In short, you've got no good answer, then, given that you're trying to condemn us for not reacting to something that wasn't presented in the first place and not even backing it up with valid evidence for your claim. Good to know that you think of the Arabs as equivalent to animals, if you're going to use that kind of response. But back to your claim here, yes, when direct evidence of unnecessary harm is being done by a group, I have no problem with condemning them for such and certainly have. I'm not in favor of circumcision or the Jewish bris at all and have said as much before.
The false equivalence here would be staggering, frankly, if it was in any way unexpected when dealing with you on this subject. Either way, it's hard to tell how, exactly, you intended this, given your tone versus the facts. If you are, in fact, comparing how common the Jewish cultural tradition of circumcision is to how common the Palestinian cultural tradition of teaching hatred for the Jews is, that would quite undermine your attempted claim here.
Sad as usual. There's lots and lots of room for valid criticism of Israel and various actions done by the Jewish people, and, in fact, quite a bit of it has been forwarded in this thread without anyone claiming anti-semitism, irrationality, or anything like that. That doesn't mean that all criticism of Israel and the Jews is valid or at all reasonable and combined with a body of work of very one-sided claims that includes a number of not particularly rational claims, certainly can lead to the conclusion that one is a racist who irrationally hates Jews. Naturally, that doesn't negate facts, but it certainly makes the one presenting them much less trustworthy.
I'm quite sure that the Israeli victimhood propaganda isn't all that hard to find, even if I don't feel like looking up any at the moment. With that said, though, there's more than enough in the way of legitimately concerning issues that such can easily be as good as ignored or dismissed from consideration in any rational discussion.
Seriously? At last check, the United States has been the single largest contributor of various kinds of aid to the Palestinians over the years. Yes, it has certainly given more to Israel, but the amount to the Palestinians has hardly been insignificant. There's more that can be said, certainly, but to what end?
Besides that, though, there is certainly the very real question of why you choose those criteria, rather than just leaving things at putting the credit and blame for various events where it goes, without dragging in largely superfluous considerations. Given that this place has as good as nothing to do with the US' decisions when it comes to offering official criticism or aid to Israel, your reasoning rings entirely hollow.
