February Stundie nominations

More Moon madness from Icke forum:

davidicke com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059680012&postcount=96

"The only reason the Moon is 400 times closer than the sun / 400 times smaller than the sun (so that they both appear the same size in the sky) and that one side of the Moon faces Earth at all times, is because the moon was artifically moved into its orbit around the planet by aliens. This answer should be blatantly obvious to anyone with half a brain and awareness that alien life is both everywhere in the galaxy, as well as in our solar system and on our planet. THe cover up is pathetic as it is grand in its scope. It should be blatantly obvious that the moon is both artificial in construction as well as are other moons in our solar system. This realization can be gleamed by any cursory investigation of the information at hand regarding our moon. It is unnatural and artificial in both its construction, its location, and its interaction with our planet, and mankind will either become overtly aware of this fact, or be slaughtered, in the near future."

:jaw-dropp
 
The thread "Dutch central bank using remote viewing and remote influecing to manipulate markets", from dvictr, certainly deserves some kind of recognition,, even if only by a clinical psychologist.

Dutch central bankers are in a battle with zionist extremists and Iranian nuclear transmutationists to control the worlds supply of gold and the price of precious metals.

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/02/10/business-eu-netherlands-pension-gold_8302680.html

It is widely believed that the Iranian nuclear program is on the cutting edge of developing a process to synthesize platinum metals and gold. This technology has become an issue of national security to the Israeli interest in world gold supplies rumored to be transported and stored inside the hollow moon compound.

Nout Wellink the governor for the central bank in the Netherlands has mastered an ancient technique of theta harvesting that allows him to foresee world events. Apparently they are siding with the Iranians and plan on crushing the zionist scheme on cornering the worlds market of gold. They have ordered all mutual and pension funds to liquidate gold holdings as a method of flooding the market and hitting the moon zionists where it hurts the most.. in there checkbooks. This selling pressure hopefully will avoid WW3.

The problem at this point is that they may use the remote viewing to manipulate other markets and take control from the zionists. this is a fluid story and i am still gathering evidence.
http://i.imgur.com/889aw.jpg

I really can't choose which bit to nominate.

Dave
 
More Moon madness from Icke forum:

davidicke com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059680012&postcount=96

"The only reason the Moon is 400 times closer than the sun / 400 times smaller than the sun (so that they both appear the same size in the sky) and that one side of the Moon faces Earth at all times, is because the moon was artifically moved into its orbit around the planet by aliens. This answer should be blatantly obvious to anyone with half a brain and awareness that alien life is both everywhere in the galaxy, as well as in our solar system and on our planet. THe cover up is pathetic as it is grand in its scope. It should be blatantly obvious that the moon is both artificial in construction as well as are other moons in our solar system. This realization can be gleamed by any cursory investigation of the information at hand regarding our moon. It is unnatural and artificial in both its construction, its location, and its interaction with our planet, and mankind will either become overtly aware of this fact, or be slaughtered, in the near future."

:jaw-dropp
Can't argue with that. ;)
 
The problem at this point is that they may use the remote viewing to manipulate other markets and take control from the zionists. this is a fluid stupid story and i am still gathering evidence nonsense.
Sorted that for him
 
The thread "Dutch central bank using remote viewing and remote influecing to manipulate markets", from dvictr, certainly deserves some kind of recognition,, even if only by a clinical psychologist.



I really can't choose which bit to nominate.

Dave
.
The bit where it says "obvious troll is obvious."

Seriously, has there *ever* been a thread started by this entity which was *not* simply made up to see if zie could generate responses?
.
 
The bit where it says "obvious troll is obvious."

Seriously, has there *ever* been a thread started by this entity which was *not* simply made up to see if zie could generate responses?


Nope. dvictr is a classic troll.
 
Okay....who was in charge of making sure the artificial Moon didn't look fake? And who let it out of the bag that the aliens are really right here on Earth?
 
Interesting WTC analogy at ATS

Originally posted by DIDtm
Originally posted by FDNY343

Yep, now, do the math for the kinetic energy involved in the impact, and do the math for the heat energy released by the fuel, and then the heat energy for the resulting fires.

Hell, a bullet weighs about .25 ounces. Most people weigh about 140 lbs. Which translates to 2240 ounces.

So, a bullet weighs just 1/8960th of a person, and it will kill you. I wonder, how could something so small kill us? I mean, we outweigh the bullet MANY times over. But yet, I don't think you wanna stand in front of one, do you?

Completely illogical statement.
Does a bullet, which weighs 1/8960th of a person cause all the bones in the body to break and basically cremate so the body falls down into a lard ball?
Or does a bullet cause extreme interior damage to organs, muscles, etc and cause blood loss which in turn creates death?
Or it hits the heart or brain and the failure of either one of those cause death?

Try again.

Fitz
 
Anders Lindman is on a roll. Anyone here know how a cannon works? Seriously?

Put a hefty chunk of dynamite behind the jet engine and you have a formidable cannon. Seriously! With most of the explosive power going sideways into the already exploding fireball of kerosene.

Seriously. A word that doesn't mean what Anders Lindman thinks it means.

Dave
 
I nominate the following post for a Stundie:

Originally Posted by deepatrax
a belief doesn't actually require evidence, if you could prove an existence of God, it wouldn't be called a belief.
 
Anders Lindman is on a roll. Anyone here know how a cannon works? Seriously?



Seriously. A word that doesn't mean what Anders Lindman thinks it means.

Dave

As ex Redleg in the Real US Army, and as part owner of a 12 pound Muzzle Loading Napoleon in A Civil War Reenactment unit, I can assure you thant Lindman would not know a artillery piece if it was stuck up a certain part of his anatomy.
 
As ex Redleg in the Real US Army, and as part owner of a 12 pound Muzzle Loading Napoleon in A Civil War Reenactment unit, I can assure you thant Lindman would not know a artillery piece if it was stuck up a certain part of his anatomy.

Sweet! I bet that's fun...do you ever yell "For those about to rock....Fire!!!...we salute you!!!!" I know I would.
 
Physics is your friend

One of the first tests they did when Niel Armstrong didnt land on the moon, was to show the many millions of viewers a hammer and feather test, apperantly if there is no or little gravity on the moon, then the hammer would have fallen to the floor faster than the feather, reason is this, the astronaughts have to wear very heavy lead boots to keep them grounded or they would fly away wouldnt they, well why didnt the feather fly away, that didnt have lead boots did it. think about it.

Even better

I did do my reasearch and you guys are dumber than those two from the film with jim carey, my God how do you see?

any resonable mind can see that the feather would have just drifted off somewhere, and the moon is not a vacum, idiots HUH!

I realize it's a kid...but still stundie-licious.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=157952
 

How in God's name you can put that video link and a laughing dog together in the same post is beyond me.

I looked at a couple of those videos and I'm weeping again.

Maybe I'm thin-skinned, but I'm just not able to.... I dunno, I can't explain it or express it. It just seems kind of disgusting to me, that's all, even though I know the laughing dog wasn't aimed at the videos.
 
There are sharks off Java, and a local man just jumped over one.

In fact, why MUST it be the result of any deliberate act?
Because it would be in the generally believed theory otherwise.

The conspiracist God-of-the-Gaps argument stripped of all the surrounding flim-flam: Anything that is not perfectly understood and explained can only be the result of a conspiracy.

Dave
 

Back
Top Bottom