Has Pdoh gone stark raving sane?

Gravy · Feb 4, 2007

NickUK said:
My normal sig is one of AceyBake's classic lines - dunno why I keep getting the other one. Are the NWO trying to tell me something?

It's a software error. Go to "edit signature" and save your old one. It will reappear.

Firestone · Feb 4, 2007

kookbreaker said:
He also seems to have removed the posts conspiracysmasher that had his little game playing. He's a thorough little liar, ain't he?

Incredible! He did it just now, it was still there earlier today.

Anyway, it's still in the Google cache, and I saved that one for posterity.

H'ethetheth · Feb 4, 2007

Someone started a thread just now for PDoherty to explain why he's a liar.

Amusing.

Gravy · Feb 4, 2007

Well, he couldn't delete the responses to his announcement:

Conspiracy Smasher 12/22/06

Ronald Wieck said...
Are you teasing us, Pd?

Ronald Wieck said...
Well, Pd, if you are serious, congratulations are in order. Maybe I'm taking a rosier view of life these days, but I've long had a suspicion that you were here to be persuaded. Still, closed minds can't be changed, so you deserve a great deal of credit.

The Artistic Macrophage said...
As for PD, while your history on the other side of the fence is long and at times hard to take, I too will accept your return to sanity with welcome arms, and hope you remain this way.

JAStewart said...
I believe and congratulate PD.

I was once a denier and now I'm a debunker too: electionnightspecial.blogspot.com

Anonymous said...
are you guys(jaste and pod) so weak-minded that you can be on both sides of an issue as important as 9/11? i have a feeling the congratulaters here would not be acting quite the same if it were debunkers becoming skeptics.

The Artistic Macrophage said...
Strangely enough, in the time I have been debating 9/11, I have yet to see one single skeptic (we call ourselves skeptics, not the truthers) from JREF or any of the other blogs convert to a 9/11 denier/truther...not one single person.

docker said...
Phod, spare me your change of heart ********. the only reason you are here is becuase you have been banned, yet again from JREF.

You are a troll, a loser and a lover boy.
We can read you dough ball and we can see exactly what you are up to.

docker said...
Tell you what PD , start a new thread on LC forum. tell your pals there how you are a new debunker.

have you got any balls? PD

somebody said...
Hey lover boy how is your revelation going down with the LC boys?

Have they banned you yet?

docker said...
I thought you was one of us lot now PD, or are you lying again ?

The Artistic Macrophage said...
PD:

I noticed you still find us at JREF reprehensible. That is your opinion, and you are entitled to it, but could you enlighten me, now that you have, as you put it, "seen th elight", why you find us so?

CHF said...
PD,

I'm not sure what to make of your alleged defection.

You did show signs of improvement at times (like when you admitted 'Al Qaeda did it') but then you'd follow it up with something so absurd ('Al Qaeda might have planted the demolition charges') that it just didn't seem like you were all there mentally.

I guess the reason I doubt you is that I simply refuse to believe that someone with the education you claim to have could possibly be suckered in by twoofer ******** - even for a while.

The twoofers shouldn't fool ANYONE with common sense for even a split second, let alone fool you to the point of arguing nonsense for months on end.

The Artistic Macrophage said...
Perhaps he never will change, and will always be a hate filled, ill tempered man, but how is ever going to have a chance to change, if we do not give him that chance. Listen, he has slagged me more than almost any debunker (maybe Gravy was slagged more), so if I am willing to at least watch and observe his behavior for change, I think others should to.

maccy · Feb 4, 2007

chippy said:
Hey, check this out!

http://www.last.fm/user/PDoherty/

He keeps claiming that he's 30, yet here's a guy with Pdoherty as his username and is 16. He said earlier that he was 15, and that was a while ago, so he probably had his birthday already.

Pdoh is a complete, utter liar who needs to be exposed as one. This guy cannot continue to dominate the Loose Change Forums with such complete, utter dishonesty.

Edit: looks like I used "complete, utter" twice...haha oops!

That kid has a picture of Pete Doherty as his avatar - I think it's more likely that he has that username because he is a fan.

I award you five Conspiracy Fantasist "Jumping to the Wrong Conclusion" Points.

Mancman · Feb 4, 2007

I wonder if this is him: Fun Loving Friendly Male in Manchester.

(NSFW, btw)

Cl1mh4224rd · Feb 4, 2007

Gravy said:
Well, he couldn't delete the responses to his announcement:

I assume this is the original (I hadn't seen it, so had to track it down): http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/2006/12/merry-christmas.html

I find it downright hilarious that he would go back and delete his comments related to his "conversion" and then claim they never happened. As if all the "This post has been removed by the author" messages sprinkled among "Hey, congrats, PDoh," and "Credit to you, Pdoh" wouldn't be a dead giveaway...

Ahh... a shining member of the "truth" movement (I'm not even capitalizing it anymore), ladies and gentlemen.

maccy · Feb 4, 2007

Cl1mh4224rd said:
I assume this is the original (I hadn't seen it, so had to track it down): http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/2006/12/merry-christmas.html

I find it downright hilarious that he would go back and delete his comments related to his "conversion" and then claim they never happened. As if all the "This post has been removed by the author" messages sprinkled among "Hey, congrats, PDoh," and "Credit to you, Pdoh" wouldn't be a dead giveaway...

Ahh... a shining member of the "truth" movement (I'm not even capitalizing it anymore), ladies and gentlemen.

It's still in the google cache:

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cach...her.blogspot.com/2006/12/merry-christmas.html

So, here's a copy before it disappears:

I've pasted all the comments - except for the porn spam at the end.

Cl1mh4224rd · Feb 4, 2007

maccy said:
It's still in the google cache:

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cach...her.blogspot.com/2006/12/merry-christmas.html

lol! Awesome... I hope someone posts that in the thread over at LCF.

stateofgrace · Feb 4, 2007

Cl1mh4224rd said:
I assume this is the original (I hadn't seen it, so had to track it down): http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/2006/12/merry-christmas.html

I find it downright hilarious that he would go back and delete his comments related to his "conversion" and then claim they never happened. As if all the "This post has been removed by the author" messages sprinkled among "Hey, congrats, PDoh," and "Credit to you, Pdoh" wouldn't be a dead giveaway...

Ahh... a shining member of the "truth" movement (I'm not even capitalizing it anymore), ladies and gentlemen.

I remember posting in that thread and I remember clearly what PD said after he accused me of being docker. I am not this guy and have no idea who he is but for some reason PD thought I was him.

Strange guy. (PD that is).

maccy · Feb 4, 2007

Mancman said:
I wonder if this is him: Fun Loving Friendly Male in Manchester.

(NSFW, btw)

Also not especially safe for work:

http://www.measurection.com/fusionbb/showtopic.php?tid/248539/post/258836/#258836
http://penis.freeadultboards.com/pr...um=penis&sid=8af13eca776042fc1c4844d7bb0900c5

eddyk · Feb 4, 2007

How Mean...search me

eddyk
eddyk2
eddyk3
eddykola
Eddy Kimber
Edward Kimber

maccy · Feb 4, 2007

Cl1mh4224rd said:
lol! Awesome... I hope someone posts that in the thread over at LCF.

Also in the cache, page one of PDoherty's "I No Longer Believe" thread:

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cach...m/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=1804

again for posterity:

LashL · Feb 4, 2007

maccy said:
Also in the cache, page one of PDoherty's "I No Longer Believe" thread:

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cach...m/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=1804

again for posterity:

I No Longer Believe
Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:02 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

Im afraid I no longer believe in the conspiracy theories.

I have always only believed in the CD side of things and you will have noticed I debunked killtown on several occasions.

I now only believe that the government ignored warnings. They were not involved. Its absurd.

I am not going to become one of the awful trolls that insult the people here. I know that you believe what you believe in sincerity but I can no longer believe it myself.

Hope this is understood and taken in the spirit it is given.

Top
eddykola
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:06 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Member No.: 336
Joined: 20-October 06

This may sound weird.

But my mate excitedly sent these words in an MSN message to me around 20min ago I think.

One of the bigger CT names

Word to the unwise (jk), if you don't want to be converted, don't visit JREF.

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:07 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE (eddykola @ Dec 24 2006, 01:06 AM)
This may sound weird.

But my mate excitedly sent these words in an MSN message to me around 20min ago I think.

One of the bigger CT names

What?

Top
eddykola
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:08 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Member No.: 336
Joined: 20-October 06

We like to talk about the truth movement from time to time, see whats up.

Top
evilhomer
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:26 AM

Newbie

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Member No.: 1,274
Joined: 24-December 06

QUOTE (eddykola @ Dec 24 2006, 01:06 AM)
Word to the unwise (jk), if you don't want to be converted, don't visit JREF.

But shouldn't we demand to be converted?

If we are true conspiracy theorists we should be open to both sides. Just hiding away here listening to one side of the argument if far from seeking the truth.

If we don't look at both sides, we'll never know if we're wrong.

Top
Killtown
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:26 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Member No.: 35
Joined: 18-October 06

QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:02 AM)
and you will have noticed I debunked killtown on several occasions.

:blink: :blink: :blink:

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:34 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE (Killtown @ Dec 24 2006, 01:26 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:02 AM)
and you will have noticed I debunked killtown on several occasions.

:blink: :blink: :blink:

Killtown I respect a lot of your research. I have no wish to argue with you. But I have debunked you on several occasions and you know it.

Top
Killtown
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:35 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Member No.: 35
Joined: 18-October 06

QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:34 AM)
Killtown I respect a lot of your research. I have no wish to argue with you. But I have debunked you on several occasions and you know it.

Refresh my memory.

And btw, you think a 75 ton 757 w/ 5,500 gal of jetfuel went down a small hole in Shanksville without burning the grass outside the crater?

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:37 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE (Killtown @ Dec 24 2006, 01:35 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:34 AM)
Killtown I respect a lot of your research. I have no wish to argue with you. But I have debunked you on several occasions and you know it.

Refresh my memory.

And btw, you think a 75 ton 757 w/ 5,500 gal of jetfuel went down a small hole in Shanksville without burning the grass outside the crater?

Killtown i debunked your sandia psyops nonsense and I also totally destroyed you in the "warm knives through butter" thread.

Top
Reggie_perrin
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:39 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,088
Member No.: 6
Joined: 18-October 06

why the sudden change Pdoherty ?

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:40 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Dec 24 2006, 01:39 AM)
why the sudden change Pdoherty ?

Reggie it aint sudden really. I realised over a period that i was arguing with the rational part of me not just jrefers.

Thats why my activity here declined.

Top
Killtown
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:41 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Member No.: 35
Joined: 18-October 06

QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:37 AM)
1) Killtown i debunked your sandia psyops nonsense

2) and I also totally destroyed you in the "warm knives through butter" thread.

1) Missed that one, but what does that have to do with 9/11 even if you did?

2) :lol: :lol: :lol: So let's say you did, most truthers don't believe in NPT (you insulted me all the time over it), so that's a moot point huh?

Btw, care to explain Shanksville?

Top
Killtown
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:42 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Member No.: 35
Joined: 18-October 06

"In my opinion WTC7 was with the utmost probability brought down by controlled demolition done by experts" - Hugo Bachmann, Professor emeritus for structural analysis and construction at ETH

Top
SNAKE_PLISKEN
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:43 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Member No.: 917
Joined: 12-November 06

QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:02 AM)
Im afraid I no longer believe in the conspiracy theories.

I have always only believed in the CD side of things and you will have noticed I debunked killtown on several occasions.

I now only believe that the government ignored warnings. They were not involved. Its absurd.

I am not going to become one of the awful trolls that insult the people here. I know that you believe what you believe in sincerity but I can no longer believe it myself.

Hope this is understood and taken in the spirit it is given.

so you now think wtc 1 2 7 were not demolitions?

Top
Reggie_perrin
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:44 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,088
Member No.: 6
Joined: 18-October 06

QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:40 AM)
QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Dec 24 2006, 01:39 AM)
why the sudden change Pdoherty ?

Reggie it aint sudden really. I realised over a period that i was arguing with the rational part of me not just jrefers.

Thats why my activity here declined.

so you don't think wtc7 was a con/dem anymore ?

I have to say for me the ISI connections with regard the wiring of money isnt just an absurd conspiricy theory, they had to have known about this in the US intellegence agencies.

Everyone can change there minds though, ive no problems with that.

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:45 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE (Killtown @ Dec 24 2006, 01:41 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:37 AM)
1) Killtown i debunked your sandia psyops nonsense

2) and I also totally destroyed you in the "warm knives through butter" thread.

1) Missed that one, but what does that have to do with 9/11 even if you did?

2) :lol: :lol: :lol: So let's say you did, most truthers don't believe in NPT (you insulted me all the time over it), so that's a moot point huh?

Btw, care to explain Shanksville?

Killtown i am yet to see a single piece of evidence that calls the shanksville crash into question. I have always believed a plane crashed there

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:46 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Dec 24 2006, 01:44 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:40 AM)
QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Dec 24 2006, 01:39 AM)
why the sudden change Pdoherty ?

Reggie it aint sudden really. I realised over a period that i was arguing with the rational part of me not just jrefers.

Thats why my activity here declined.

so you don't think wtc7 was a con/dem anymore ?

I have to say for me the ISI connections with regard the wiring of money isnt just an absurd conspiricy theory, they had to have known about this in the US intellegence agencies.

Everyone can change there minds though, ive no problems with that.

Reggie they had no motive for 7

Top
Reggie_perrin
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:48 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,088
Member No.: 6
Joined: 18-October 06

QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:46 AM)
QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Dec 24 2006, 01:44 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:40 AM)
QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Dec 24 2006, 01:39 AM)
why the sudden change Pdoherty ?

Reggie it aint sudden really. I realised over a period that i was arguing with the rational part of me not just jrefers.

Thats why my activity here declined.

so you don't think wtc7 was a con/dem anymore ?

I have to say for me the ISI connections with regard the wiring of money isnt just an absurd conspiricy theory, they had to have known about this in the US intellegence agencies.

Everyone can change there minds though, ive no problems with that.

Reggie they had no motive for 7

Has a JFER hacked into your computer or something ? :blink:

Top
Killtown
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:48 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Member No.: 35
Joined: 18-October 06

QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:45 AM)
Killtown i am yet to see a single piece of evidence that calls the shanksville crash into question. I have always believed a plane crashed there

Want a single piece of evidence? Ok, what happened to the vertical tail after it only left a impression in the grass, but didn't penetrate the "soft soil"?

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:53 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Dec 24 2006, 01:48 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:46 AM)
QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Dec 24 2006, 01:44 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:40 AM)
QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Dec 24 2006, 01:39 AM)
why the sudden change Pdoherty ?

Reggie it aint sudden really. I realised over a period that i was arguing with the rational part of me not just jrefers.

Thats why my activity here declined.

so you don't think wtc7 was a con/dem anymore ?

I have to say for me the ISI connections with regard the wiring of money isnt just an absurd conspiricy theory, they had to have known about this in the US intellegence agencies.

Everyone can change there minds though, ive no problems with that.

Reggie they had no motive for 7

Has a JFER hacked into your computer or something ? :blink:

Its true man. Take a step back and look at how absurd the idea is.

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:55 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE (Killtown @ Dec 24 2006, 01:48 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:45 AM)
Killtown i am yet to see a single piece of evidence that calls the shanksville crash into question. I have always believed a plane crashed there

Want a single piece of evidence? Ok, what happened to the vertical tail after it only left a impression in the grass, but didn't penetrate the "soft soil"?

Killtown when will you learn that questions are not evidence.

Your incredulity regarding the tail is not evidence. Things happen when planes hit the ground at 500 miles an hour that you dont expect

Top
Killtown
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 01:58 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Member No.: 35
Joined: 18-October 06

QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:55 AM)
Killtown when will you learn that questions are not evidence.

Your incredulity regarding the tail is not evidence. Things happen when planes hit the ground at 500 miles an hour that you dont expect

Yep, you sound like true JREFer.

Ok, to make it so you can understand, there is a faint impression in the grass of a vertical tail, but no penetration of the "soft soil". A 757's could not leave a soft impression like that and then disappear.

Proof no 757 hit there.

I you still disagree, then explain what happened to the tail without the vague JREF "every crash is not alike" shpeal.

Top
NickJ1234
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 02:04 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 106
Member No.: 18
Joined: 18-October 06

QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:46 AM)

Reggie they had no motive for 7

And you know this how?

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 02:04 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE (Killtown @ Dec 24 2006, 01:58 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:55 AM)
Killtown when will you learn that questions are not evidence.

Your incredulity regarding the tail is not evidence. Things happen when planes hit the ground at 500 miles an hour that you dont expect

Yep, you sound like true JREFer.

Ok, to make it so you can understand, there is a faint impression in the grass of a vertical tail, but no penetration of the "soft soil". A 757's could not leave a soft impression like that and then disappear.

Proof no 757 hit there.

I you still disagree, then explain what happened to the tail without the vague JREF "every crash is not alike" shpeal.

Killtown evidence would be you showing me where the tail really is or showing me several other identical crashes with the tail still there.

Think what you are saying... Would you convict someone in a court and send them to0 prison because you think the tail should be there?

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 02:05 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE (NickJ1234 @ Dec 24 2006, 02:04 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:46 AM)

Reggie they had no motive for 7

And you know this how?

Whats the motive?

Top
Killtown
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 02:09 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Member No.: 35
Joined: 18-October 06

QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 02:04 AM)
Killtown evidence would be you showing me where the tail really is or showing me several other identical crashes with the tail still there.

Think what you are saying... Would you convict someone in a court and send them to0 prison because you think the tail should be there?

you think a 757 crashed there, I should you based on physics based on the tail leaving a soft impression but the showing now sign of it proves a 757 didn't crash there.

If you have some logical explaination as to what happened to the tail, I'm all ears.

Then you can explain why no grass outside the crater is burned from the 75ton plane w/ 5,500 gals of fuel crashing there at 580mph.

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 02:09 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE
Yep, you sound like true JREFer.

Killtown i take offence to this. Even though my mind has changed i still think the jrefers are disgusting.

They have been debating whether to reinstate my account but i would never go back there.

I will continue to argue fairly on here and if i see jrefers strawmanning ill still pull them on it

Top
pdoherty76
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 02:11 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,757
Member No.: 543
Joined: 23-October 06

QUOTE (Killtown @ Dec 24 2006, 02:09 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 02:04 AM)
Killtown evidence would be you showing me where the tail really is or showing me several other identical crashes with the tail still there.

Think what you are saying... Would you convict someone in a court and send them to0 prison because you think the tail should be there?

you think a 757 crashed there, I should you based on physics based on the tail leaving a soft impression but the showing now sign of it proves a 757 didn't crash there.

If you have some logical explaination as to what happened to the tail, I'm all ears.

Then you can explain why no grass outside the crater is burned from the 75ton plane w/ 5,500 gals of fuel crashing there at 580mph.

Give me one reason why the tail could not be broken up.

With regard to burnt grass: The fuel in the plane was also travelling 580 mph and it was travelling partly toward the forest. You might have noticed the forest is burnt, or did they fake that aswell

Top
NickJ1234
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 02:11 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 106
Member No.: 18
Joined: 18-October 06

QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 02:05 AM)
QUOTE (NickJ1234 @ Dec 24 2006, 02:04 AM)
QUOTE (pdoherty76 @ Dec 24 2006, 01:46 AM)

Reggie they had no motive for 7

And you know this how?

Whats the motive?

No, YOU made the claim. im asking YOU how you know this

Top
SNAKE_PLISKEN
Posted: Dec 24 2006, 02:12 AM

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Member No.: 917
Joined: 12-November 06

pdoherty76 - do you still believe the towers were a controlled demolition

Oops. Now, how is he going to explain that on the thread at LooseWithTheTruth where he is currently claiming he didn't post any such thing?

:dl:

Firestone · Feb 4, 2007

LashL said:
Oops. Now, how is he going to explain that on the thread at LooseWithTheTruth where he is currently claiming he didn't post any such thing?

He will say that it was ... his little brother !!!

pdoherty76 (or his brother) @LCF said:
My brother must have come on and used my account. Hes such a mischeivious sod. I apologise if he confused you.

LashL, may I borrow your dog?

:dl:

LashL · Feb 4, 2007

Firestone said:
He will say that it was ... his little brother !!!

Ahh, yes, the old "it wasn't me, it was my little brother" ploy. You know, I don't think that even the LooseWithTheTruth boyz will buy that one.

LashL, may I borrow your dog?

Any time! It's not actually mine but JREF's and you can reproduce it any time by typing : dl : without the spaces

VespaGuy · Feb 4, 2007

Over on the DohP thread at LC (http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=3343&st=0), Dylan has jumped in to give his two cents. I can no longer post at the forums, having been banned for simply not believing the 'conspiracy'. It's not worth my time to sign up again just to have my posts deleted and to be banned again.

Here are some of Dylan's words of wisdom in that thread:

Hey, if a 20 year old online RPG buff gets a claim to fame by putting subtitles over someone else's hard work, more power to him.

This, coming from a twenty-something, pot-smoking, film school dropouot who gets a claim to fame by putting a techno soundtrack behind other people's hard work. Glass houses, throwing stones, etc, etc.

The best part is Marky will have to pay $10 to debunk the Final Cut.

They pose no threat whatsoever.

I assume that the $10 Mr. Avery is reffering to is the ticket price of his ever-postponed "final cut".

Don't worry, Dylan, if your movie ever hits the cinemas, Marky and others (who easily tear apart your claims) will be the least of your worries. If Loose Change ever breaks out of the internet-slacker demographic, expect experts who currently can't be bothered with your google video to come out of the woodwork. Right now, your claims can't stand up to the simplest criticism. Wait until professional engineers, demolition experts, and other professionals begin dissecting your ignorance.

I honestly can't wait for the theatrical release of Loose Change: Final Cut. Dylan will be known as a laughing-stock nationwide, instead of just on the internet.

Of course, that's if the movie ever makes it to theaters. If Dylan's past failed promises are any indication, the Final Cut won't ever make it beyond the intenet.

in reponse to this post:
"Dylan, allow me to ask you something: do you think the fact that Mark is 20 and doesn't have a job makes his analysis of Loose Change any less credible?"

Dylan responds:

It certainly makes it more laughable. Along with his terrible attempts at debunking, as proven earlier in this thread.

According to Dylan, being 20 and unemployed makes someone's analysis more laughable. How about being a minimum-wage, 20-something, who can't get into film school? Does that make claims more laughable?

Laughable?
How about Dylan's promise that LC would definately be screened for British Parliment. How about his hypocritical forums that ban anyone who questions the conspiracy. How about the way incriminating posts dissappear at Loose Change. Or Dylan and the Hardly Boys claiming to have found the black boxes at the Smithsonian. Or how the Louder Than Words crew has to keep cleaning up their messes (Bermas' "Firefighters are in on it", Rowe claiming the errors were intentionally left in.)

If anyone knows about being laughable it's Do-Over Dylan.

Oh, no! Some pissed off internet junkie in Minneapolis is going to stand outside theaters and hand out something he printed!

Dylan knows that pamphlets are useless against YouTube and bullhorns.

Go ahead. More people will go in to see it.

Exactly. Who cares whether it's true or not. As long as more people see the film, Dylan is happy. It's not about the money... really.

maccy · Feb 4, 2007

None of them have spotted that they're basing all of this on an interview from 2004.

Also, the Google cache still has another P'Doh gem from a disappeared thread:

The Boy Doherty @LC said:
When will the JREFers show respect in general. A poster at JREF has stolen my photo and put a big L on the forehead and is now using it as an avatar. Do you agree with that?

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cach...e_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=3028&st=90

This is the photo in question:

Courtesy of Framer Dave.

Originally (without the 'L'), this was here:

[SIZE=-1]http://www.flirtbox.co.uk/dating/pdoherty76.html

Until Pdoherty deleted it and claimed it was a fake:

[/SIZE]

P'Doh said:
Dog town how many times do I have to tell you that isnt me. In fact it wouldnt surprise me if you had set that up.

Anyway, the guy in the picture, whoever he is, is still infinitely better looking thab no-tits abby

http://abbyscott.blogspot.com/2006/...ther-age-11-take-two.html#c116488528824552780

Horatius · Feb 4, 2007

maccy said:
This is the photo in question:

What's wrong with acknowledging him as the "Leading" man in the twoofer movement? Or is he thinking the "L" means something else?

Whatever could he be suggesting?

chippy · Feb 5, 2007

Oh, no! Some pissed off internet junkie in Minneapolis is going to stand outside theaters and hand out something he printed!

Oh Dylan. I'm more than just a pissed off internet junkie. You'll regret this.

Has Pdoh gone stark raving sane?

Downsitting Citizen

Proud Award Award recipient

fishy rocket scientist

Downsitting Citizen

Master Poster

Graduate Poster

Philosopher

Master Poster

Philosopher

Unregistered

Master Poster

Thinker

Master Poster

Goddess of Legaltainment™

Proud Award Award recipient

Goddess of Legaltainment™

Graduate Poster

Master Poster

NWO Kitty Wrangler

Muse