you know what they say:
"If you aren't an environmentalist before the age of 20, ... "
Socialist, but yeah sure. Unlike earlier generations younger people have to be serious environmentalists or their world (not ours) will be hell.
you know what they say:
"If you aren't an environmentalist before the age of 20, ... "
You must be misreading. I have said nothing derogatory about Greta. However, I have noted that a society who defers complex policy decisions to 16 year olds should be scorned.
Someone called Andrew Bolt is in the news today for apparently attacking Greta Thunberg, the teenage climate change campaigner (who, I was surprised to note) has not been mentioned on this forum before - at least searching for "Thunberg" gives no results).
Unfortunately Bolt's column is behind a paywall, so I can't see exactly what he said, beyond his opening few paragraphs, which include:
"No teenager is more freakishly influential than Greta Thunberg, the deeply disturbed messiah of the global warming movement.
...
I have never seen a girl so young and with so many mental disorders treated by so many adults as a guru."
So, Thunberg - a force for much-needed change, or a mentally ill "pig-tailed soothsayer". Or something else?
Socialist, but yeah sure. Unlike earlier generations younger people have to be serious environmentalists or their world (not ours) will be hell.
Whatever. I have a policy of not taking children seriously on any issue.
Does anyone that's dismissing this young lady as irrelevant actually want to address what she's said rather than going with the "She's a child, I'm ignoring her" fallacy?
Does she have some insight into climate change that contemporary climate scientists do not?
Young people with outspoken opinions=women with outspoken opinions=******* with outspoken opinions. All can be safely ignored by our conservative friends here.
Well it makes a change from ignoring world class experts.
Is this thread about Bolt or Greta Thunberg?
The first I was aware of Greta was in a TV news report which presented her as a random schoolgirl from Sweden who had made her own way to a climate conference (Poland iirc?). She was filmed approaching the door with her placard and being let in, whereupon she sat on the floor of the lobby attracting a lot of attention.
Impressive!
WAIT!
A few months later I discovered that actually she has two pushy celebrity parents behind her.
So, not just a random schoolkid after all, but a carefully orchestrated campaign to make her famous like Mamma and Pappa.
Got anything to say about what she actually says?
Or is this the character assassination thread where we ignore the issues she's raising and focus on the ad hominem attacks?
I don't like being manipulated by PR.
I was conned into believing she was some random school girl who did all of these things completely off her own bat.
Got anything to say about what she actually says?
Is she actually saying anything that you yourself haven't already said? Anything new that hasn't been discussed here already?