A database error interrupted my response here, so I will add it here, though it might be a bit late:
The website in question contains no evidence that a problem actually exists, and contains abundant evidence that the person running it considers the events in question inherently abhorrent and degenerate, and openly denigrates not only those but all who disagree with her political slant.
And yet, you jump at the opportunity to empower people whose own writings drip with bigotry and intolerance to formulate the laws by which we all live. People whose expressed and open intent is to deprive us all of choice; not to oppose but to combat political dissent; and whose almost certain further intent is to marginalize or even criminalize not just some abstract people but people you yourself have loved and respected; to forbid and reject not just the things you reject, but those you don't; to outlaw behavior you yourself have enjoyed.
I think too many people are willing to give up too much to serve principles so vague they have difficulty even defining them.
I repeat what I think I said before. Whatever it seems to purport, this website is not about controlling a problem (whose very existence is uncertain). It is about suppressing and eradicating, reversing what some see as social progress and others see as sin. If you let people like that make the laws, you're inviting a whole lot more than you think you're after. You'll get their laws as well as yours, and they'll bowl you over once more with their all-or-nothing false dichotomy. Burn the village to save it. Fine if you are happy with that, but a big mistake if you are not.
