• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread Epstein murdered

Seems fair to conclude Andrew was one of the people with whom Epstein shared his victims, given this entire subsection of his wiki bio.

When I see stuff like this, though, it seems people are expecting a much longer client list to drop:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1943393800828940665

What's been weird of late is that now I'm seeing this from my social feeds on the left, in addition to my MAGA in-laws.
 
Last edited:
i don’t think it’s strange, it’s a vulnerability.

and despite so many maga supporters being complete tools, even they have a hard time squaring up with what credibly appears the admin is concealing the biggest pedo ring in modern history because his name is all over the documents they’ve been promising to release

besides, trump is acting suspicious and it seems to be bothering him, so why not shove it in their faces as much as possible before they eventually resign themselves to comfort with pedophilia? i mean, they will like they always do. but until then
 
dirtywick said:
and despite so many maga supporters being complete tools, even they have a hard time squaring up with what credibly appears the admin is concealing the biggest pedo ring in modern history because his name is all over the documents they’ve been promising to release
Click to expand...
The highlighted bit looks like some 10-gallon tinfoil hattery from where I'm sitting.

I am at least dutifully skeptical of FBI/DOJ claims that their "systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list'" along with "no credible evidence...that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions" and no evidence "that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties." That said, their claims seem more plausible than the idea that Epstein and Maxwell were servicing a list of clients which dwarfs the various grooming gang scandals coming out of the UK or *ahem* the Catholic Church.
 
maybe there’s been a few bigger ones. it’s decades long and they claim there were hundreds of victims over several decades. so pretty big.

but thanks for pointing that out. 3rd biggest it is then.
 
*adjusts tin foil hat*

Maybe Maxwell can't access any damning lists/video/other proofs while she is in lockup, so it's good business to keep her there till she commits suicide in her own cell one day?
 
d4m10n said:
What's been weird of late is that now I'm seeing this from my social feeds on the left, in addition to my MAGA in-laws.
Click to expand...
Yep, the left want to bring down Trump, and the right want to bring down Clinton.

The accusations are a hot potato thrown from one side to the other, nobody wanting to catch it, nobody able to make them stick, because neither side, when in government, were able or willing to produce either a client list or client files.
 
www.cbsnews.com

How did Jeffrey Epstein make all of his money?

New legal documents are renewing interest in how Jeffrey Epstein's former net worth and how he amassed his fortune. Here's how he made his money.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com

article regarding how epstein amassed his vast fortunes. really a bunch of oddities to me, appears to be basically a con man imo. a lot of pretty large settlements from the fallout of his proclivities as well.
 
Donald posted a huge rant to announce that he will be suing: The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Rupert Murdoch over Epstein.

Donald J. Trump
@realDonald Trump
The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued. Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so. The Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn't want to hear that. Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway. President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr. Murdoch, shortly. The Press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don't even exist. President Trump has already beaten George Stephanopoulos/ABC, 60 Minutes/CBS, and others, and looks forward to suing and holding accountable the once great Wall Street Journal. It has truly turned out to be a "Disgusting and Filthy Rag" and, writing defamatory lies like this, shows their desperation to remain relevant. If there were any truth at all on the Epstein Hoax, as it pertains to President Trump, this information would have been revealed by Comey, Brennan, Crooked Hillary, and other Radical Left Lunatics years ago. It certainly would not have sat in a file waiting for "TRUMP" to have won three Elections. This is yet another example of FAKE NEWS!
Click to expand...
 
Ha! As much as it would be hilarious for Rupert Murdoch to publish a letter that finally takes down Donald Trump, I find it unbelievable that he wrote that letter of him and Esptein in an imaginary cryptic dialogue in the third person, where he is referring to himself as an "Enigma".

If there is one thing that Trump is not, it's an enigma.

Then again, his Truth Social post has him denying it is real... in the third person. 🤔
 
The letter definitely does not read like it's written by Trump, as much as I'd like to see him taken down.
 
the REAL, ACTUAL Epstein scandal is that ALL of the Media made the conscious decision not to investigate any connections between Trump and Epstein at any point before or after he became President, or worse, decided to sit on what they had.

They should be forced to start any item they publish with "don't trust us, we are just partisan hacks who will never tell you anything that our CEO decided would hurt his pals."

And goes doubly for Merrick Garland and any other Prosecutor who decided that finding out who much of a rapist a future or current President is isn't worth the effort.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom