Yep. Is that some kind of problem? Every dowser that has ever been tested has failed.
We are not here dealing with every dowser that has ever been tested.
We are dealing with one specific dowser and his specific way of dowsing.
He doesn't have to carry everyone else's failure on his shoulders.
Edge himself has been tested and failed.
If you had spent the last 30 years convinced that something works because you have seen it work, and then someone sets up a test and that thing fails, would you immediately give up 30 years believing that that thing works as a result of this one test? Of course not. You would be an autumn leaf blowing in the wind. You would look for reasons why it failed. You would demand a restest that accounts for what you regard as methodological flaws in the testing procedure. Edge demands no less than you would.
Although he has applied again, he still does not appear to have any idea what he can actually do or how he could test it.
He has found a different type of dowsing rod that works better.
He has continued his search for "neutral ground" were his success rate might exceed that required to pass the test.
He has had about zero help from the JREF - how long is it now that he has submitted his protocol without any useful response?
Assuming anything other than that dowsing does not work would really just be silly. If someone can come up with some evidence that this conclusion is wrong, great. I'm not holding my breath.
You are assuming that edge will fail before he has had a chance to test his procedure. You don't have to hold your breath, just mark time and let this thing play out. What is your rush? There are plenty other things to amuse you on the forum in the mean time. There is no need to rush this project into a forgone conclusion.