Joey McGee
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2011
- Messages
- 10,307
So he painted himself nude in the upper body and the lower body, you know he couldn't resist painting a picture of his willy... I'm sure it will be released some day.
They're better than anything I could do.
I don't think using ones own (in)ability to paint to judge someone else's talent is a proper metric.Well, I think they're great. They're much better than I could do.

Stirring in its portayal of feline angst. Is Peter hungry or contemplating his place in a hungry world?
I've seen much worse paintings prominently displayed in museums.
I won't get into how much I despise the man. But as an artist myself, there are some I actually like. I learned long ago that because someone is creative doesn't make them a good person.
I've seen much worse paintings prominently displayed in museums.
I haven't. And I've been in dozens of art museums.
I liked the one of the schnauzer.
I still say that the little hint of artistic vision I see in some of this would be better realized by photography, especially old fashioned black and white work. All politics aside, let's be generous for a moment and surmise some artistic ember here. I think Mr. Bush's temperament would be more at home in a darkroom.They're not bad for an amateur with only five years' experience. Maybe a more Jackson Pollockesque approach would fit his ability better?
Okay, most would agree that his paintings are, well, terrible.
His paintings are ****.
Yes, I saw it like a man who used to be extremely busy, but suddenly has a lot of time on his hands, and says to himself one day "I'm gonna learn to paint!" For a few years all his paintings are pretty crap, but hey, he's learning.They're not bad for an amateur with only five years' experience. Maybe a more Jackson Pollockesque approach would fit his ability better?