Haig and his Sun caused earthquakes

Haig said:
Still no valid critique guys...
Click to expand...
That is a lie, Haig: Haig: The many years of ignorance, delusions and lies from a Thunderbolts cultist parroting other Thunderbolts cultists. contains Haig: 14 delusions about the Sun and earthquakes since 4 May 2015
A valid critique is that Ben Davidson is deluded because he (like Haig) is a follower of the Thunderbolts cult.
A valid critique is the insanity of "science" by YouTube video.
A valid critique is the idiocy of citing an article about the electric signals probably given off by rock under stress being used to predict earthquakes. An article that does not mention the Sun at all :eek:
etc.

Guys, Haig has me on ignore so feel free to quote me.
 
Last edited:
Haig said:
Still no valid critique guys but don't hold back too long as there are signs mainstream is catching on a little in that "some scientists think that Earth’s crust may give hints before it ruptures, in the form of electromagnetic anomalies in the ground and atmosphere that occur minutes to days before an earthquake" :cool:



Can electric signals in Earth’s atmosphere predict earthquakes?[/B]
Click to expand...


My ISP went down while I was replying and in the meantime others identified the flaws and fallacies in Haig's post. But here it is for drill:

ferd said:
No mention whatsoever in the article of the sun. And you'll be surprised, I'm sure, to know that the hypothesis being explored by the real scientists is that the electromagnetic phenomena are caused by seismicicity, not vice versa. Spin and obfuscation in 3, 2, 1...
Click to expand...


Sure enough, Haig didn't disappoint.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
ferd burfle said:
My ISP went down while I was replying and in the meantime others identified the flaws and fallacies in Haig's post. But here it is for drill:

ferd said:
No mention whatsoever in the article of the sun. And you'll be surprised, I'm sure, to know that the hypothesis being explored by the real scientists is that the electromagnetic phenomena are caused by seismicicity, not vice versa. Spin and obfuscation in 3, 2, 1...
Click to expand...

Sure enough, Haig didn't disappoint.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


Sure I did't spell it out totally in my post HERE in the Sun - Earth connection to earthquakes but it's there, none the less, if you look into it! ;)

You can start with Evidence for solar wind modulation of lightning and then look into Global electric circuit and lightning and this PDF too Global Electric Circuit Diurnal Variation Derived From Storm Overflight and Satellite Optical Lightning Datasets

After understanding that connect them in Links between solar wind variations, the global electric circuit, and winter cyclone vorticity, and possibly to cold winters in Europe then add that to Mystery of Earthquake Lights Traced to Electrical Charges in Rocks together with Prevalence of Earthquake Lights Associated with Rift Environments

Now after ALL that you should be able to see the link to the Sun in Can electric signals in Earth’s atmosphere predict earthquakes?

I won't worry if you STILL don't get it :D there is lot's more evidence in the pipeline for you to dance around :p
 
jimbob said:
And here is the link proving your theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

As an aside, Haig, why aren't you embedding the youtube videos?
Click to expand...
Saw a deer in my backyard the other day (not the other other day, but the other other other day). Earthquake at 6.

Thanks jimbob, I think that's a good start.

I'm still working on the details of how and why Bacon sandwich eating and deer Sighting (BS for short) trigger the solar events Ben D is so hooked on.

At the same time, I've begun preparation for prime time, i.e. peer-review. I'll be aiming for the world's leading publication (YouTube), and want to make it as scientific as possible (taking a lead from ThunderDolts). To that end, I'll be inviting Alex Parrish to do the presentation (will need to nerdify her somewhat, perhaps glasses?), am looking for top-notch graphics designer (possibly even an internet film-maker), and listening to some music to set the content in scientific context. I thought of writing a vixra paper, but that's such a low-impact publication, and its peer-review inferior to that on YouTube.

Haig, you really must let Ben Davidson know: eating bacon sandwiches and deer sightings trigger the solar events Ben is so hooked on, making the Sun-earthquake connection a mere secondary effect! :eye-poppi
 
Daylightstar said:
Non causa pro causa.

Your message is: if only you wanted to/would believe .....
Click to expand...


It's what this thread is about ;)

No, that's not the message ... belief is not required just recognize the facts and what they mean. :cool:

The evidence keep on coming and being able to predict the timing and location of earthquakes is the goal and there has been some early success. :)

At the center of our solar system there is a magnetic variable star, our sun, that affects the planets, including the Earth understanding that is the key :cool:
 
Haig said:
...
No, that's not the message ...
Click to expand...
You could be right in that not being the message, it sounds more like your message is: "You neeeeed to belieeeeve meeee".

Haig said:
... belief is not required just recognize the facts and what they mean. :cool:
...
Click to expand...
This is where you construct your non causa pro causa, where your belief sets in.

Haig said:
...
At the center of our solar system there is a magnetic variable star, our sun, that affects the planets, including the Earth understanding that is the key :cool:
Click to expand...
You consistently fail to show how the Earthquake caused by solar activity (and vica versa apparently as well) idea you proselytize so much, fits in there.
 
JeanTate said:
I'm still working on the details of how and why Bacon sandwich eating and deer Sighting (BS for short) trigger the solar events Ben D is so hooked on.
Click to expand...


Jean Tate, did you miss the quote Haig posted from Linked In? (You know, Linked In, where all the cutting-edge science is published)

(There is a statistical evidence that shows most destructive earthquakes and volcanic eruptions take place at the lowest and highest solar cycles activity).
Click to expand...


I think if you add earthquakes that occur during periods of no deer sightings to your existing data you'll find, as did the genius Haig quoted, a correlation almost too good to be true. :)


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
The largest earthquake in the Pacific Northwest occurred in 1700 (we know this from Japanese records describing the resulting Tsunami). This was in the middle of the Maunder Minimum, which was a period of low solar activity.

Meanwhile - whilst googling for the largest known solar storm in the previous 200 years (the Carrington Superstorm, I wanted to see if there were any notable earthquakes that occurred in September 1859)

I came across this link that has some good plots in it and access to the data, so that one can perform more detailed analysis if one wants to waste time.

It is worth clicking through to see the plots, but I will just leave this quote - which is what many people have been saying, but not with these exact words.



http://www.thesuntoday.org/solar-facts/flares-and-earthquakes/

But these are large-scale statistical studies. What if there was one ‘perfect solar storm’ that happened to slip through the net? Would that then have any geological effects? Well, what is a solar flare exactly? The data I have used in the above plots are from X-ray sensors onboard the GOES series of satellites. So flares are essentially just that; increases in X-ray emission (and sometimes gamma-rays). There is, of course, increased emission from across the spectrum: radio, optical, UV, and infrared. Thankfully, the Earth’s atmosphere protects us by absorbing the vast majority of this radiation, as shown by the plot of ionospheric disturbances above. The only solar emission that makes it to the surface is visible light that we can see with our eyes, and radio emission (see figure below). So barely any of this X-ray light makes it through the atmosphere, let alone to beneath the surface to where earthquakes occur. Similarly, CMEs are essentially clouds of charged particles which get deflected by our magnetic field and rarely make it to the surface. And given that the Earth’s magnetic field has a strength similar to that of a household fridge magnet, any fluctuations caused by a CME impact cannot influence the motion of tectonic plates which carry entire continents!
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom