How do pagans celebrate Christmas?

So you two know each other. Hmmm.

Okay, so my speed reading skills aren't what they used to be.

Still; science, medicine, technology, and proof. Very practical.

Kathy, I was never offended by your thread title, so no apology necessary there. I was, however, a little amazed that someone would come into a forum of any sort and start telling long-time members what they should be doing.
 
Last edited:
Well, the comercial glut that is Mammonmas, um, I mean Christmas is over. We're all probably suffering from the economic hangover that occurs at this point, so, I recommend to take to Credit Card bills and call me in the morning.
 
Anyone here not surprised that neither Christian Dude nor Kurious_Kathy have answered my question above?

And CD, if Kathy has so many problems, why doesn't she simply pray for healing? After all, in John 14:13-14 we read

“And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.

If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.”

It's all so simple! Just pray for healing in Jesus' name, and if he doesn't heal you he's broken his promise! Not much of a Messiah then, is he?

Genesius, sorry, we did not mean to ignore anyone. Up until recently, we have been guilty of reading most of the posts very fast and only skimming some because of the large number. We are taking the time to really sit down and read the posts when we do come to the forum now, and answer the best we can, as many as we can, when they are direct responses and questions to one or both of us.

To give a very quick and basic explanation of how Kathy (to my best understanding) and I believe about this subject, and what we think is the proper context of Jesus is saying.

Kathy has prayed for healing. The Lord has chosen not to answer her prayer on that at this time, or the answer is no.

I believe, and I think Kathy is pretty close to the same belief, that all the teachings about having what we pray for, like when we are told that we do not have because we do not ask, and other similar teachings in scripture, like the one you have quoted, it is because it does not line up with the Lord’s will. I believe it is only when our will lines up with the Lord’s will that the prayer is answered in the positive. I believe the Lord answers every prayer, it is just most get answered with a no because what we are asking for is not best for us or the person we are praying for.

I don’t think it means Jesus has broken any promises to us. One of the main and basic principles of hermeneutics is that scripture interprets scripture. So you have to look at all the teachings on a certain subject in scripture and view them in context as a whole.

Here is a basic view of my stance and opinion on this; it is that when viewing all teachings on this together, you come to the conclusion that it is only when our wants line up with God’s will that we get an answer that is a yes. It is that most of the time what we ask for is not what is best for us, or it is not in alignment with what Jesus is trying to do in our lives, or the in people’s lives that we might be praying for. I said something like this in another thread and a lot of people found it outlandish, and stated they didn't want any part of a God that would do what I am about to suggest. The Lord uses pain, suffering, heartache and things as such, to reach out to, to teach, to change and to bring back his children to him. It is to get us to respond to him and look his direction because he is concerned about our eternity way more than our lives here on Earth. That is only my opinion and I know many people very adamantly disagree.

I don't wish ill on Kathy, and am sorry she undergoes so much pain. I know what constant, chronic pain is, and how debilitating, and yes, unfair, it can be.

What I am about to say will sound cruel, yet it is not my cruelty, but the cruelty of belief.

Kathy, having faith, need only pray, and God will heal her body and mend her pain. Why has this not happened? There are a limited number of possible answers.

1. She has not prayed for healing.
2. She has prayed, but it is God's will that she suffer.
3. She has prayed, but she has a flaw she has not mended, and so God cannot heal her until she does so.
4. There is no God, and she is engaging in wishful thinking when she prays.

My experience with chronic pain alone, never mind the rest of my life, leads me to #4.

It is possible she hasn't bothered to pray for healing (#1), but Christians are exhorted to do just that (see verse below). Reaching God through prayer is, in fact, one of the membership benefits of Christianity. It's one of the big selling points...well, that and the whole "redemption from hell" thing.

If it is God's will that she should suffer (#2), I find it insufferably cruel, and also against the bible:

“Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened. Or what man is there among you who, if his son asks for bread, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will he give him a serpent? If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask Him! (Matthew 7:7-11)”

That says very plainly that God doesn't want his children to suffer, and it says he can and will ease suffering. I see no conditions or requirements to be met, other than simply asking. So why doesn't God keep this promise?

I was often told that the reason God could not/would not heal me was that my faith was lacking (#3). Observe the mustard seed, how infinitesimal it is. I had at least that much faith. Christ said that was all I needed.

Yeah, well....that and a dollar or two can get you a cup of coffee.

I understand not taking certain medicines if to do so puts one at risk for dependency on them. But I don't understand it if one is refusing them simply because they are, in and of themselves, sinful.

If to take them means she will resume an addiciton, that's a good reason not to take them. But if she refuses them because God said it was a sin, then God better get on the stick and heal her himself, or else shut up about sin and let her have the medication. Otherwise, your god is torturing you. Deliberately.

I have great empathy for anyone's suffering. I've done more than my share of it. I'm sorry Kathy hurts. I also understand what it's like to have everything seem to work against you. "I can't take pain pills, because I used to be an addict, and I can't risk re-addiction." I get that; it's a real concern. There are operations that can cut certain nerves and ease pain, but they don't always work, and they're pricey, too. Or she can get the vertebra fused, but maybe she can't afford that: another obstacle she can't help. Maybe she needs to risk the addiction and take the pain pills while under a closely managed system of care? Again, that may not be possible, or affordable.

But the bible says that God can fix all of this.

And I can only ask: if he exists, then why hasn't he?

Hi slingblade, first what you say in your post does not sound cruel at all. To your first four points: I think my response to Genesius answers 1 & 2 to a simple and basic level. I hope you don’t mind if I don’t elaborate further at this time.

Number three of your points is very valid and a real possibility to me, and ties into my belief that Jesus allows a lot of suffering in people’s lives to make changes in them that make a difference for eternity.

I certainly acknowledge that a lot of people believe point number four that you list. And although I am in disagreement with that conclusion, I do respect anyone else who has that conclusion. I know very many nice, loving and generous people who believe that way.

I am also very adamant that lacking faith has nothing to do with not getting healing. I am very angry with so called Christians who say that to people. I do not believe the Bible teaches that in any way when all passages about our faith are viewed together in the correct contex. In my opinion, faith is not a force, that when we correctly learn to manipulate it, that we can use to get Jesus to do anything because of it. Faith is only believing in things unseen and demonstrates our hope in things to come. I believe what Jesus is talking about in the parable of the mustard seed, is that he is saying that any amount of real faith, even the tiniest amount, when it lines up with God’s will, can accomplish great things through him, but only through him. It has nothing to do with us or our power.

Kathy and I do not think any medication or taking of medication is in any way sinful unless a person is abusing them. God did not say the field of medicine or using medication was sin as far a I can see. I believe the Lord chooses to use doctors, surgery and medications for helping and healing people most of the time. I don’t think it is my place to go into the details of why Kathy wants to avoid certain types of medication. I will have to let Kathy go into that if she chooses. We are looking into the things you mention in your last paragraph. Kathy has not made a decision yet though.

Doubt (questioning) has gotten me a direct answer from CD. Thank-you CD for your direct response.

So you two know each other. Hmmm.

1984, quite a few details of how we know each other are found here.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1342860#post1342860

I hope my response is adequate enough for now.
 
Kathy has prayed for healing. The Lord has chosen not to answer her prayer on that at this time, or the answer is no.

I believe, and I think Kathy is pretty close to the same belief, that all the teachings about having what we pray for, like when we are told that we do not have because we do not ask, and other similar teachings in scripture, like the one you have quoted, it is because it does not line up with the Lord’s will. I believe it is only when our will lines up with the Lord’s will that the prayer is answered in the positive. I believe the Lord answers every prayer, it is just most get answered with a no because what we are asking for is not best for us or the person we are praying for.

I don’t think it means Jesus has broken any promises to us. One of the main and basic principles of hermeneutics is that scripture interprets scripture. So you have to look at all the teachings on a certain subject in scripture and view them in context as a whole.

Here is a basic view of my stance and opinion on this; it is that when viewing all teachings on this together, you come to the conclusion that it is only when our wants line up with God’s will that we get an answer that is a yes. It is that most of the time what we ask for is not what is best for us, or it is not in alignment with what Jesus is trying to do in our lives, or the in people’s lives that we might be praying for. I said something like this in another thread and a lot of people found it outlandish, and stated they didn't want any part of a God that would do what I am about to suggest. The Lord uses pain, suffering, heartache and things as such, to reach out to, to teach, to change and to bring back his children to him. It is to get us to respond to him and look his direction because he is concerned about our eternity way more than our lives here on Earth. That is only my opinion and I know many people very adamantly disagree.
Hi Dude,
Thanks for the response. I guess this sums up pretty neatly what I have against religious belief in general. When Jesus said " If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it." , that doesn't seem to need a whole lot of interpretation. But since you believe in Jesus as your savior you can't say "Wait a minute - Jesus said he'd give us whatever we pray for in his name and he didn't back it up. What a gyp!" so you have to make excuses. He didn't say "If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it if I feel like it." or "I will do it if you've been good all year" (Sorry, still a little Xmas hanging around) :D. He said "You ask in my name, I'll do it."

Just out of curiosity, can you conceive of anything that could make you question your faith? I mean, anything short of the clouds parting, a shaft of light coming down, and a booming voice saying "Dude, you've got it all wrong!"?

This may come across as incredibly arrogant, but if God really wants all his children saved, why is he going about it so stupidly? He could do it without taking away anybody's free will and it wouldn't even take a new miracle, just a rehash of one he's done before. Just stop the sun & moon for a day, appear in the clouds in front of a TV camera and say "Hi, God here. Straighten up or you'll be sorry!" One little miracle and he could convert more people than all the missionaries in history. Free will stays, because the hard-core skeptics could still deny it was supernatural. But no, as Judas so eloquently sang in "Jesus Christ, Superstar":

Every time I look at you I don't understand
Why you let the things you did get so out of hand.
You'd have managed better if you'd had it planned.
Why'd you choose such a backward time in such a strange land?
If you'd come today you could have reached a whole nation.
Israel in 4 BC had no mass communication.
So that's it, Dude. All you need to do is unscrew the inscrutable mind of God and lay some answers on us. Aaaaaaaaaand. . . . Go!

:teacher:
 
Kathy has prayed for healing. The Lord has chosen not to answer her prayer on that at this time, or the answer is no.
And what evidence do you have that drives that conclusion?

I don’t think it means Jesus has broken any promises to us.
Again: evidence? What distinguishes your hypotheses from all others?

One of the main and basic principles of hermeneutics is that scripture interprets scripture. So you have to look at all the teachings on a certain subject in scripture and view them in context as a whole.
How does one deal with the clear and direct contradictions within scripture? If one wants to eschew the need for any outside evidence, one needs to have a closed, self-consistent system. Please indicate a decisive manner to decide between two contradictory scriptural passages.

Here is a basic view of my stance and opinion on this; it is that when viewing all teachings on this together, you come to the conclusion that it is only when our wants line up with God’s will that we get an answer that is a yes.
How does this definition distinguish itself from any other postdictive magical thinking?

I hope my response is adequate enough for now.
Frankly, no; you've not yet written a thing for any rational mind to digest. I'm hoping my questions help you write at least with expository clarity, if not a smattering of rational thinking.
 
Last edited:
Actually no one can convert anyone...this is the work of the Holy Sprit in peoples lives.

So why are you here? Why do you keep going on and on, if not to try to convert us?

If we are not converted, then apparently the Holy Spirit hasn't worked in our lives (yet?). Given that, how can we be blamed if we aren't converted?

You have admitted that it took the Holy Spirit to convert you. Why would you expect anything else from us?

If you want us to convert, it seems that you should be praying the Holy Spirit to convert us instead of wasting your time preaching. As you admit, your preaching does no good without the Holy Spirit.
 
I believe, and I think Kathy is pretty close to the same belief, that all the teachings about having what we pray for, like when we are told that we do not have because we do not ask, and other similar teachings in scripture, like the one you have quoted, it is because it does not line up with the Lord’s will. I believe it is only when our will lines up with the Lord’s will that the prayer is answered in the positive. I believe the Lord answers every prayer, it is just most get answered with a no because what we are asking for is not best for us or the person we are praying for.

I don’t think it means Jesus has broken any promises to us. One of the main and basic principles of hermeneutics is that scripture interprets scripture. So you have to look at all the teachings on a certain subject in scripture and view them in context as a whole.

Other posters have already asked why Jesus said "Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them" (mark 11:24) when He clearly meant "Whatever things you desire that are also God's desire," but I have a couple of related questions. If the request also has to be God's will, then why is a request necessary at all? Surely you are not saying that if it is God's will to move a mountain into the sea (Mark 11:23 "For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith.") then God can't or won't move the mountain until someone asks. Why is the request necessary?

Also, outside of Jesus cursing the fig tree (which is pretty strange to begin with) when would it ever be God's will to wither a fig tree or to move a mountain into the sea. I ask because Jesus gives those two examples of asking for something and then receiving it. You say that you will receive it only if it is in God's plan, so when will it ever be God's plan to wither a tree or send a mountain to the bottom of the ocean? If the answer is never, then why did He give those specific examples?
 
So why are you here? Why do you keep going on and on, if not to try to convert us?

If we are not converted, then apparently the Holy Spirit hasn't worked in our lives (yet?). Given that, how can we be blamed if we aren't converted?

You have admitted that it took the Holy Spirit to convert you. Why would you expect anything else from us?

If you want us to convert, it seems that you should be praying the Holy Spirit to convert us instead of wasting your time preaching. As you admit, your preaching does no good without the Holy Spirit.

Actually, if Kathy were led of the Holy Spirit, wouldn't you think the first thing that would have happened is that other Christians would have rallied to her side?

Instead, she wound up pissing THEM off, too.
 
The Lord uses pain, suffering, heartache and things as such, to reach out to, to teach, to change and to bring back his children to him. It is to get us to respond to him and look his direction because he is concerned about our eternity way more than our lives here on Earth. That is only my opinion and I know many people very adamantly disagree.

Well, yeah.

Do you understand at all why we might disagree?

This was one of the major reasons I began questioning and eventually left my life in the Baptist church behind. Basically, you're saying that sometimes when he wants to teach us a lesson, this "superior" entity pulls out the old cat o' nine tails and starts flogging us mercilessly. All the time he's doing this, he tells us that he just wants us to change our ways and show more faith and respect for him. But even if we do change and literally get down on our knees and beg him for forgiveness, he will as often as not, keep flogging away indefinitely.

Would you treat your children this way?

Would you even treat an animal this way?
 
Well, yeah.

Do you understand at all why we might disagree?

This was one of the major reasons I began questioning and eventually left my life in the Baptist church behind. Basically, you're saying that sometimes when he wants to teach us a lesson, this "superior" entity pulls out the old cat o' nine tails and starts flogging us mercilessly. All the time he's doing this, he tells us that he just wants us to change our ways and show more faith and respect for him. But even if we do change and literally get down on our knees and beg him for forgiveness, he will as often as not, keep flogging away indefinitely.

Would you treat your children this way?

Would you even treat an animal this way?
Excellent post, KillerBob.

I'm sure the happy God-fearing people will have an answer for you, something like "it is not for us to judge," etc etc.

In other words, shut up and enjoy jesus, won't you?
 
This was one of the major reasons I began questioning and eventually left my life in the Baptist church behind. Basically, you're saying that sometimes when he wants to teach us a lesson, this "superior" entity pulls out the old cat o' nine tails and starts flogging us mercilessly. All the time he's doing this, he tells us that he just wants us to change our ways and show more faith and respect for him. But even if we do change and literally get down on our knees and beg him for forgiveness, he will as often as not, keep flogging away indefinitely.

The floggings will continue until morale, (faith), improves!
 
That worked so well for the millions of faithful during the Crusades and Black Death. The deeper their faith, the more died. Yeah, that sounds like good reasoning...

It wasn't until sane people started instituting sane laws and rules that the Black Death abated. No faith involved.

Obviously, the superior entity is sadistic, masochistic, and evil. Keep up that faith in it...
 
Excellent post, KillerBob.

I'm sure the happy God-fearing people will have an answer for you, something like "it is not for us to judge," etc etc.

In other words, shut up and enjoy jesus, won't you?

Thanks.

Now that I've thought about it a little, I really like the animal angle of that analogy. I’ve known people who will train a dog by hitting, beating, and scaring them anytime they do something wrong. Sure, they might end up eventually getting the dog to behave in the way they want them to, but for the dog it’s behavior purely motivated by fear, not affection or true respect.

I’m always baffled why anyone would do this when we know that the approach of thorough and consistent training without the beatings will get the dog to exhibit the desired behavior much more consistently and the dog will be more likely to behave correctly even when the master’s not watching. And maybe most importantly, the dog will usually be much more loving, since the respect isn’t based on fear.

I believe that beating the dog into submission is most often based on laziness by someone who finds it easier to be harshly reactive instead of consistently proactive. As justification for the beatings, the master might occasionally tell everyone that they really love the dog and the dog just doesn’t understand that the beatings are actually beneficial. But that doesn’t really cut it if we know there are better ways to handle it and anyone who accepts this line of reasoning is just as guilty as the master in my book.



One objection might be that God doesn’t give the beatings, Satan does. But to me that sounds even worse.

That’s just the master saying that they “love” the dog too much to beat them personally, but they’re still too lazy to proactively teach the dog. So instead, whenever the dog misbehaves, the master is willing to let their sadistic next door neighbor have a go at the dog. All the while, the master tries to convince the dog that he can receive long term protection from the neighbor if he’s only willing to show the desired behavior.

Unfortunately, even if the dog behaves correctly 100% of the time, this master is still more than willing to let the neighbor regularly harass the dog and may even let the neighbor give a few frivolous beatings now and then for no good reason.

But it’s all for the good of the dog and it only seems harsh because the dog isn’t intelligent enough to understand the long term goal or the true depth of the master’s love, right? Right?
 
I’m always baffled why anyone would do this when we know that the approach of thorough and consistent training without the beatings will get the dog to exhibit the desired behavior much more consistently and the dog will be more likely to behave correctly even when the master’s not watching. And maybe most importantly, the dog will usually be much more loving, since the respect isn’t based on fear.
<snip>
One objection might be that God doesn’t give the beatings, Satan does. But to me that sounds even worse.

That’s just the master saying that they “love” the dog too much to beat them personally, but they’re still too lazy to proactively teach the dog. So instead, whenever the dog misbehaves, the master is willing to let their sadistic next door neighbor have a go at the dog. All the while, the master tries to convince the dog that he can receive long term protection from the neighbor if he’s only willing to show the desired behavior.

I love your analogy KillerBob - it's very apt. As a amature dog trainer, I've often thought about it similiarly. Back 30 years ago, when we didn't know better, dog training was largely done through corrective/coercive measures. It might have produced an obedient dog but certainly not a happy one. Now adays, dog training is done using positive reinforcements because it gets much better results and doesn't break the spirit of the animal. You'd think if us dumb humans could figure that out that god could too!
 
You'd think if us dumb humans could figure that out that god could too!

A god could easily figure that out, but obviously not the humans who create gods.


I shouldn't feel guilty considering that KK's opening post didn't even follow her own topic, but....this pagan celebrated xmas with my wife and two year old, giving each other gifts and munching on a huge turkey.

It was thoroughly enjoyable and completely guilt-free, despite my having a "wicked, black heart" and any other crap that this alleged god has undeservedly given to me!
 
One last post for Christian Dude and kurious_kathy...

Here are your own forum's rules:


The usual forum rules like no spamming, swearing, personal attacks, threats, trolling, flaming, illegal talk, etc apply.

Post in the correct forum and don't post the same thing multiple times

Do not be purposely annoying

Keep all disagreements private, via email or PM, this includes disagreements with staff and management

No using the boards to promote personal crusades or preoccupations. We're not here to help you pursue specific agendas or win any converts. Single-issue preaching is not allowed.

Please post images as links

No suggestive images or discussions

No impersonating mods, administrators, or other users

Only one account per person, please

"Goodbye" topics will be removed

Insults, name-calling, and condescending attitudes are not allowed. Similarly, thinly veiled insults, name-calling, and condescension will also not be tolerated.

Outside of the Music Shops, the Buy/Sell/Trade Forum, and products of your own (such as music or t-shirts) that you are selling, please do not use Firestream for solicitation. Basically: pyramid scams, "free widget" internet schemes, Amway or Ponzi or similar frauds, and the like, are all not welcome here. If you're curious as to why they're all scams, go read this.



Emphasis mine.

It seems we would be banned for doing exactly what you have done here.

Do you now see how this might offend us? Do you now understand how you ignoring your own rules because we aren't worthy of them is condescending and offensive?
 
Kathy, since neither you nor Christian Dude have bothered stopping by the "Faithlessness" thread to answer questions, allow me to copy one here:



So what's your answer, Kathy? How can an omnibenevolent God show less mercy towards his creations than a flawed and weak human?
It's because of God's mercy that Jesus came. He's the only one that never sinned. God is Holy...we are not. Only those of us who receive what Jesus did on the cross can be reconciled to God. It's God reconciling us back to himself that matters.
 
It's because of God's mercy that Jesus came. He's the only one that never sinned. God is Holy...we are not. Only those of us who receive what Jesus did on the cross can be reconciled to God. It's God reconciling us back to himself that matters.


More preaching? Interesting. Didn't you say that you chose #3?

In case you forgot what that was, I'll quote:

3) Acknowledge that your worldview is different, and leave this preaching behind. Sine you probably won't apologise for being offensive, you could just ignore that you ever acted this way and then begin to interact with us in a rational and positive fashion.


So this would be the third time you have shown yourself a liar. The timestamp on the post in this thread is AFTER the post I just linked to.

You are here to preach. nothing else.

Move along troll.
 

Back
Top Bottom