Haig and his Sun caused earthquakes

Latest delusions: 12 August 2015 Haig: 13 delusions about the Sun and earthquakes since 2 June 2015

Talking about the paper:
14 August 2015 Haig: Do you have the delusion that Davidson et. al. is about Ben Davidson's fantasy that solar flares, CME, coronal holes cause earthquakes?

Davidson et. al. is about >M8 earthquakes and the solar magnetic field.
Ben Davidson has the delusion that solar flares, CME, coronal holes cause swarms of earthquakes of any size. His latest delusion is to link a coronal hole with a cherry picked swarm of earthquakes.

A repeat of mindless parroting of Davidson's Reality Check delusions :dl:


The Next Ice Age - An Introduction to a Possible Shift Soon


Energy from Space


Earthquakes and the Solar System


EARTHSPOTS: Storms and Earthquakes [Update]
 
Last edited:
Why should anyone waste their time explaining this to someone who has held onto the delusion that comets are rocks for many years despite knowing the several ways that the density of comets has been measured to be less than that of water, Haig?

Your off topic RC :dl:
 
Your off topic RC
The practice of parroting other people delusions without trying to understand the science that makes the ideas deluded is not off topic in a thread where you are just parroting delusions, Haig.
There would be a difference of you were citing science rather than obvious delusions in YouTube videos from an crank ignorant enough to be a speaker at the nutty electric universe conferences. EU2014 — speakers includes Davidson. Ditto for EU2015.

There is the Sun/climate connection:
12 August 2015 Haig: 5 years of denial of science dating from 19th February 2010 (a new Maunder Minimum will only have a small effect on global warming).
12 August 2015 Haig: Your denial of the real world where the Sun's output has been constant for the last 35 years while global temperatures have increased.

There is "comets are rocks" where the people you have been parroting for several years are truly deluded neo-Velikovskian cranks.
Haig is a believer of Velikovsky's delusion that planets zoomed around the Solar System to explain various myths in recent times via the Thunderbolts cranks.

Now there is the parroting of Ben Davison's delusions about solar activity causing earthquakes, weather and dandruff! The science makes this a delusion: 12 August 2015 Haig: 13 delusions about the Sun and earthquakes since 2 June 2015
 
Last edited:
Hey, I just had an idea! Hows about you, Haig, posting something beside linkspam? How about actually discussing something in this discussion forum? You must have some thoughts of your own about Jrrarglbarg's question---just how does the sun cause earthquakes? No generalizations; we want details. Oh yeah, and no links please.
 
Bible thumping. Proves nothing. What's the coupling mechanism, haig?

Hey, I just had an idea! Hows about you, Haig, posting something beside linkspam? How about actually discussing something in this discussion forum? You must have some thoughts of your own about Jrrarglbarg's question---just how does the sun cause earthquakes? No generalizations; we want details. Oh yeah, and no links please.


Ok, just this once ;)

This is a good place to start I think from what I remember reading.

Three things help determine how much energy from the Sun is transferred to Earth's magnetosphere from the solar wind: the speed of the solar wind, the strength of the magnetic field outside Earth's bounds (known as the interplanetary magnetic field) and which direction it is pointing, since a large southward component is necessary to connect successfully to Earth's magnetosphere and transfer energy. The hypothesis is the shock of that energy arrival, triggers earthquakes, volcanoes and other events.

Oh I so want to post a link :boxedin:
 
Ok, just this once ;)

This is a good place to start I think from what I remember reading.

Three things help determine how much energy from the Sun is transferred to Earth's magnetosphere from the solar wind: the speed of the solar wind, the strength of the magnetic field outside Earth's bounds (known as the interplanetary magnetic field) and which direction it is pointing, since a large southward component is necessary to connect successfully to Earth's magnetosphere and transfer energy. The hypothesis is the shock of that energy arrival, triggers earthquakes, volcanoes and other events.

Oh I so want to post a link :boxedin:


So no mechanism, no "how"? How disappointing :(
 
Ok, just this once ;)

This is a good place to start I think from what I remember reading.

Three things help determine how much energy from the Sun is transferred to Earth's magnetosphere from the solar wind: the speed of the solar wind, the strength of the magnetic field outside Earth's bounds (known as the interplanetary magnetic field) and which direction it is pointing, since a large southward component is necessary to connect successfully to Earth's magnetosphere and transfer energy. The hypothesis is the shock of that energy arrival, triggers earthquakes, volcanoes and other events.

Oh I so want to post a link :boxedin:

No coupling mechanism described between the "shock" and earthquakes. I would like to see quantification of this "shock" and how one measures it. Would a bridge rectifier help?
 
Ok, just this once ;)

This is a good place to start I think from what I remember reading.

Three things help determine how much energy from the Sun is transferred to Earth's magnetosphere from the solar wind: the speed of the solar wind, the strength of the magnetic field outside Earth's bounds (known as the interplanetary magnetic field) and which direction it is pointing, since a large southward component is necessary to connect successfully to Earth's magnetosphere and transfer energy. The hypothesis is the shock of that energy arrival, triggers earthquakes, volcanoes and other events.

Oh I so want to post a link :boxedin:

So no mechanism, no "how"? How disappointing :(

No coupling mechanism described between the "shock" and earthquakes. I would like to see quantification of this "shock" and how one measures it. Would a bridge rectifier help?

See, this is why poor Haig is avoiding answering! You just diss his answers. The answer is clear as honey. The sun connects to earth's magnetosphere and transfer energy. This creates a shock and the shock triggers earthquakes, volcanoes and other events. Maybe earth is ticklish?
 
See, this is why poor Haig is avoiding answering! You just diss his answers. The answer is clear as honey. The sun connects to earth's magnetosphere and transfer energy. This creates a shock and the shock triggers earthquakes, volcanoes and other events. Maybe earth is ticklish?


The key issue, assuming this sun-based currents were to exisy, is how specifically that energy is coupled to the earth. The reason poor, poor Haig doesnt answer is because he doesn't have one. Calling it a "shock" isn't a mechanism, it's hand-waving. How does that energy end up deep in the earth? Haig doesn't want to answer because if he proposes specifics, they're subject to analyisis. This is the same reason the EC people avoid showing any math or equations.
 
As any fule kno, mathematics is a jargon invented by scientists to obfuscate a Universe which is best described by analogy.

For instance, a shock can set off an earthquake just as a shock can knock something off a shelf. No need for mathemajics or so-called quantifiables.
 
No coupling mechanism described between the "shock" and earthquakes. I would like to see quantification of this "shock" and how one measures it. Would a bridge rectifier help?

See, this is why poor Haig is avoiding answering! You just diss his answers. The answer is clear as honey. The sun connects to earth's magnetosphere and transfer energy. This creates a shock and the shock triggers earthquakes, volcanoes and other events. Maybe earth is ticklish?

The key issue, assuming this sun-based currents were to exisy, is how specifically that energy is coupled to the earth. The reason poor, poor Haig doesnt answer is because he doesn't have one. Calling it a "shock" isn't a mechanism, it's hand-waving. How does that energy end up deep in the earth? Haig doesn't want to answer because if he proposes specifics, they're subject to analyisis. This is the same reason the EC people avoid showing any math or equations.


Watch this and learn ;) Major News, Storm Alerts
 
Haig: 14 delusions about the Sun and earthquakes since 4 May 2015

Interesting update on our variable star and a low earthquake period ...
Usual link to a crank video rather than understanding the science which is not a surprise since we have 5 June 2015 Haig: Some of the ignorance, fantasies, delusions and even lies that you have believed in since 2010..
  1. 4 May 2015 Haig: The scientific evidence is that there is no connection between solar activity and earthquakes.
  2. 13 May 2015 Haig: The fantasies of Suspicious0bservers are not scientific evidence!
  3. 27 May 2015 Haig: Can you understand that Schnepf et. al is not about the Sun or earthquakes (no matter what delusions Ben Davidson may have about it!) ?
  4. 2 June 2015 Haig: Can you understand that ignorant comments on a crank web site are not scientific evidence.
  5. 2 June 2015 Haig: Four points of delusion in your 30 May 2015 post
  6. 4 June 2015 Haig: Your ignorance about Scott, et. al. and a fantasy about its results does not mean that the Sun causes earthquakes when the scientific evidence is that it does not!.
  7. 4 June 2015 Haig: Another abysmal mistake about science (plasma tubes in this case)
  8. 4 June 2015 Haig: A fantasy that Mostl et. al. has anything to do with earthquakes.
  9. 8 June 2015 Haig: Can you understand that Ben Davison lied about Antarctica ice melting?
  10. 9 June 2015 Haig: Why Ben Davidson's Sun -> earthquake videos are evidence of his delusions (not science!)
  11. 11 June 2015: Haig: It is idiotic to cite a video of Earth's Role as an Electromagnet and the Creation of Auroras in a thread about the Sun and earthquakes
  12. 4 August 2014 Haig: The delusion that a PDF on a crank web site by unqualified authors is scientific literature :jaw-dropp!
  13. 11 August 2015 Haig: Can you understand that the Sánchez-Sesma paper is about multi-millennial-scale effects, not delusions such as the Sun is causing global warming, weather, earthquakes, dandruff , etc.
  14. 14 August 2015 Haig: Do you have the delusion that Davidson et. al. is about Ben Davidson's fantasy that solar flares, CME, coronal holes cause earthquakes?
 
Last edited:
The links between our variable Star and earthquakes, volcanoes and major weather/climate events is becoming more obvious ...

Driving Force in Climate Changes, Volcanos and Earthquakes
During periods of low solar activity, which we are now experiencing, the solar winds decrease allowing more cosmic rays to penetrate, which increases cloud formation, which would be the main cooling mechanism from diminished solar activity. Whatever theories are presented we have history to tell us that we have had mini ice ages at times when the sun has shown diminished sun spot activity.


CONNECTION FOUND BETWEEN SOLAR OUTPUT, CLIMATE AND EARTHQUAKES
In fact, a new trend of increased number and intensity of earthquakes and volcanoes globally, has already started and is generating serious concern in the geology field. This increased threat level warning we are issuing is intimately linked to an ongoing dramatic reduction in the energy output of the Sun. These events, tracked primarily by sunspot counts, are called ‘solar minimums,’ or more descriptively ‘solar hibernations.’ Analysis of past climate changes have also demonstrated that when these changes in the Sun happen, the Earth desce nds into a long, deep, cold climate period. These periods are universally understood within the solar physics community. Our previous research indicating the start of the next solar hibernation is now confirmed by NASA


**** The Theory of Relational Cycles of Solar Activity ****
(The RC Theory)
(1) There exists a family of solar activity cycles that has a profound and direct influence on the Earth’s climate.
(2) These cycles are called ‘relational cycles’ since their effects can be experienced or ‘related’ to during one or two human lifetimes.
(3) There is a “Centennial Cycle” of 90-100 years duration, which manifests itself with solar activity minimums and associated low temperatures with episodes lasting a few years to 1-2 decades.
(4) There is a “Bi-Centennial Cycle” of about 206 years that is the most powerful of the relational cycles and has significant effects on the climate of the Earth lasting many decades resulting in the most extreme variations in solar activity and temperatures.
(5) These cycles are correlated strongly to all past major temperature lows.
(6) There is remarkable regularity and hence the predictability of these oscillations, such that the theory may be a powerful tool in forecasting of major temperature and climatic cycles on Earth, many decades in advance.
(7) There may be other relational cycles of shorter duration accounting for lesser solar climatic events which may be revealed in subsequent research.

RC Theory, Copyright. John L. Casey April 30, 2007
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom