I still can't see the problem. I would have been happy for my kids to go to a drag show, as long as it wasn't obscene.
Shouldn't parents be allowed to decide what their kids see?
I still can't see the problem. I would have been happy for my kids to go to a drag show, as long as it wasn't obscene.
Shouldn't parents be allowed to decide what their kids see?
Deadbeat parents who abrogate their responsibility to care for their offspring and rely on the school of life to bring them up can't complain if life decides to teach them things (like accepting people for who they are and tolerance) that they hate.Also, I am not sure about every library's policies for children. But I can tell you, by age 8 I was a "latch-key" kid. Meaning, I had a house key and was unattended for much of the day. So, many kids like that might just wind up at the library, I imagine. So, you know, I think the discussion of age-appropriate restrictions is very relevant to this topic.
Or at least a relevant concern for parents.
I wonder what some folk make of Tom of Finland...I mean, all those very butch, muscly, hyper-masculine men...OK, most of them have their knobs out, but all very masculine and manly...Just ask Rob Halford.
Can't deny that I'm struggling to see how a leading creator of gay pornographic images and "out" Judas Priests lead singer manifesting them in his stage attire fits into a discussion about drag artists reading to children.
I still can't see the problem. I would have been happy for my kids to go to a drag show, as long as it wasn't obscene.
Shouldn't parents be allowed to decide what their kids see?
Yes. Did I claim otherwise? Not sure where you got that from. The point was that referring to Drag Queens as a slight variation of clowns is, imo, a very simplistic analysis. Perhaps even disingenuous. Especially based on some of the "mission-statements" I've read.
I have repeatedly stated that my primary concern is the voices of concerned parents being silenced. This is a common trend with liberals, these days. To downplay, discredit, and flat-out try to take away the voices of conservative parents. As usual, it is front-and-center in this thread, too.
You can't imagine how funny that sounds, considering the consensus in this thread, and the overall venue.
Look, it does not matter where Drag Queens fall in The Pocket Guide to Freaks, Geeks, and Fetishes. What matters is that liberals stop trying discredit, minimize, and silence conservative parents and their concerns.
The fact that I consider Drag Queens weirdos, freaks, or whatever...I have a right to that opinion. Just like someone who feels the opposite has a right to theirs.
How does banning people from attending ,= choice.Of course.
But some liberals seem to be against that very notion. Hence they shun of the idea of age-appropriate restrictions on events such as DSH.
.
Yes, I am intentionally not taking the conversation there. It is a waste of time.
I have earlier stated that I am not suggesting an outright ban. But rather age-appropriate restrictions. It should be enough for me to say I don't want my young child to have access to it; whether or not I can be standing over them at every moment of the day, or at every venue such an event might be presented.
Parents have a legitimate right to these concerns.
Yes, I am intentionally not taking the conversation there. It is a waste of time.
I have earlier stated that I am not suggesting an outright ban. But rather age-appropriate restrictions. It should be enough for me to say I don't want my young child to have access to it; whether or not I can be standing over them at every moment of the day, or at every venue such an event might be presented.
Parents have a legitimate right to these concerns.
“This is something that was overtly sexual. They clearly said, ‘All ages welcome.’ And now, apparently the left is gaslighting me into thinking that I’m somehow the crazy one for having a problem with this,” Gonzales told Carlson
Of course.
But some liberals seem to be against that very notion. Hence they shun of the idea of age-appropriate restrictions on events such as DSH.
Also, it doesn't matter whether you can see the problem or not. We aren't just talking about your kids. "I don't see a problem with kids being exposed to xyz", is not a valid argument that it should be acceptable to everyone, or even the default.
Of course.
But some liberals seem to be against that very notion.
Found this related to the group in the OP.
https://texasscorecard.com/state/defend-our-kids-texas-to-expose-lefts-perversion-of-children/
And the NSFW Drag video, on twitter (also viewable in the linked article):
https://twitter.com/SaraGonzalesTX/...texas-to-expose-lefts-perversion-of-children/
Honestly, I don't see how anyone can expect all parents to be OK with this?
I just had to scroll down a few replies to find out that it was not marked as "All ages welcome". In fact it was marked:
"This event contains strong language and suggestive dialogue and may not be appropriate for all ages. Viewer discretion is advised."
"If you would not allow your children to see a Rated R movie, this is not the event for them."