• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Fyziks 101

Fyziks 101, this hilarious, making fun of physics? So you wouldn't be caught using physics? You have success, you won if that is your goal. Guess there was no room for physics in the truth movement, p4t hate to use it, and refuse to fix major errors, even with help from people here. Simple cut and paste could fix p4t web page of FailFyziks.

Looking to physics, I found the root cause of this thread.
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen." Einstein
Click to expand...


Stop murdering physics, and learn some.
 
R.Mackey said:
I'm having "Net Force = Zero" flashbacks here.
Click to expand...

Those flashbacks still haunt me to this day. As do others, such as "Tray stacking man", "Clunkity clunk", and of course our recent "Box man". Now we get to add "Brick stacker" to the list. Congrats turbo!
 
Why is it that whenever a "Truther" makes a thread about physics they provide zero calculations?
 
Last edited:
roundhead said:
Read this quote by the poster:

Why would you even attempt to use still frames to determine motion, when video is readily available? Dumb, dumb, dumb...

I think it makes my point. The Zapruder film was used to determine motion, frame by frame, and video was available.
Click to expand...

That can only mean you are far more gullible than I thought, roundhead. Turbofan depends on folks like you.

You'll note that Turbofan tried to use a still shot to claim "upward explosions" when the video showed downward motion. Unlike you, no one here fell for it.
 
WildCat said:
It is likely accelerating. And there is resistance, but the resistance is not nearly enough to stop the collapse from continuing to accelerate, and certainly not enough to stop it. Think of a truck getting struck by a freight train.
Click to expand...

You have that all backwards!

The top section was much smaller than the lower section (about 1/3).

Try instead...a truck hitting a frieght train.

Or better yet, one truck slowly bending into two stronger trucks.

You do realize not all columns were cut? It's not as if this upper section
just suddenly dropped when all of the other inner and outter columns decided
to leave town.
 
Turbo do you understand that the floors braced the inner core to the external columns ?

Again,simply answer yes or no.
 
Last edited:
Turbofan said:
You have that all backwards!

The top section was much smaller than the lower section (about 1/3).

Try instead...a truck hitting a frieght train.

Or better yet, one truck slowly bending into two stronger trucks.

You do realize not all columns were cut? It's not as if this upper section
just suddenly dropped when all of the other inner and outter columns decided
to leave town.
Click to expand...

Think of 20 or 30 some floors hitting a single floor. That's the proper way to think about the collapse. Again, the upper section never had to challenge the entire lower section as a whole; it went by sections defined by either floors or the connection points on the columns providing vertical support. It overwhelmed each section. Your analogies are not properly reflecting what happened that day.
 
Turbofan said:
You have that all backwards!

The top section was much smaller than the lower section (about 1/3).
Click to expand...
Hey structural engineering and physics genius: the top section doesn't hit the entire lower part of the building all at once. It takes out one floor at a time. You may have noticed the progressive collapse in the videos? :rolleyes:
 
Turbofan said:
You have that all backwards!

The top section was much smaller than the lower section (about 1/3).

Try instead...a truck hitting a frieght train.

Or better yet, one truck slowly bending into two stronger trucks.

You do realize not all columns were cut? It's not as if this upper section
just suddenly dropped when all of the other inner and outter columns decided
to leave town.
Click to expand...
gravity
 
Yes or no question turbo. Did the collapsing portion of the towers have to take out one floor at a time or all of them at the same time?
 
Turbofan said:
You have that all backwards!

The top section was much smaller than the lower section (about 1/3).

Try instead...a truck hitting a frieght train.

Or better yet, one truck slowly bending into two stronger trucks.

You do realize not all columns were cut? It's not as if this upper section
just suddenly dropped when all of the other inner and outter columns decided
to leave town.
Click to expand...
Be the first person in history that can answer this...

After the first 0.5 seconds of slippage IN THE AREA OF IMPACT explain what power could have prevented collapse. Also explain why a 15 story chunk of office building would not and could not have caused an overload of the remaining heat weakened columns IN THE AREA OF IMPACT?
 
Turbofan said:
I see nobody tried to answer any of the questions, so I'll post them again.





Because it was blown up. See photos. Answer the questions.


That arrow is pointing to the ejection of dust shooting upward. Explain
how a gravity induced fall shoot material upward.
Click to expand...
They have all been answered multiple times (I mostly just read this occasionally to see if the CTers have gotten any stupider. I am never surprised. They have (especially if you consider re-asking things - with no new data to support whatever it is they think they are thinking/observing - that have already been thoroughly explained/debunked/proven not just wrong but incompetently wrong-to be really incredibly incompetant and stupid) never made me wrong!!:)
 
Oh, by the by, think about air pressure. A weird thing we have because air is matter and has mass but is not normally really dense.
 
ElMondoHummus said:
Also, your analogy fails to consider the fact that the falling section never had to pit its momentum against the entire structure as a whole. It was facing single floors at a time, or to be more specific, single segments defined by where the columns were interconnected. It is a mistake to not consider the post-initiation system a series of floor-by-floor failures. That may be an oversimplification, but it is indeed in the right direction, whereas thinking of the lower section as a "whole" in the sense that a solid block is one, homogenous, continuous piece, is mistaken.
Click to expand...

You all don't seem to know the internal network of steel in the Twins apparently?

Remember the massive 47 steel core columns? That is not air...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/wtc_core_large.jpg
http://www.wtc7.net/store/books/wakingup/samples/docs/p2/site1099c.jpg

What about the 200+ outter columns?
http://www.positiontoknow.com/S-11/img/exterioroftowers7yr.jpg

On and... this is all gravity :rolleyes:

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc1plumecascade.jpg
 
Turbofan said:
You all don't seem to know the internal network of steel in the Twins apparently?

Remember the massive 47 steel core columns? That is not air...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/wtc_core_large.jpg
http://www.wtc7.net/store/books/wakingup/samples/docs/p2/site1099c.jpg

What about the 200+ outter columns?
http://www.positiontoknow.com/S-11/img/exterioroftowers7yr.jpg

On and... this is all gravity :rolleyes:

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc1plumecascade.jpg
Click to expand...

Is there even an argument in that post? I can't even figure out what your general point might be.
 
Newtons Bit said:
Is there even an argument in that post? I can't even figure out what your general point might be.
Click to expand...

I'm having as much trouble figuring him out as you... apparently he still doesn't understand that bricks and 110-story office buildings aren't the same...
 
johnny karate said:
Turbofan: If the collapse of the towers was so odd and in such violation of the laws of physics that a layperson such as yourself can perceive these oddities and violations merely by looking at photos of the collapse, then why hasn't any of this been discerned and/or revealed by a single MSM outlet, law enforcement agency, or investigative body on the planet?
Click to expand...

Bump for Turbofan.
 
The best thing about this thread is anyone with more than a cursory knowledge of physics can read TurboFans arguments here. After reading them I do not know how anyone could imagine Turbofan has the requisite knowledge to understand how a flight data recorder.

the brick analogy is something my 10 year old would not fall for.

Here is another interesting post by Turbofan
How can you have compression and vacuum at the same time?
I thought the tower was compressing the air to create the squibs?
Click to expand...
This is an amazing statement for someone who is supposedly technical enough to quote and understand the manual for the FDR's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom