research'.

 

[Daylightstar]

... “Dutch’s feelings”.

... suddenly these intuitive ideas ...

I wouldn't have shared this material if there weren't any 'coincidences' or synchronicities spinning off while dealing with this stuff. You completely disregard that fact

'Feelings' and 'intuition', that's what it's all about:

... indeed it is a psychic exercise.
...

Your judgement with respect to sharing your 'feelings' and 'intuition' or not, is not trustworthy, it's evidently worthless.

 

[Daylightstar]

I don't think I am less polite yet, reason enough to do so though

Sounds pretty barbaric.

 

[The Man]

Darby:


I can't see what this has to do with our perception of time, it's totally irrelevant in relation to this HDDesign 'research'.

Exactly Dutch, once again demonstrating and expressly affirming that your Dimensional Design Hype is entirely one dimensional (just time) and singularly based just on your “perception of time”.

 

[The Man]

I don't think I am less polite yet, reason enough to do so though

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please Dutch, I beseech of thee not to go there!!!! Do you understand the HDD ramifications of your ‘less politeness’?!?! In ain’t just a freak’n tetrahedron its a dodecahedron, from another dimension (those are the worst), of pain.!!! The suffering would be reprehensible, please think of the children!!!

Other than that, best of luck with your new and forth coming “less polite” approach. It could hardly do worse than your current and previous ‘less informed’ approach.

 

[jsfisher]

I thought his relationship with the tetrahedron was purely platonic.

 

[The Man]

I thought his relationship with the tetrahedron was purely platonic.

Yea, but he just wants it to be something more. Taking it to a different level of cohabitating relationship. Unbeknownst to us and, evidently, him.

 

[DarbyII]

Darby:



It doesn't matter which calendar you use. The system is applicable on each calendar

Proove it.

I've seen dozens of posts where you've specifically referred to 9-11, 1111 (11-11), multiples of 11-11, etc. and based your calculations on the numerology of those specific date references. These are Gregorian calendar dates.

So, proove it. Pick another calendar, tell us which calendar it is, use the same relative reference on the Gregorian calendar (11-11, 9-11) and show us the numbers and how they stun you.

 

[Dutch]

Proove it.

I've seen dozens of posts where you've specifically referred to 9-11, 1111 (11-11), multiples of 11-11, etc. and based your calculations on the numerology of those specific date references. These are Gregorian calendar dates.

So, proove it. Pick another calendar, tell us which calendar it is, use the same relative reference on the Gregorian calendar (11-11, 9-11) and show us the numbers and how they stun you.

1111 days 'awakeningstimeframe' around a monitored eventsday in the middle. Choose whatever calendar you like. As long as it is based on Earth's orbital period it doesn't matter at all. The fact that you don't seem to understand this indicates that you've probably have NEVER read or tried to understand the material.

 

[Dutch]

Yea, but he just wants it to be something more. Taking it to a different level of cohabitating relationship. Unbeknownst to us and, evidently, him.

I don't want to be something more, I just notice something more.
I do recognize all these 'coincidences' and synchronicities while working with this stuff. That's what I share.

 

[Dutch]

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please Dutch, I beseech of thee not to go there!!!! Do you understand the HDD ramifications of your ‘less politeness’?!?! In ain’t just a freak’n tetrahedron its a dodecahedron, from another dimension (those are the worst), of pain.!!! The suffering would be reprehensible, please think of the children!!!

Other than that, best of luck with your new and forth coming “less polite” approach. It could hardly do worse than your current and previous ‘less informed’ approach.

Man, what I mean is that some posters here are treating me with very little respect and calling me whatever they want. Some aren't very polite and they accuse me of alot of things while they also aren't giving the impression that they are seriously dealing with my answers.
I have reason enough to be less polite in these cases but I guess it's not worth it so I can let it rest until now. So no need to be less polite yet

 

[Dutch]

Exactly Dutch, once again demonstrating and expressly affirming that your Dimensional Design Hype is entirely one dimensional (just time) and singularly based just on your “perception of time”.

We have a 3D reality ( + time ) that we find ourselves alive in.

If other dimensional realms, or if you prefer expressions of consciouness at other levels, indeed exist, than the 'link' between them would be our perception of time. All intelligent correlations are based on our perception of time, that's what HDDesign is about.
That's where the synchronicities and 'coincidences' occur.

 

[Dutch]

Sounds pretty barbaric.

a perfect example of a useless remark, contributes nothing at all.

Why are you doing this and why does everybody accepts this?

If I would say it onces the heat would be on.

 

[Dutch]

'Feelings' and 'intuition', that's what it's all about:

Your judgement with respect to sharing your 'feelings' and 'intuition' or not, is not trustworthy, it's evidently worthless.

Its worthless to those who decide to ignore all these 'coincidences' and synchronicities.

 

[Sideroxylon]

Its worthless to those who decide to ignore all these 'coincidences' and synchronicities.

That's everyone but you, Dutch. See a problem in that?

 

[Orphia Nay]

Darby:

Start at the North Pole (and for the sake of the argument we will assume - incorrectly but its not important - that the circumference of both the polar and equatorial Earth distances is 24,000 miles...a "perfect circle"). Lay a straight line running due south to the eqator - 6,000 miles. At the equator turn left and lay out another line 6,000 miles. You now have a right angle 6,000 miles on a side. It looks like we're sarting to construct an isosceles right triangle. So, next turn left 45 degrees and start back in a northerly direction. Go that way for, oh, 8485.25 miles (sqrt (a^2+b^2) = hypotenuse). You should be right back to where you started, right? Plane geometry says that's the case. But that's not where you will end up. You will miss the North Pole by a a few thousand miles.

I can't see what this has to do with our perception of time, it's totally irrelevant in relation to this HDDesign 'research'.

No, HDD is irrelevant to reality. You're making it up based on your own misconceptions. You even admit it, by saying HDD's based on "perceptions". Perceptions are fallible, faulty, vague. The truth sits in the middle and knows, to quote Robert Frost.

 

[Dutch]

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8103709&postcount=5040

My relevant question:

In your post quoted above, where you quoted yourself, nothing that even remotely resembles 'recalculating the HD Cube spot near mount St. Helens' through 'reversing the continental drift' can be found.

As far as the first question from the list ( or list) is concerned


No calculations were ever provided by you.

Mind you:


So, both requests for calculations (on your insistence) have not been honored by you.
No calculations, no references or links to those calculations.
Evidently, the term liar describes you very well.

Go back to your 'cage' ..... and use your time there to do some 'research'.

Not at all, it should be clear that I was talking about the determination of the theoretical HD Cube spot near Yellowstone at aprox. 45 degrees North.
I took Mount st. Helens as a marker to reverse the continental drift, assuming the North American plae was moving to the North - North west.

While I was wrong to take Mount st helens as the marker, the theory is still valid. The North American plate moves west-south west:

Yellowstone lies over a hotspot where light, hot, molten mantle rock rises towards the surface. While the Yellowstone hotspot is now under the Yellowstone Plateau, it previously helped create the eastern Snake River Plain (to the west of Yellowstone) through a series of huge volcanic eruptions. Although the hotspot's apparent motion is to the east-northeast, the North American Plate is really moving west-southwest over the stationary hotspot in the Earth's mantle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_Caldera

The Yellowstone hotspot, also referred to as the Snake River Plain-Yellowstone hotspot, is a volcanic hotspot responsible for large scale volcanism in Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, and Wyoming, United States. It created the eastern Snake River Plain through a succession of caldera forming eruptions. The resulting calderas include the Island Park Caldera, the Henry's Fork Caldera, and the Bruneau-Jarbidge caldera. The hotspot currently lies under the Yellowstone Caldera

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_hotspot

 

[Dutch]

Paul:

That's quite a big mistake, considering your solution is to say that a massive National Park a small town once passed over the same general area as each other and are both hundreds of miles from mount St. Helens.

I was talking about the Yellowstone hotspot, which indeed appears to be stationairy around 45 degrees North.

Your remark doesn't make any sense at all, I hope you understand that.

If the North American plate was indeed moving to west-Northwest, than Mount st Helens would have been once at the same geometrical area as current Yellowstone location: above the stationairy plume.

We now know that the direction of the movement of the Nort American plate is west-south west. I just took the wrong marker to 'recalculate' the HD Cube spot around 45 degrees Nort near Yellowstone, but the therory is valid. I should have taken Island Park etc., which is indeed confirming the initial idea.