'Hardfire' Call-in Reminder

you know he can recieve PM's, as well the fact that he has posted his e-mail in several places? or did you forget that?
 
Ringing a call in show to speak to the self styled master debunker means obsession?


I think some truthers do have an obsession with Mark, yes. Considering how many truthers keep harping on about WTC7, I would think the opportunity to speak to Mr Scheuerman would be hard to pass up. Maybe some did have questions for him - I didn't hear all the program.
 
Told you, it's for Gravy. If he ever has the guts to post in this forum again.

That's low. Implying cowardice about a person who has stated very clearly his reasons for retiring from debating truthers, and who is by his own admission not posting in this sub-forum, and thus unable to defend himself.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=106135




Why don't you try us, JHarrow?
There is a fair bit of collective knowledge.
I'm also curious to know how you know the question has never been asked, considering that you admit to having done no research.


ETA: Wow. This thread popped up several replies in the time it took my to write this post. I'll leave my (somewhat late) reply for posterity, however.
 
Last edited:
The questions relate to something he has published.

Yeah I think JHarrow found a spelling mistake in Mark's work.

If he had a serious question - one that would "knock our socks off" no less - he'd present it.
 
Yeah I think JHarrow found a spelling mistake in Mark's work.

If he had a serious question - one that would "knock our socks off" no less - he'd present it.

Why would I? You are nothing more than his cheerleaders. But even with his peanut gallery to back him up, he was still forced to flee from this forum after being humiliated many times by new posters here. Lets not forget that he had Dr Frank Greening on ignore before he ran away. I bet he had his hands over his ears while he was running too.
 
You are nothing more than his
cheerleaders.

that's a lie . We are not his "cheerleaders". His work stands up, since he has bothered to research, something you've and your ilk has never bothered to do. He compiled all the publicly avaialbe information and provide a resource to access this information.

What we "cheer" him on (if that's how you want to describe it), is for his hard work, and how he has to put up with idiots.



Now, if you have "earth shattering" research to present, or found an error in his work, present it. OR you can contact him through the private messaging feature, his 1000 x published email , or through his website, and like the respected person he is, he does make corrections when ERRORS are pointed out to him.

Why are you such a coward?
 
I caught as much of the show as I could in light of the poor streaming, etc., but I am looking forward to seeing it in its entirety once it is posted online.

Ron, can you post a new thread when it is available (rather than bumping this one which is full of trollish drivel).

Muchas gracias.

(And, people, please don't continue to feed the smelly-footed troll's off topic drivel. Doing so only gives it the undue attention that it craves.)
 
Ringing a call in show to speak to the self styled master debunker means obsession?
For once I agree with you. Obsession would be like a guy who got suspended from a message board, then got banned for making a sock puppet to get around his suspension, then keeps registering with new sock puppets after his old ones get found out.

Don't you agree JHarrow?
 
For once I agree with you. Obsession would be like a guy who got suspended from a message board, then got banned for making a sock puppet to get around his suspension, then keeps registering with new sock puppets after his old ones get found out.

Don't you agree JHarrow?

What are you suggesting? Sounds like you are obsessed with this guy.
 
Where did I say I had new evidence? I said I had good questions for gravy based on some research I had seen.
I back that up, he has never, ever had any evidence, new or old. Just hearsay. Who said no one supports 9/11 truth supporters!
No. I don't want this diluted by the peanut gallery. When I get chance I will put them to Gravy.

Shame he ran away so early in the 911 truth movement.
And this is an example why your research may be lacking some skills in basic comprehension. Funny post; Gravy has done more research than you can understand, as proven post by post by you; the truth movement has failed, it is deep winter, you guys are now exactly like BigFooters looking for scat, and 9/11 truth produces large piles of it.
 
Last edited:
I guess JHarrows' question wasn't about the reincarnation of Ethel Merman, so my next guess is:

Did Willy Rodriguez say he was 200 feet from the tower when it collapsed?

It is a guess based on the new avatar and a feeling that in true truther style he hasn't researched whether or not anyone ever asked Gravy this question.
 
JHarrow, why don't you email your question to Gravy? His email address is listed on his site:

email: nyctours(at)gmail(dot)com

Once you've given him time to reply, you can post your email here and any reply you get.

I'm not sure why you care about this though: unless you can convince the world at large that you are correct about 9/11, nothing will change.

Telling yourself that Gravy has run away isn't going to achieve anything, is it?

 
No. I don't want this diluted by the peanut gallery. When I get chance I will put them to Gravy.

Shame he ran away so early in the 911 truth movement.

Early? When did the attacks occur again? When did the morons start their little fantasy games?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom