'Hardfire' Call-in Reminder

[JHarrow]

Sorry I missed the show, can't wait for it to be on youtube/google video.

Ron have you thought about doing a podcast or even an internet radio show? It would give you a lot more time for a call in show.



Jharrow where is this evidence?

What evidence?

 

[Unsecured Coins]

I call your bluff. you don't have anything.

 

[JHarrow]

I call your bluff. you don't have anything.

Raised.

 

[Magenta]

IIRC Mr. Scheurman did state that the original fire prevention equipment in the towers was inadequate, and that some of the methods of construction seemed more suitable to single story ware houses or stores, but not particularly durable when it came to tall office buildings. (That was what I caught, anyway)

OK, ta. From the little I heard all the callers seemed to direct their questions at Mark. Like they have some strange obsession with him...

 

[Unsecured Coins]

Raised.

I'll see and raise again. post your questions based on your research that you didn't do or drop it.

 

[JHarrow]

OK, ta. From the little I heard all the callers seemed to direct their questions at Mark. Like they have some strange obsession with him...

Ringing a call in show to speak to the self styled master debunker means obsession?

 

[terryfunk4life]

Then fine what is this super question you have?

 

[Drs_Res]

Okay, your questions that no one ever heard before, that will knock our socks off.

 

[CHF]

Are you able to read? I never said I had new information. I said I had good questions he would not have been asked before.

Edited by chillzero: 

Edited for civility

You'd think truthers would want to expose their brilliant questions to as many people as possible....

I guess not!

 

[JHarrow]

Then fine what is this super question you have?

Told you, it's for Gravy. If he ever has the guts to post in this forum again.

 

[terryfunk4life]

His question is about airplane food.

 

[JHarrow]

You'd think truthers would want to expose their brilliant questions to as many people as possible....

I guess not!

No. I don't want this diluted by the peanut gallery. When I get chance I will put them to Gravy.

Shame he ran away so early in the 911 truth movement.

 

[Hokulele]

And the truth movement wonders why no one takes them seriously . . .

 

[OldTigerCub]

Thanks, I did my best. All I wanted was another thirty seconds... and I thought I had it, but I didn't. Well, Mr. Scheuerman has been active elsewhere on the Internet, so perhaps he'll give his opinion later. Time is on our side.

(Mr. Scheuerman is also being called a shill on the Internet. Surprise!)

I thought you got the most important part of your statements in before time ran out. The fact that toofers ignore the intensity of the fires in WTC7, or are just too lazy to research beyond a few frames of video has become painfully apparent.

 

[R.Mackey]

I'm loath to click on all the "View Post" tags to see what's really going on -- but I'm beginning to think that if I did prevent this guy from getting through, I did the world a favor...

Does anyone know how or if the BBC is still involved? I know they were hoping for a real live debate instead of a flaccid forfeit by the Truth Movement leadership, but maybe they got something worthwhile anyway?

 

[A W Smith]

The cowardice of liars

Are you able to read? I never said I had new information. I said I had good questions he would not have been asked before.

Edited by chillzero: 

Edited for civility

So you are reserving your "questions" for a New York City tour guide? And not for the engineers, aircraft technicians, scientists, or builders that post in this forum? Have something to hide coward? Are you afraid your lies Will be revealed? I thought so. You couldn't make the call from Manchester during the show? Or didn't really want to?

 

[Unsecured Coins]

Told you, it's for Gravy

and why is he the only one that can answer this? was it prophesied that only he could answer, lest we suffer pain and forfeiture of the $64,000 question?

 

[JHarrow]

and why is he the only one that can answer this? was it prophesied that only he could answer, lest we suffer pain and forfeiture of the $64,000 question?

The questions relate to something he has published.

 

[Arus808]

Told you, it's for Gravy. If he ever has the guts to post in this forum again.

ahah, that means you have nothing. Why must it be for "gravy" . he gave his reasons why he wont post here anymore (pertaining to 911) He's tired of the *****, like the game you're playing right now.

Why is it for Gravy? We have experts here, that can chime in, so they can answer any question than gRavy can? What are you afraid of?

What is this research? If its on a forum, then link to it, and pose your question.

 

[Arus808]

The questions relate to something he has published.

so post the question. if its a mistake he made, he will be notified and and he can be given time to correct his error. you can contact him through his website, to make the corrections (as he has done many times when errors are made known to him).

why are you acting like a 4 year old?