Axxman300
Philosopher
My guess is she was a freak in bed, plus smart, and had connections Epstein desired.No one has ever explained how Ghislaine got to be Epstein's no.2 (or was it the other way around?)
My guess is she was a freak in bed, plus smart, and had connections Epstein desired.No one has ever explained how Ghislaine got to be Epstein's no.2 (or was it the other way around?)
No. He was the predecessor. Epstein died on his watch (hmmm...) Maxwell was sentenced during Biden's term, and investigations were ongoing at the time. Even if they could have legally released anything, there was no huge demand from the Biden base to release info, be it from JFK, UFOs or whatever...the CT screaming was all from MAGA. I didn't single out Trump--he singled himself out as the great releaser of all info on the sordid deep state and Qanon sex cabals...can't imagine what he is so reluctant to follow through on his promises ROFLIt's not about who's in the files. It's about who had the power to see justice done, and declined.
The way you put it, this "justice" goes all the way back to the Clinton era, if not further. So why single out latecomer Trump? His predecessors seem to be much more fully invested in an Epstein cover up.
Sounds right, from WIki: Throughout childhood, Maxwell lived with her family in Oxford at Headington Hill Hall a 53-room mansion, where the offices of Pergamon Press, a publishing company run by her father, were also located.My guess is she was a freak in bed, plus smart, and had connections Epstein desired.
First, Epstein's first criminal case began in 2005 in Florida. Bush was President, and it began as a Florida case, but the FBI was asked by local law enforcement to join the investigation. Epstein was arrested in July, 2006. In spite of multiple victims the local grand jury returned only one charge of felony solicitation. His high-priced defense team was a who's who of top-drawer lawyers. They got him a light sentence.It's not about who's in the files. It's about who had the power to see justice done, and declined.
The way you put it, this "justice" goes all the way back to the Clinton era, if not further. So why single out latecomer Trump? His predecessors seem to be much more fully invested in an Epstein cover up.
ETA: How are you so confident there's no Biden anywhere in the unreleased Epstein files? Have you seen the files? Can you explain why the Biden administration didn't publish the list of names, if Biden himself wasn't implicated?
If it's telling that the Trump admin has done nothing, it must be equally telling that the Clinton and Obama and Biden admins did nothing.
True. I have often observed that riding the tiger is easy; it's getting off that can be a little tricky.This is all their doing. The fed the MAGA and QAnon cattle a line of BS, and now they're screwed.
The release of the “Epstein client list” has long been the holy grail for the Maga movement. Supposedly, this list, once released, would incriminate a veritable who’s who of liberal elites complicit in Jeffrey Epstein’s child sex-trafficking operation and expose the moral rot at the heart of the Democratic establishment.
The mystery surrounding the Epstein files also became a vehicle for QAnon conspiracy theorists to push their ideas about a “deep state” cover-up of a network of global pedophiles into the broader tent of the Maga movement.
During his campaign, Donald Trump promised on several occasions to declassify the Epstein files, which would include the “list”. Before they joined the government, Trump’s FBI chief, Kash Patel, and deputy FBI chief, Dan Bongino, spent years on podcasts and TV appearances winking at QAnon and Epstein conspiracy theorists and demanding the files’ release, even suggesting that the Biden administration was withholding them to protect its own.

![]()
The FBI's Jeffrey Epstein Prison Video Had Nearly 3 Minutes Cut Out
Metadata from the “raw” Epstein prison video shows approximately 2 minutes and 53 seconds were removed from one of two stitched-together clips. The cut starts right at the “missing minute.”www.wired.com
article claims there’s actually nearly 3 minutes of missing footage
Donald J. Trump
@realDonald Trump
The Radical Left Democrats have hit pay dirt, again! Just like with the FAKE and fully discredited Steele Dossier, the lying 51 "Intelligence" Agents, the Laptop from Hell, which the Dems swore had come from Russia (No, it came from Hunter Biden's bathroom!), and even the Russia, Russia, Russia Scam itself, a totally fake and made up story used in order to hide Crooked Hillary Clinton's big loss in the 2016 Presidential Election, these Scams and Hoaxes are all the Democrats are good at It's all they have - They are no good at governing, no good at policy, and no good at picking winning candidates. Also, unlike Republicans, they stick together like glue.
Their new SCAM is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my PAST supporters have bought into this "◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊," hook, line, and sinker. They haven't learned their lesson, and probably never will, even after being conned by the Lunatic Left for 8 long years. I have had more success in 6 months than perhaps any President in our Country's history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax. Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore! Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Ah yes, https://echoschildren.bandcamp.com/track/riding-a-tigerTrue. I have often observed that riding the tiger is easy; it's getting off that can be a little tricky.
He also throws cold water on the notion that Epstein was Mossad (if true, Dershowitz says he could have used the information to get a better deal).Epstein never created a “client list.” The FBI interviewed alleged victims who named several “clients.” These names have been redacted. They should be disclosed but the courts have ordered them sealed. I know who they are. They don’t include any current officeholders. We don’t know whether the accusations are true. The courts have also sealed negative information about some of the accusers to protect them. Neither the Justice Department nor private defense lawyers are free to disregard court sealing orders. The media can and should petition the courts for the release of all names and information so the public can draw its own conclusions.
At the risk of being accused of a "fringe reset" what is the best evidence to convince a good faith agnostic skeptic that there are actually files which include a list of clients who went to Epstein & co. for nefarious purposes? (Not talking about money management, however shady.)Biden isn't in the Epstein files.