I gassed up this morning at the Citgo in Plaistow NH. Looked like business as usual. Screw Bush.
Hugo Chavez could easily be elected to congress by NH thanks to right-thinking granite staters like yourself.
I gassed up this morning at the Citgo in Plaistow NH. Looked like business as usual. Screw Bush.
Hugo Chavez could easily be elected to congress by NH thanks to right-thinking granite staters like yourself.
What, has Bush been saying we shouldn't gas up at Citgo?
Oil at $70 a barrel explains that. What they want to pay their CEO is Exxon's bussiness.
I am wondering if he doesn't expect this and how it impacts or meshes with his stated plans of providing free heating oil to over 400,000 poor Americans this winter as a PR gesture. If Americans don't buy the stuff expect him to give it away.
I don't believe that our money means a great deal to him if he is a dyed in the wool communist. Plus he can get what he needs from elsewhere such as China.
It's our business if we're being robbed by being sold an overpriced product. And since Exxon can afford to throw away 400 mil on an already rich disgusting fat pig, I'd say the market was cheated out of, atleast, 400 million dollars. And I’ll reiterate, it's really sad that a foreign leader offers Americans low price oil while an American robber baron gets obscenely wealthy off our backs.
How do you feel about the fact that Chavez's largesse to the American poor comes at the expense of his own more numerous Venezuelan poor? Do you really believe he gives a flying fart about "the poor"? He's playing the demagogue game, nothing more, nothing less. At least your robber baron did something to earn his $400 million, and that money comes out of the pockets of the shareholders of his company, not the U.S. treasury. Chavez, OTOH, is robbing his own country's treasury because he thinks it's cool to pretend he's Robin Hood.It's our business if we're being robbed by being sold an overpriced product. And since Exxon can afford to throw away 400 mil on an already rich disgusting fat pig, I'd say the market was cheated out of, atleast, 400 million dollars. And I’ll reiterate, it's really sad that a foreign leader offers Americans low price oil while an American robber baron gets obscenely wealthy off our backs.
How do you feel about the fact that Chavez's largesse to the American poor comes at the expense of his own more numerous Venezuelan poor?
Do you really believe he gives a flying fart about "the poor"? He's playing the demagogue game, nothing more, nothing less.
Chavez, OTOH, is robbing his own country's treasury because he thinks it's cool to pretend he's Robin Hood.
Funny, even after the Soviet Union collapsed, even after China has become wealthy by embracing capitalism, even when two economic beggar-class countries, Cuba and North Korea, are today's face of communism, you can still find apologists for the most successful misery-and-death creating system ever devised by the mind of man. Lincoln was right; you can fool some of the people all of the time.
That's not quite the spin you put on it the first time:Let me clear something up. I don't praise Chavez for offering the oil, and I question his intentions. I'm just making the sad observation that a foreigner is offering to take care of Americans before they take care of their own.
Then you were blasting the American robber baron and his "obscene" wealth (you didn't call him a capitalist pig, but I'm sure that was just an oversight on your part), while observing that a foreigner was "offering to take care of Americans."And I’ll reiterate, it's really sad that a foreign leader offers Americans low price oil while an American robber baron gets obscenely wealthy off our backs.
I'll be happy to discuss that laughable assertion with you in another thread, if you care to start it. Here it's a complete derail.Take a look in the mirror; you're doing exactly what you describe above when you apologize for Christian atrocities, something that has a longer and more brutal history than communism.
You just find his robbing his country's treasury to score some cheap political points with the ignoranti somehow admirable.Furthermore, since I agree with you about Chavez, it's a laughable assertion that I'm apologizing for Chavez.
.....I don't expect to get anything from him, but I think he's quite capable of giving freebies to the poor here in order to foster class warfare.......
That's not quite the spin you put on it the first time:
Then you were blasting the American robber baron and his "obscene" wealth (you didn't call him a capitalist pig, but I'm sure that was just an oversight on your part), while observing that a foreigner was "offering to take care of Americans."
And if you think Americans don't "take care of their own," you need to spend a little time looking at the federal budget; you'll find that we "take care of our own" to the tune of close to a trillion - that's trillion, with a "t" - dollars a year.
Let's get one thing straight, okay? That single robber baron has done more to improve the human condition all by himself than all your "share-the-wealth" and "redistribute-the-land" demagogues who ever existed.
He creates wealth; your Hugo Chavezes simply try to take it from Peter (skimming a little off the top for himself) so he can get Paul's blubbering gratitude. And simpletons sit back and admire Chavez because they disapprove of Peter.
You just find his robbing his country's treasury to score some cheap political points with the ignoranti somehow admirable.
I worded it different, big deal. That's not "spin".
So what? BTW, Your bit about "capitalist pig" is poisoning the well. Also, I wouldn't consider robber barons capitalists.
If you think that's what I said, you need to read more carefully.
LOL
I see you're as paranoid as ever.
More delusional paranoia.
Rant quotient: 100. Substance quotient: 0.No, I don't. I agree with you (unless you're saying you find Chaves' actions admirable). You're taking a page out of Chavez's book by engaging in the demagoguery. Chavez is obviously your boogie-man du-jour. Your wild and bazaar assertions betray your lack of ability to discuss this rationally.
Rant quotient: 100. Substance quotient: 0.
Oh, sorry. I didn't realize you intended "robber baron" to be a term of praise. My mistake. Glad to hear you've finally seen the light.You give crap, you get crap.
As an aside, notice how BP is whining despite the fact that I agree with him? That's got to be a first.
Oh, sorry. I didn't realize you intended "robber baron" to be a term of praise. My mistake. Glad to hear you've finally seen the light.
Are you saying you agree with my "crap".
Senile or not, I've somehow figured out that "it's" is not the possessive form of "it." It's "its."I see that senility continues to take it's toll.