• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

FBI's Anthrax Media Strategy Explained

He can slander them all he wants , they aren`t members here.
Or are they?

If they are...they can accuse me of anything they want. Just take me into custody. Please.

4709488f7a8b1_7903n.jpg
 
If the FBI can accuse people of mass murder, then so can I. Ever heard of equal protection of the laws?

Good God, that is just totally nuts. For your own self-interest, you had better get a clue really, really fast. Because if you really believe this, this particular piece of idiocy will sooner or later get you into a great deal of (very well earned) trouble.
 
No credible evidnece points to Dr. Ivins, a loyal Amecian with 33 years of government service, with his colleagues 100% behind him. He was not in NJ when the anthrax letters were mailed, nor does he have a motive, plus the letters were in someone else's handwriting.

Please spare us your hatred of America. Not even the grand jury believed the evidence or returned an indictment.


As I wrote in an e-mail to your associates, you are conspiracy liars. Your purpose is to slander America and frame innocent people for a monstrous crime committed by jihadists. Why do you care about the anthrax letters? After all, we're talking about an event that actually happened. How does that concern you? Can you possibly shoehorn your imaginary conspiracy into the narrative? Why bother?
 
this was supposed to be in "conspiracy theories", not "9/11 conspiracy theories".

Someone must have moved it on me, or hacked into my computer.



Yes, your computer was hacked by me. When some psycho decided that I had caused his browser problems, I decided to get serious about my hacking. I use an interesting form of magic, based on ancient Norse runes. Anyway, the details are not important. In addition to raising hell with computers, I can cause your cow to run dry, and if you have barley or rye crops, well, you can just forget about them.

You think it's been a tough summer? Just wait.
 
The bs on Hatfield was not passively leaked, it was intentionally leaked by the FBI to destroy Hatfield's reputation. The people who leaked it have never been hunted down and brought to justice.

Ivins could not have committed suicide. The social worker said he was waiting to be indicted, then would kill the people who planted evidence on him. That contradicts suicide. The FBI killed Dr. Ivins before he could reveal who had planted the evidence agianst him. That is the only explanation consistent with the facts.


As you realize better than almost anyone else, what you're saying is impossible. Seven thousand FBI agents participated in the cover-up of the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy's madcap extravaganza. Defying the laws of probability, there have been zero leaks in seven years. The FBI simply can't leak anything, right?
 
By the way, if this whole anthrax thing was just another government false-flag operation, why didn't they pin it on some Obama-loving terrorist, or Iranian, or North Korean or something -- you know, someone useful. Why blame it on some lone nutcase of no apparent political agenda? What's the point of that, just a bit of batting practice?
 
I have moved this thread to Conspiracy Theories.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady
 
By the way, if this whole anthrax thing was just another government false-flag operation, why didn't they pin it on some Obama-loving terrorist, or Iranian, or North Korean or something -- you know, someone useful. Why blame it on some lone nutcase of no apparent political agenda? What's the point of that, just a bit of batting practice?


THis is exactly the point I made to Galileo's playmates. A false flag attack to claim that the anthrax was sent by an American scientist. When that starts to make sense, you end up in a mental institution.
 
what was Ivins motive?
and what evidence proved him guilty?

http://wap.courant.mlogic3g.com/detail.jsp?key=155281&rc=la&full=1

A few months before he was targeted in the deadly 2001 anthrax attacks, then-Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle sent a letter to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld questioning whether the anthrax vaccine the military was giving soldiers was unsafe and should be discontinued.

The letter, obtained by The Courant, was written with the help of a number of Connecticut officials. They were concerned about complaints from local National Guard members who refused to take the vaccine because they feared it would make them ill.


Apart from raising the issue of the vaccine's safety, the criticism may have had an unintended effect. NBC News reported Tuesday that federal authorities today will reveal that those same complaints could be among the motives in the anthrax attacks that left an Oxford woman and four others dead.

The suspected killer, Bruce Ivins, was one of the Army's lead scientists on the anthrax vaccine and was angered by suggestions that it made recipients ill, NBC reported.


Investigators also are expected to allege that Ivins may have mailed anthrax to generate renewed interest in saving the vaccine and in encouraging the military to spend more money developing a new vaccine -- one that he helped produce and may have stood to profit from.

Ivins committed suicide Aug. 1 as federal authorities prepared to file charges against him.
 
Of course Ivins had a motive--the man was a Christian Zionist. Or in English, a pro-Israel agitator who wanted nothing less than the end of the world. The whole point of the attack was to frame Al Qaeda and the Islamic world in general, thus provoking an all-out war in the middle east, hopefully culminating in American military intervention and Israeli occupation of Jerusalem, followed by rebuilding the Temple and the timely arrival of Armageddon. I only wish I was making this up.
 
Christian zionist?
Is that the people breeding a red bull, to be burned to ash.
The story about creating a greater israel, building davids tempel and poured the ash on a priest. He will the summon jesus, start world war 3 and then we all got to hell?

Did i get any of the details wrong?
 
Edited by Darat: 
Breach of Rule 4 & Rule 6 removed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Edited by Darat: 
Breach of Rule 4 & Rule 6 removed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Google Meryl Nass. Anthrax expert and doesn't believe a word of the official story.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom