fullflavormenthol
Master Poster
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2008
- Messages
- 2,415
Irrelevant.
No...that is pretty relevant.
Actually, this is a 'domestic' tour of duty. We are not talking about the National Guard or a Army Unit.
Neither was I. Maybe you should have read the article as it appeared in the Army Times.
I didn't say 'all', you did.
Oh....but context is important, and the context was cleary soldiers with PTSD doing 'Crowd control' as you phrased it. It is very clear what the context was.
It only takes one.
So you are saying all soldiers are bad because one is bad? Isn't this the justification for a lot of things..."it only take one."?
Didn't say it was.
And I was making sure you understood that it wasn't.
It is not November 4th yet.
You see this is what I mean by context. If you want people to take away a clear message than perhaps you need to think a little more about what you write and the implications in your statements.
I would imagine it would be a slow process.
So declaring martial law is a slow process?
You have debunked nothing and I never claimed that we are currently under Martial Law.
Well than why did you present a video clip as proof, and then talk about PTSD troops being used for 'Crowd Control'? Were you trying to imply it (martial law) so you could later back away from it? I think that is what you were doing there.
And you talk out your backside.
Oh snap! You really pwned me there. Personal insults are always the best way to make your point, and they like totally prove you are right.