TobiasTheViking
Resident Viking Autist
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2005
- Messages
- 6,925
O.OAbout as addicted as they come, pal.
Rolfe.
![]()
O.OAbout as addicted as they come, pal.
Rolfe.
![]()
I believe you're thinking of Rowlf'Sat you, Rolfe? Somehow, I pictured you as more hirsute, with a bulbuous nose and long, floppy ears...
Nice costume, though.
I can't see anything untrue in Rolfe's signature. Can you be a bit more specific as to what you think is a lie?
Your signature is still just argument by assertion.scroll pages of nch and randi forums and also hpathy and otherhealth.
This is the first time I've seen you.Mine signature is appearing for the last two months or so? why are you objecting today?
Well, because quoting someone can't really be a lie. It can be a misquote. Here is the post in original context. I found it in about 2 minutes.Why you don't have objection on rolfe signature. it is pure lie.
ETA: That's the fifth post from the bottom.Posted: 04 July 04 at 16:48 | IP Logged
To give Rolfe his due...
We will prove it with double blind test. if we will fail then we will leave homeopathic practice for ever.
We are the most honest in the sense that you design db protocol for us. The choice is yours. We will just follow it.
Please tell us how you would control the test you suggested in the thread http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=37460&page=29
How would you know if it was the Camphor remedy having an effect on the patient or placebo, or even if their condition changed by chance?
If I were to carry out this test I would take 3 groups. One group would be given a homeopathic remedy, one a placebo and one group is given nothing. I would ensure that the patients and the people prescribing the homeopathic remedy and judging the results didnt know which patients belonged to which group.
If homeopathic Camphor remdy is effective in treating patients with the ailments you described then the group which were given the remedy will show greater improvments than the other 2 groups. DO YOU AGREE Dr. A Sheikh???
I googled hpathy, then clicked on hpathy.com and then the forum link. Then I tried to figure out what had happened. Realizing the problem, I closed the giant ad then I searched for "Rolfe" and the thread was 10 or 15 lines down.Hey, how did you find that? I thought the original had fallen to Stalin's airbrush.
Rolfe.
Dr. A Sheikh,
are you going to continue to obfuscate or get on with defining a test protocol?
First of all you say:
Then you refuse to define your own protocol:
So, I'll do it for you. Earlier I emailed you a simple test protocol concerning your claims with homeopathic Camphor. For everyone else's sake heres what I wrote:
Now then Dr. A Sheikh, Do you agree that the protocol I have described would be a suffcient test? Do you agree to stand by your words and take a test using the protocol I have described and if this test proved that homeopathic camphor didnt work would you give up your practice? Are you going to do anything you say Dr. A Sheikh? or are you going to continually make claims then run away?
Its time to put up or shut up Dr. A Sheikh!
Don't you have any patients, "doctor"?Now where are the camphor patients?
I am ready to use that protocol. Now where are the camphor patients? I am ready to carryout DBT.
If you're planning to apply for the Randi million, you might want to read this part:I said send camphor patients. Where I could search for camphor patients? Gather some camphor patients for me. I don't have camphor patients yet. I am seriously thinking to quit homeopathy if DBT fails over homeopathic remedies.
5.4. Who pays for my expenses, and why?
You do. It's spelled out in the Challenge rules. Remember that your position in the Challenge is that of defendant. But it's also important to realize that there is an important difference between this and a court of law: you are not innocent until proven guilty. Rather, you are normal until proven paranormal, and it is up to you to prove your paranormality. This means that you have to pay for travel, you have to pay to build any devices you want to demonstrate, and so forth. All the ingredients required in proving your claim are yours and yours alone. The JREF will under no circumstances incur such costs.
5.5. Who pays for the JREF's expenses, and why? Again, you do, and again, it's spelled out in the Challenge rules. The reason is that the JREF doesn't see any reason for it to spend any money to help you defend yourself. However, all observers work on a volunteer basis, so no JREF associate or investigator will present you with an expense bill following testing. The JREF will not surprise you with such added costs. You are expected to arrive at testing with everything you need, and it is your job to make the necessary provisions beforehand. The JREF will in no way assist you in these matters.
I am seriously thinking you know those studies will never be done to your satisfaction.I am seriously thinking to quit homeopathy if DBT fails over homeopathic remedies.
Are you kidding? First you ask me to design a protocol for you to prove your claim, now you want me to carry it out for you!!!!!
You make the claim, you prove it! surley you have some patients, your are a 'doctor'! if you apply for the JREF challenge with the protocol I suggested I'm sure they'll have someone in Pakistan come and vist you and your patients in your own practice.
At the moment, I have no camphor patient. You don't have to carryout the DBT for me. I will do it for myself. Thank you. The problem is for proving camphor symptoms you require few patients almost thirty plus for three groups atleast 10 in each group. From where I could have thirty patients in a row? Please follow this point. If you kindly favour me in finding patients then I will be grateful to you.