• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Good Pick for EPA

Dr. Keith said:
When a group asks that their feelings and beliefs be left unchallenged that is the definition of asking for a safe space, no matter their ideology.

Personally, I would be more embarrassed by hypocrisy than empathy.
Click to expand...

Lol
when have Christians asked for their beliefs to be unchallenged. Your first clue would be Christians are charged with going everywhere to spread the good news. Does that look like people wanting a safe space?
 
Resume said:
First off, you've no idea as to "my side." Second, the right has been bitchin' about protection from scary ideas for just about ever.
Wah, protect me from evolution.
Wah, protect me from teh gayz.
Wah, protect me from any evidence-based information that challenges my intellect or pocketbook.
Wah, teh athiests.
Wah, I can't just dump chemicals into any available watershed.
Wah, I have to clean up my mine waste.
Wah, I can't bring my gun everywhere.
Wah, teh muslims.
Wah, teh meskins.
Wah, protect me from everything I don't understand or like.

How's that for honesty?
Click to expand...
As usual it's dishonesty, no one fighting for this things are asking for a safe space, that is your side asking for it and setting it up for the poor little cowards.

As far as dumping chemicals into a watershed, that is just stupid.

Are you going to accuse yourself since you continue to buy goods from polluters?
 
Aepervius said:
I am not from the US, I am in a country where there is a REAL left.

And yes what I mentioned is the bloody stupid attempt to create safe space where evolution don't pollute the mind of their childs. You may protest it as much as you want, but it is quite clear that christian are not "fighting for what they want" they are often fighting to be protected from information they do not like. In other word, they want a safe space free from that info.



Exactely. But i don#t expect logged to admit to that.
Click to expand...
Reality from the left:rolleyes:

Can't even admit this term "safe space" is owned by the left. The reason the left owns this term is because they've actually set these places up. Why would they set places like this up? Because they are wimps, cowards and now since hillary lost, losers! ;)
 
Resume said:
I noticed they are cowards, desperately trying to save themselves from awkward information that challenges, embarrasses, and even negates their superstitions. Bans on teaching evolution, bans on interracial marriage and gay marriage, attempts to censor anything and everything that doesn't agree with their world-view.
Click to expand...
Your first clue might be that evolution isn't banned anywhere. Your second clue would be that Christians don't oppose interracial marriage. My brother is in one and so isn't many that go to my church.

Your're seriously misinformed, not surprising.
 
The Shrike said:
Hmm, let's see if you can figure out why there aren't that many old growth forests down south [sic].
Click to expand...

Because they were cut more than a century ago, and they wern't a thousand years old. Not much need to have old growth on the East coast. it isn't practical to have old growth longleaf pine, white oak, or Poplar forests. That is why we manage forests. You are for that aren't you?
 
Jerrymander said:
Most can't afford a less hospitable earth either. Just ask the Bangladeshis.
Click to expand...
The Bangladeshis can neither afford your liberal dream, nor do they have your alarmist tenancies. They like most others have given up on your hoax.
 
logger said:
Not much need to have old growth on the East coast.
Click to expand...
Somewhere in the multiverse Ivory-billed Woodpeckers, Passenger Pigeons, and Bachman's Warblers are disagreeing with you.

logger said:
That is why we manage forests.
Click to expand...
Forests are managed for watershed protection, biodiversity protection, air quality, carbon sequestration, recreation, etc. in addition to the provisioning of pulpwood and sawtimber. The EPA is interested in all of these things, as should every American.
 
Deleted, ot.

As far as dumping chemicals into a watershed, that is just stupid.
Click to expand...
No **** Sherlock.

Are you going to accuse yourself since you continue to buy goods from polluters?
Click to expand...
I do my best.
 
Last edited:
The Shrike said:
Somewhere in the multiverse Ivory-billed Woodpeckers, Passenger Pigeons, and Bachman's Warblers are disagreeing with you.
Click to expand...

A bit late for them, that all we lost?
Actually they didn't really have self awareness and sure as hell don't now. ;)


Forests are managed for watershed protection, biodiversity protection, air quality, carbon sequestration, recreation, etc. in addition to the provisioning of pulpwood and sawtimber. The EPA is interested in all of these things, as should every American.
Click to expand...

No ****

Except now you can add economics , there's a new sheriff in town and he's going to be looking out for people and their families.
 
Last edited:
Science is so simple. Plants eat carbon and **** oxygen.

Anyway, who doesn't want warmer oceans and longer summers?
 
logger said:
No ****

Except now you can add economics , there's a new sheriff in town and he's going to be looking out for people and their families.
Click to expand...

I think if you genuinely believe this, and the families in question are blue-collar workers and their families, then the next few years will be a disappointment
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom