Besides, how do you tax just the gay segment? A "sir" charge?
which are monolithically heterosexual in mainstream games.
You're kidding, right? Aren't a lot of male figure skaters gay? This is a joke, right?
Ice skating, "monolithically heterosexual?"
Surely you jest. (Or, things have changed while I wasn't paying attention.)
You mean it didn't happen and we dont have to pay for this mess.The Montreal event was not the "Gay Games". The Gay Games were here in Chicago last summer, and just managed to break even

I don't see why Quebec couldn't just repeat what they did to pay off the massive debts from the '76 Olympics, and have an extra tax on tobacco.
Isn't that what you want, a tax on fags?
I think they should force those that regally participate in sports to pay for it. And they can stop bothering us by canceling the London Marathon for the next 10 years.
I don't see why Quebec couldn't just repeat what they did to pay off the massive debts from the '76 Olympics, and have an extra tax on tobacco.
Isn't that what you want, a tax on fags?
I was really being half serious about that no parade for 10 year remark. Of course you can't refuse anyone's right to express themselves.
It just "bums" me out that I have to pay for this futile endeavour that I didn't even agree to in the first place. It's their mistake, they should pay for it (not only the gays, but the idiot authorities who financed it).
I was really being half serious about that no parade for 10 year remark. Of course you can't refuse anyone's right to express themselves.
It just "bums" me out that I have to pay for this futile endeavour that I didn't even agree to in the first place. It's their mistake, they should pay for it (not only the gays, but the idiot authorities who financed it).
... the Olympics have an active ban on gay people participating, or even attending.
No, that was generally done "with a crowbar."And I always thought Olympic wrestling in Greece was how they separated the men from the boys.![]()
Sounds like it's too late, and you're already going to pay. Perhaps the city/province has a chance to sue the organizers because of some breach, but I doubt they have a case or that the organizers have any money anway. As for "the gays," there is no such entity. If there was, they would have money, since they don't spend what they earn raising children, for the most part. My only suggestion is to vote the bums out.I was really being half serious about that no parade for 10 year remark. Of course you can't refuse anyone's right to express themselves.
It just "bums" me out that I have to pay for this futile endeavour that I didn't even agree to in the first place. It's their mistake, they should pay for it (not only the gays, but the idiot authorities who financed it).
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2006/11/13/outgames.html
Now who is going to pay for this idiocy? The general population of course.![]()
Why doesn't the gay community pay for it?
As for "the gays," there is no such entity. If there was, they would have money, since they don't spend what they earn raising children, for the most part. My only suggestion is to vote the bums out..
It gives gay people a chance to compete in sports like gymnastics and ice skating, which are monolithically heterosexual in mainstream games.
"the gays", haha, I love "the rednecks".
I know, why don't you just levvee a hefty tax on all purchases of astroglide and dildos and use the money to offset the deficit. That'll fix them gays good.
That's homophobic of you! Straight women use dildos, too, ya know.