Haig and his Sun caused earthquakes

But this goes against anything plasma astrophysics stands for, heck, mainstream physics stands for. Although he may have been discouraged because this person knew that BT does not know even the basics of plasma physics?


Totally missing the point tusenfem !!!

He ends by saying
And yet, these people call themselves scientists. It's really, really intellectually dishonest. There should be no issue, whatsoever, with me doing this research and I should be *encouraged* to do it, so that I can learn on my own. So much for free thinking...

Get it now? ;)

Daily update ...
Eclipses, Space Weather | S0 News September 2, 2015

THE SUN AND M8+ EARTHQUAKES: THE SPF TRIGGER
Open letter to seismologists, geologists, geophysicists, planetary and space weather scientists.
August 3, 2015

http://spaceweathernews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/OpenLetter-2.pdf
 
Totally missing the point tusenfem !!!

He ends by saying

Get it now?

Just saying that I cannot imagine that someone would discourage him to do such a thing. But let BT show us what he discovers, I am sure you will let us know when something comes out.
 
I don't know who BecomiingTesla talked to but



But this goes against anything plasma astrophysics stands for, heck, mainstream physics stands for. Although he may have been discouraged because this person knew that BT does not know even the basics of plasma physics?
Perhaps he's posturing for the (EU/TD) crowd? Perhaps no one, in fact, did discourage him in the way he said?

In any case, I think this is the guy who wants to re-create every significant 'plasma' experiment that he thinks has applicability to astrophysics and space physics, and do so 'in the lab'. This includes a simulation of spiral galaxy formation and evolution - like Peratt - but including gravity (or a simulation thereof). As far as I know, he has no idea - yet! - of how to 'scale' both gravity and electromagnetism accurately, in order to carry out good simulations 'in the lab'. :D
 
Perhaps he's posturing for the (EU/TD) crowd? no one, in fact, did discourage him in the way he said?

In any case, I think this is the guy who wants to re-create every significant 'plasma' experiment that he thinks has applicability to astrophysics and space physics, and do so 'in the lab'. This includes a simulation of spiral galaxy formation and evolution - like Peratt - but including gravity (or a simulation thereof). As far as I know, he has no idea - yet! - of how to 'scale' both gravity and electromagnetism accurately, in order to carry out good simulations 'in the lab'. :D

Slight correction to your post
 
Get it now?
We get it - you are obsessed with a poster on the deluded Thunderbolts forum ranting about science, Haig.

Daily doses of deluded Ben Davidson videos:
27 August 2015 Haig: Can you understand that an EU conference speaker (Ben Davidson) is deluded?

Haig: The first 14 delusions about the Sun and earthquakes since 4 May 2015
List actually starting with item 15
  1. 27 August 2015 Haig: You cannot support an idea with an unpublished 2010 pre-print on arXiv.org that does not cite the authors of that idea.
  2. 27 August 2015 Haig: It is a lie that a NASA article that does not mention that space weather can shake the Earth is "NASA are suggesting the space weather from the Sun can shake the Earth"!
  3. 28 August 2015 Haig: The fantasy of a paper about space weather affecting power grids is about the Sun triggering earthquakes, etc.
  4. 28 August 2015 Haig: Please cite your evidence that the LIA was caused only by the Maunder Minimum.
  5. 28 August 2015 Haig: Please cite your evidence that the LIA conditions occur around every 400 years (so we are due for one now).

Outstanding questions:
27 August 2015 Haig: Can you understand that an EU conference speaker (Dr. Kongpop U-yen) is deluded?
26 August 2015 Haig: What's the "relative strength" of a solar flare that would suddenly change the rotation of the Earth?
28 August 2015 Haig: Why did you waste our time with the "theory" of an uneducated in solar or climate science, not published crank?
28 August 2015 Haig: Are you wasting our time by linking to every web page mentioning the Sun and earthquakes, etc.? The evidence is yes.

The deluded Thunderbolts forum raises its ugly head:
 
Last edited:
Haig: Complete ignorance about what you quote from the deluded Thunderbolts forum

Hey, Haig - I noticed that either you quote mined (lied about) that Thunderbolts form post or just cannot understand how deluded it is :jaw-dropp!

Here is the first link in that quote: Unexpectedly slow motions below the Sun's surface (July 20, 2012)
The interior motions of the Sun are much slower than predicted. Rather than moving at the speed of a jet plane (as previously understood) the plasma flows at a walking pace. The result of this new study, whose lead author is from the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, will be published in an upcoming issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The scientists use observations of solar oscillations from NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) to see into the Sun's interior. As Laurent Gizon and Aaron C. Birch from the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research comment in the same issue of PNAS, these new observations demonstrate the unique capabilities of helioseismology with SDO to probe the mysteries of the deep solar interior.
And then Michael Mozina goes on an irrelevant rant about solar flares which are above the Sun's surface :eye-poppi!

3 September 2015 Haig: A display of complete ignorance about what you quote from the deluded Thunderbolts forum.
 
Tom Bridgman's Electric Universe: The Three Suns of Kristian Birkeland. I. has this note:
Note for those Wishing to Comment on this Topic (under this or other posts):
No comments supporting the Birkeland solar model will be posted to these comment streams unless the commenter can provide correct numerical answers to at least half of these questions. Actually, if they are competent enough to answer half of these questions, which are at the level of high-school physics, they should be able to answer all of them.

Did Michael Mozina and other Thunderbolts followers show that they have a high-school physics level education by posting comments at the blog? Not yet :eek:!
Did Michael Mozina and other Thunderbolts followers show that they have a high-school physics level education by posting answers to the questions on the Thunderbolts forum? Not according to what Haig has quoted :eek:!
Are Michael Mozina and other Thunderbolts followers indulging in irrelevant rants about Electric Universe: The Three Suns of Kristian Birkeland. I.? Yes according to what Haig has quoted!
 

There is no number of large laughing dog icons that may represent the way I giggled all through that video (the serious tone reporting how that +1.5 sd of that phenomena coincidentally matches that -1.5 sd of another unrelated phenomena was an important factor to that)

It's the same-old argumentation of same-old waves-lashing-the-cliff and trying to prove that water is harder than rock as they may eventually contribute to erode it a bit.
 
There is no number of large laughing dog icons that may represent the way I giggled all through that video (the serious tone reporting how that +1.5 sd of that phenomena coincidentally matches that -1.5 sd of another unrelated phenomena was an important factor to that)

It's the same-old argumentation of same-old waves-lashing-the-cliff and trying to prove that water is harder than rock as they may eventually contribute to erode it a bit.


Hey that's great your having a giggle on the thread you started :D

Still not as much fun as I've had though eh?


Valuable Info

Have some more giggles please, I know I will :dl: :dl: :dl:
 
Hey that's great your having a giggle on the thread you started :D

Still not as much fun as I've had though eh?


Valuable Info

Have some more giggles please, I know I will :dl: :dl: :dl:

A person with an intellectual argument would have argued about the content of his personal video -yours in #768, as we already know yours is a one-man operation in spite of the multiple characters- . But you just doubled your bet.

I take that as an admission of failure. Well, it's clear you came to this point and still nothing but spamming a little bit what you produce for your handful of not very brilliant followers, as though trying to promote some sort of "discussion" here should show you -and your pet subject- being dealt, commented and criticized in "high academical circles". I'm sorry to disappoint you but this is just a three-ring circus and it's like you have called dibs for the spotlight for some comical segments. My giggles mean you succeeded, but in a different way to that what you intended.

[earthquakes ... and hail!!!! :sdl::sdl::sdl:]

[look up for a lot of earthquakes -4.6 just a few minutes ago- and hail -three-inch diameter pieces last night- in Argentina, yesterday and today, so you can enrich your video concoction a la von Däniken. C'mon, there's a suitable target born every minute and they're craving for the kind of amazement you offer]
 
A person with an intellectual argument would have argued about the content of his personal video -yours in #768, as we already know yours is a one-man operation in spite of the multiple characters- . But you just doubled your bet.

I take that as an admission of failure. Well, it's clear you came to this point and still nothing but spamming a little bit what you produce for your handful of not very brilliant followers, as though trying to promote some sort of "discussion" here should show you -and your pet subject- being dealt, commented and criticized in "high academical circles". I'm sorry to disappoint you but this is just a three-ring circus and it's like you have called dibs for the spotlight for some comical segments. My giggles mean you succeeded, but in a different way to that what you intended.

[earthquakes ... and hail!!!! :sdl::sdl::sdl:]

[look up for a lot of earthquakes -4.6 just a few minutes ago- and hail -three-inch diameter pieces last night- in Argentina, yesterday and today, so you can enrich your video concoction a la von Däniken. C'mon, there's a suitable target born every minute and they're craving for the kind of amazement you offer]

And your point is? :dl:

Mine is this ... Earthquakes and the Solar System

Enjoy :D
 
Still not as much fun as I've had though eh?
A near religious obsession with ignorant and deluded cranks might be fun for you Haig.
The downside is that people reading what you parrot pity you for the years of displaying ignorance and believing in delusions (4 years of the insanity that comets are rocks!). I suspect now that if you said that the sky was blue, the first reaction would be "what totally insane person are you thoughtlessly repeating now?" :p!
 
A near religious obsession with ignorant and deluded cranks might be fun for you Haig.
The downside is that people reading what you parrot pity you for the years of displaying ignorance and believing in delusions (4 years of the insanity that comets are rocks!). I suspect now that if you said that the sky was blue, the first reaction would be "what totally insane person are you thoughtlessly repeating now?" :p!


That's pure projection RC :D

I was invited to post on this thread HERE who invited you? :p

Folk can judge for themselves if this hypothesis makes sense or not by looking at the evidence presented, I'm fine with that.

You, on the otherhand, don't seem to want to allow that opportunity :covereyes
 
It is an obvious fact supported by your 4 or 5 years on the forum proving evidence that you blindly believe in the delusions of crank on the Internet, Haig.
You have been blindly obsessed with an obvious crank since 4 March 2015: 27 August 2015 Haig: Can you understand that an EU conference speaker (Ben Davidson) is deluded?

You have been blindly obsessed with the obvious deluded Thunderbolt "cult" (comets are rocks, etc. cranks) for many years, even to the point you think that dumb forum comments are valid science!
3 September 2015 Haig: The deluded Thunderbolts forum raises its ugly head

Endlessly posting crank videos is not evidence, Haig. You being in denial of science is not evidence, Haig. 19 items of ignorance and delusions is evidence of ignorance and delusions, Haig :p!
 
Last edited:
And your point is? :dl:

Mine is this ... Earthquakes and the Solar System

Enjoy :D

I was invited to post on this thread HERE who invited you? :p

It's not that you didn't but, who told you you were invited? It's obvious you have web properties and a highly monetized youtube channel and it's not our intention to help you to take care of that golden-egg-laying goose nor to reach your multimedia and financial goals.

This thread shows you have nothing about earthquakes -as you youtube link above shows- and that in spite you are "The owner of the Youtube channel, Suspicious Observers (SO) [who] is an expert in astrophysics, earth weather and space weather. His more than 51,000 subscribers, from every corner of the planet, watch the 2 to 3 minute daily updates with great regularity. SO is determined to demonstrate that the IPCC is wrong about the reasons for global warming. " (source)

So I'm thinking in starting a new thread to deal with "Haig's theories" as a whole, dealing with all their content at the same time: the mobile observatory project, spaceweathernews.com, magneticreversal.org, suspiciousobserver.org and all the KAHB LLC content. But not only the 100% pseudoscience in them but the means used to deceive the gullible.

What do you guys other than Haig think about this? Doesn't Haig's insistence in dropping his posts here make it necessary?
 
... for instance, manure like this:

KAHB LLC announces the discovery of a potential method for predicting the largest (+M8) earthquakes, using polar magnetic fields of the sun.

Using more than 35 years of data from the Wilcox Solar Observatory at Stanford University and from the United States Geological Survey, a model was constructed using patterns discerned in the polar magnetic fields of the sun. These patterns in solar magnetism were informally observed to match with the occurrence of large earthquakes on our planet, so mathematical modeling was used to formally develop an algorithm describing those relationships.
source
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom