Dr. Sheikh will prove homoeopathy works or quit!

[Mojo]

In this post, Dr. A Sheikh has stated that he (and others, presumably the rest of the MAS collective) will cease to practice homoeopathy if they fail to prove that it works in a double blinded test:

We will prove it with double blind test. if we will fail then we will leave homeopathic practice for ever.

OK, Sheikh, get on with it. Put up or shut up.

You can use this thread to give us details of your proposed test protocol etc.

 

[Zep]

Oh, THIS will be good! I can't wait to see what protocol he comes up with! No doubt it will studiously avoid even the merest hint of the most basic logic and integrity that even a child of nine or ten could understand.

 

[BillC]

I suspect that it will be a new interpretation of the phrase 'double blind'.

 

[Zep]

They "doubly blind" themselves to the results.

 

[Aepervius]

Really ?

I suspect that it will be a new interpretation of the phrase 'double blind'.

I suspect we won#t even get an honest answer from him on this thread, meaning, we will not even get a protocol at all, jsut more question and dodging.

 

[Mojo]

Of course, in the event that he is unable to produce an adequate protocol and to successfully use it to prove that homoeopathy works, Dr. Sheikh is welcome to use this thread to post his confirmation that he has permanently ceased to practice homoeopathy.

 

[Dr. A Sheikh]

In this post, Dr. A Sheikh has stated that he (and others, presumably the rest of the MAS collective) will cease to practice homoeopathy if they fail to prove that it works in a double blinded test:

OK, Sheikh, get on with it. Put up or shut up.

You can use this thread to give us details of your proposed test protocol etc.

We are the most honest in the sense that you design db protocol for us. The choice is yours. We will just follow it.

 

[ReFLeX]

Dr. Sheikh, does your signature contain an argument anywhere in there?

 

[Czarcasm]

Will he be using a single silk thread as a homeopathetic "blindfold"?

 

[Dr. A Sheikh]

My signature represents skeptic point of view. I have collected from many other sites and including these pages of forum where they mostly post.

 

[Dr. A Sheikh]

Will he be using a single silk thread as a homeopathetic "blindfold"?

never mind. I am replying where other members made some post. I am also facing difficulties.

 

[Mojo]

We are the most honest in the sense that you design db protocol for us. The choice is yours. We will just follow it.

Why should we help you out with your homework?

Come on, Sheikh. Surely someone who knows your subject as well as you claim can do something as basic as designing a double blinded test protocol?

Post it here, and I'm sure someone will let you whether or not it's satisfactory.

 

[Mojo]

My signature represents skeptic point of view. I have collected from many other sites and including these pages of forum where they mostly post.

Can you provide a link to somewhere where a sceptic has said that this is their point of view? Or are you prepared to admit that no sceptic has said this?

 

[Dr. A Sheikh]

scroll pages of nch and randi forums and also hpathy and otherhealth.

Mine signature is appearing for the last two months or so? why are you objecting today?

Why you don't have objection on rolfe signature. it is pure lie.

 

[Rolfe]

No, it's not. It even links to the forum pages proving exactly how true it is. Have a read, be my guest.

Rolfe.

 

[TobiasTheViking]

@Rolfe: love the b5 quote... though it makes me wonder if you are an addict

 

[Mojo]

scroll pages of nch and randi forums and also hpathy and otherhealth.

You say a sceptic has said this. Prove it: provide a link.

Mine signature is appearing for the last two months or so? why are you objecting today?

I've been complaining about it ever since I noticed it. For example, here I am asking you to back up your assertion on January 2nd. You still haven't; because you can't.

Why you don't have objection on rolfe signature. it is pure lie.

I can't see anything untrue in Rolfe's signature. Can you be a bit more specific as to what you think is a lie?

 

[TobiasTheViking]

I can't see anything untrue in Rolfe's signature. Can you be a bit more specific as to what you think is a lie?

The fact that the young mother who died was just a figment of everyones imagination. It was a hypothetical case, but had it been real, that would have been the outcome..


I must admit i agree with the homeopaths on that one, i think it should say hypothetical case.. but.. not my signature.

 

[Rolfe]

@Rolfe: love the b5 quote... though it makes me wonder if you are an addict

About as addicted as they come, pal.

Rolfe.

 

[Rolfe]

The fact that the young mother who died was just a figment of everyones imagination. It was a hypothetical case, but had it been real, that would have been the outcome..


I must admit i agree with the homeopaths on that one, i think it should say hypothetical case.. but.. not my signature.

Once upon a time it did, then the new forum software truncated everyone's sig. Look, you can read all about it on the link. The only reason it never happened for real is that most of Snoopy's supposed patients are either hypochondriacs or imaginary.

Rolfe.